The Fascist NYPD has a new Robotic Dog!

False Flags and Secret Societies

“The very word ‘secrecy’ is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently
and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings.”
--JFK quoted in a speech on April 27, 1961, at the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel inNew York City to the American Newspaper Publishers Association.​

Ancient Hindu Swastika with the Neo-Nazi Black Sun Swastika, and American Law Enforcement False Flag​

Why are American law enforcement officers wearing a desecrated flag of the United States on their uniforms?

The fascist soldiers of the Ukrainian military (which we paid hundreds of billions of dollars to educate and train) wore abstract symbols and patches of the Nazi swastika whose design was stolen from an ancient Hindu religious symbol. It is deliberately meant to be ambiguous so that it will be accepted as a symbol among the general population. I did not post the actual Nazi swastika because it could be censored.

And there is the more contemporary symbolism that is designed to be ambiguous except for those that are members of a secret society.

So I have a big problem with American police departments displaying this symbolism of a distorted American flag (a segregated black and white strip is also a line) to represent the American people, its society, and its values. What the **** is wrong with American law enforcement? Did these “losers and suckers” (in the words of the Orange Jesus, Donald “Stinky” Trump) not take an oath to protect against all American enemies foreign and domestic? But yet they wear an unknown ambiguous flag as domestic peace officer.

“I, officer name, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same....”

A false oath...and you are wearing a false flag---at least NOT an American flag.

The American Constitution: love it, or we will make you leave...your job.​

And what really makes me angry is I totally missed this egregious violation of American constitutional values until I viewed the video below. Thanks so much Mr. Good Citizen Transparency! God is with you, and as the Muslim Palestinians say, “God is Great!”

​

 

Kennedy's speech has been censored.

 

Man, why are you simping for Chilli? That clown is the shame of the 1a activist crowd.

 

Too many policemen, no liberty; Too many soldiers, no peace; Too many lawyers, no justice."
--Lin Yutang (1895-1976)​

I have watched numerous videos recorded by DeCastro (aka Mr. Good Citizen Transparency) and carefully listened to his law lectures and come to the
the conclusion that he is completely authentic in all his motives and committed to his noble project. I cannot detect any logical fallacies committed with his legal arguments and analysis. He constantly quotes penal codes and case law much like what can be found in the California Department of Justice legal Source-book (See the "California Peace Officers Legal Source-Book"). DeCastro's critique of law enforcement procedures completely agree with my knowledge and experience as a former peace officer.

I watched the videos critical of DeCastro's work by youtuber MichaelG but he only uses ad hominin arguments against DeCastro and so is a waste of time. DeCastro is completely authentic based on what I studied.

“You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all the people all of the time.”
—Abraham Lincoln
{(∃x)[Px * (∀y)(Ty ⊃ Fxy)] * (∃y)[Ty * (∀x)(Px ⊃ Fxy)]} * (∃y)( ∃x)[Ty * Px * ~Fxy]​

Symbols:
Px = ‘x is a person’
Tx = ‘x is a time’
Fxy= ‘you can fool x at time y’
(∀x) = ‘for all variables x’
(∃x) = 'for at least one variable x'
⊃ = Logical operator for conditional: If, then.
* = Conjunction ‘*’ ‘and’
~ = Negation, 'not'

 

Does this hold true for his numerous attempts to secure a restraining order against citizens exercising their right to free speech in public? Because in all of his attempts the judges found flaws in his legal arguments.

If he's such a great legal scholar, why is he ducking his Ohio warrant? Shouldn't he turn himself in and score a great legal victory for liberty in court?

 

I would always consult an attorney first. And what happened to the presumption of innocence? All of your objections can be answered with common sense. You have offered only weak petty bad faith criticism to stigmatize persons involved in legal proceedings whose chosen occupation it is to interact with the American court system. Martin Luther King was arrested a bunch of times--he must have been a criminal, right? On the other hand, nobody will lose as many indictments (over 90) as Trump will soon lose in court. You are not only inconsistent in your judgements of other persons, but you cannot be consistent with such an arbitrary criterion that doesn't substantiate your distorted views.

So, excuse me, I am now going to go wipe my butt.

 

You should use his trifold pamphlet he sold you

 

You mean the pamphlet quoting the U.S. Constitution. That's what I thought you believed of the Constitution..."for losers and suckers" as Donald "Stinky" Trump once wisecracked.

