That's called the BIG LIE. Because no one in history has proven any election fraud worthy of changing election outcomes. Not even trumps own AG or head of cyber security in charge of elections could bring any charges to anyone.
I do think that part of it is overblown to a degree. Presidents are people too, and I think the idea that a President would have no business interests, etc doesn't really add up(going as far back as the orchid business for Washington and some earlier framers.). The key is always whether or not there's influence and despite all of the hollaring, there was no evidence of nefariousness regarding Trump's business connections or impacting the way his administration behaved. If we got a secret telegram tomorrow that revealed "the signatories of the accords signed the accords for free rooms in Mar--A-LAGO"(to make it the most blatantly obvious thing Liberals could think of), from a national security standpoint: Is that really a problem? Senator Rubio(R-Florida) talks about how we use aid to effectively enable cooperation all of the time. To me, such an incident as the one I hypothesized, is no different. Use every tool in the tool book to accomplish American Objectives, especially if it involves us not firing a shot. And yes team Democrats, I'd love you to use our diplomatic corps to the same advantage. Go on a diplomatic blitz, let's get some breaking news on good relations.
Just a matter of time before the most serious Trump crime comes to light, i.e., he once tore the "do not remove" tag off a mattress.
The Republicans have probably learned how the vote harvesting game works. Also, any orchestrated nation-wide riots cannot be used to influence voting with Biden being the incombent. At this point Trump is clearly likely to become the next President.
I could not help but wonder if this was an intimidation article fed to the journalists but to scare any agents, etc. involved. IOW, a plant...
Snort.... I'm letting you know I'm stopping reading after that rib tickler.... Ever hear of the Trump International Hotel in DC??
One man’s democracy is another man’s authoritarian state. It just depends on what side of the isle you are on.
The teensy problem being that none of that is true. That would be why none of it was presented to a court. Lying to the court like is a crime. Propagandists don't want to go to jail for the stuff they made up. They just want to spread that propaganda to the gullible. But go on. Give us your conspiracy theory about why no one has presented this evidence to a court. This should be funny.
Quiet! Do Not Disturb Ivana. Jack E. Smith · May 31, 2023 @7Veritas4 · Follow Grab your shovels. We’re going to Bedminster. cnn.com EXCLUSIVE: Trump captured on tape talking about classified document he kept after leaving the White... Federal prosecutors have obtained an audio recording of a summer 2021 meeting where Trump describes a Pentagon document about a potential attack on Iran. Marc Rosso @Marcandrewrosso · Follow Trump’s in-house legal team is ready to help 5:43 PM · May 31, 2023
Like Biden did in the Mar-a-lago raid? Requesting the FBI through a “special access request”? Is that how it is done in Banana Republics? https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FtZAXeHX0AcDtoI?format=jpg&name=900x900
Standard procedure. lol 'April 11, 2022' 'The FBI asks NARA for access to the 15 boxes it retrieved from Mar-a-Lago in January. The request was formally transmitted to NARA by President Joe Biden’s White House Counsel’s office, because the incumbent president controls presidential documents in NARA custody.' https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/09/politics/doj-investigation-trump-documents-timeline/index.html
As we can see from the increasing number of brown shirts on college campuses who demand free speech be done in designated areas only.
That's as big a collection of false and unsupported by facts statements as has been posted on this site in quite some time. And that's saying something considering all the MAGA types repeating the Big Lie, which you managed to work in there as well. Do you ever post anything factual or truthful ?
Thanks for verifying that the Biden administration used the DOJ to attack his political opposition... What was it called now..... Banana republic... we would see this in a communist country.. nothing standard about it...as this has been decided in the public courts that a president deems what is personal and what is not... he decides what to keep... especially since Trump already declassified the documents. .all documented and stuck away in the federal register for safe keeping..
This was decided already in 2012 ... so anything they think they have on him is only a political hack job.. the judge ruled Clinton could keep any records he wants... so can Trump... Biden was only a VP Judge Amy Jackson ruled in 2012 that a president's discretion to declare records "personal" is far-reaching and mostly unchallengeable. video here https://justthenews.com/politics-po...-tapes-bill-clintons-sock-drawer-could-impact https://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-co.../JW-v-NARA-Clinton-Tapes-transcript-01834.pdf https://twitter.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1560234754292813827