 

Eliminationist Talk in America by Right-wing Fascists

“After the Bay of Pigs debacle, he [CIA agent David Ferrie] denounced Kennedy with such vicious abandon​

during a speech to a veteran's group that he was asked to step down from the podium.
The president “ought to be shot,” Ferrie began telling people.”
--Devils' Chessboard, p. 463​

“Civil war is here, right now. We'll give Trump one last chance to declare this a Marxist insurrection
& suppress it as his duty demands. If he fails to do HIS duty, we will do OURS.”
-- Stewart Rhodes, Oath Keepers leader​

Eliminationist rhetoric is characteristic of fascist movements. Eliminationist talk is designed to mentally prepare its most extreme group members for violent action, not ideological persuasion. Below is an article on the history of this phenomenon in right-wing extremist groups studied by David Neiwert, an expert in this field. He has noticed a drumbeat of eliminationism in America. Eliminationism is defined as "it describes a kind of politics and culture that shuns dialogue and the democratic exchange of ideas for the pursuit of outright elimination of the opposing side, either through complete suppression, exile and ejection, or extermination."

Eliminationism in America: I
[Introducing a ten-part series]
Part I: The Lurker Below​

Prior to John F. Kennedy's public assassination eliminationist talk was ramped in the US. State Department and the CIA. In one incident the CIA agent pilot and pedophile (he always travelled with two young boys) shouted in a speech before a veteran's group, “Kennedy ought to be shot!” Ferrie was a Civil Air Patrol instructor when he first met the 15-year-old Lee Harvey Oswald, and they later work together in the CIA. In another case a Russian Orthodox Priest said of the “Kennedy problem” at the home of the right-wing Director W. Glenn Campbell of the Stanford Hoover Institution in the summer of 1963, “The Old Man will take care of it.” The “Old Man” was the nickname for CIA Director Allen Dulles. And the thing is they got away with Kennedy's murder completely. That is why nothing has changed.

I have been hearing about political fascist Roger Stone since the Vietnam War and the Nixon Administration and he reappeared in the Reagan Administration, and later Republican Administration. Who is going to remove this stone from my shoe? The young people of today will also have their fascist agent nemeses working night and day to ruin your life...like going to War in the Middle East. The American Justice System and especially the Democratic Party will do nothing to protect you for they have long ago turned you over to your political enemies.

Roger Stone has plotted to assassinate Congressman Eric Swalwell and lawyer Jerry Nadler. Good luck Eric and Jerry—you are on your own. Roger Stone spoke about the assassination plot to New York City's Finest, Sal Greco, a great Police Department to find a fascist police officer willing to murder two American government officials.

Public enemy Roger Stone introduced the pedophile mafia lawyer Roy Cohen to Trump in 1979. David Ferrie, Roy Cohen, Trump, Roger Stone: do they have anything in common?

Here is what Roger Stone said to NYPD officer Sal Greco in a recording:

“The Republican operative and close Donald Trump ally Roger Stone reportedly told an associate one of two prominent Democratic congressmen “ha[d] to die before the election” in 2020. “It’s time to do it,” Stone said, according to Mediaite, which cited a recording the outlet reported was made at a Florida restaurant. “Let’s go find Swalwell. It’s time to do it. Then we’ll see how brave the rest of them are. It’s time to do it. It’s either Nadler or Swalwell has to die before the election. They need to get the message. Let’s go find Swalwell and get this over with. I’m just not putting up with this **** anymore.” Roger Stone reportedly said leading Democratic congressman ‘has to die’ ….”

Is the American Justice System (LOL) going to let Stone get away again? LOL.

Are the American people so stupid that they are going to let these corrupt fascist thugs ruin their future again like in the last 60 years?

 

Dear Chilli DeCastro (aka Mr. Good Citizen Transparency),

I have seen a number of videos--most videos in fact--where Police Officers stopping persons with the justification of them being "suspicious."
I just want to say the word "suspicious" is from the ancient Greek word "σκοπός" (Sko-pos) which means "a lookout-man, watchman, and a spy, or scout. So American police officers are routinely stopping many American citizens accusing them of being "spies."

America is becoming like the nation of "The Democratic People's Republic of North Korean" that also claims to be a "democracy."

 

Fascist whore Ann E. Zimmerman​

DeCastro (aka Mr. Good Citizen Transparency) has been jailed for 180 days by the fascist whore and dishonorable Judge Ann E. Zimmerman of the fascist **** hole known as Clark County Nevada, and charged by the Nazi D.A. whore **** Agnes Botelho.
I have donated to his Fundraiser at Jose DeCastro: Legal Aid Fund, Donation Fund, Help People Fund (gofundme.com)

Here is the fascist Zimmerman's electoral history:
Ann E. Zimmerman is a judge for Department 8 of the Las Vegas Township Justice Court in Nevada. Zimmerman's current term ends on January 6, 2025. Zimmerman had no other candidate that ran against her for his Judgeship. That's one problem.

Zimmerman won re-election for the Department 8 judge of the Las Vegas Township Justice Court in Nevada outright in the primary on June 12, 2018, after the general election was canceled. It is unclear why the general election was cancelled.

Her fascist fiefdom covers a total of 7,891.43 square miles in southern Nevada. As of 2020, its population was 2,265,461.
Frau Zimmerman received one-hundred percent of vote in June 12, 2018 with no competing candidates.

The county Is 50% White, and 10% of her unfortunate subjects live below poverty level.

DeCastro should run against Zimmerman's who is up for re-election as a constitutional scholar and would be a great candidate to reveal the Nazi fascist rule in Clark County Nevada. I suspect she is a fascist Zionist, but I haven't found any other background information which points to that connection yet. But political fascist Zionist infiltration of the US government is a big problem in Washington D.C. and I will be writing an essay looking at this phenomenon soon.

I voted for Bernie Sanders twice in the last two National elections before he was sandbagged twice by the Democrats.

​

 

California Law: Department of Motor Vehicles 2024, p. 31

"In general, the First Amendment protects the right of drivers and passengers to record interactions with law enforcement in public spaces. If you are recording, you should immediately make that clear. You do not have a right to interfere with the officer’s lawful duties during the enforcement stop, and you should not reach into concealed areas to retrieve your recording device without the officer’s permission. If your recording is not interfering with the officer’s ability to lawfully do their job, an officer cannot confiscate your recording device, delete the recording, or destroy the device just because you are using it to record. In general, you also have the right to deny a request to unlock a cellular phone or provide a password to it, though under some circumstances, such as if you are on parole, you may have to give permission in response to such requests. Finally, no government employee can retaliate against you just because you recorded something in public."

 

“The unity of reason is disrupted by its division into departments each
of which is controlled by a special set of structural forms.”
--Paul Tillich (Systematic Theology, vol. I, p. 91)
​

Believe it or not, the Christian theologian Paul Tillich has something to say about law and legal reasoning. Tillich was the first non-Jewish professor at the university of Frankfurt to be fired along with sociologist Karl Mannheim and critical philosopher Max Horkheimer in 1933. Tillich had dismissed a Nazi student from his class. After these first phase of purging, many Jewish scholars had to flee Germany. Christian Theologian Reinhold Niebuhr was able to get Tillich out of Nazi Germany just before the Nazi paramilitary was about to catch up with him for telling a close friend that Goebbels was a drug addict, but then she innocently asked her hairdresser if it was true--the hairdresser was a fervent Nazi.

I'm telling you all this to say Tillich witnessed the rise of fascism in Germany and the tragic effect it had on the German judicial system and the destructive effect it had on civil life. His description of totalitarian suppression by using the formal legalistic structures of conventialism can be found in the first volume of his “Systematic Theology.” What Tillich writes here is a perfect statement of our complaint today in America against the hyper-militaristic character of civilian policing:

“Formalism in the realm of legal reason places exclusive emphasis on the structural necessities of justice without asking of the adequacy of a legal form to the human reality which it is supposed to shape. The tragic alienation between law and life which is a subject of complaint in all periods is not caused by bad will on the part of those who make and enforce the law; it is a consequence of the separation of form from emotional participation. Legalism in the sense of legal formalism can become, like certain types of logic, a kind of play with pure forms, consistent in itself, detached from life. If applied to life, this play can turn into a destructive reality. Form armed with power can become a terrible organ of suppression in a social group. From our point of view, legal formalism and totalitarian suppression are intimately related. Emotional reactions against legal formalism misunderstand the structural necessities of law, but they realize instinctively the inadequacy of legal formalism for meeting the demands of life (Tillich, Systematic Theology, vol. 1 p. 90).”

John Ehrlichman, who died in 1999, said of Nixon’s declaration of war on drugs: “The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I’m saying. We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course, we did.” The legal system can target any social group they desire, but it has deviating effects on the quality of life through systematic dehumanization. Tillich continues describing how this authoritarianism distorts all human relations leading to what Max Weber called “disenchantment" and despair:

“In the communal function of reason, formalism preserves, applies, and defends the conventional forms which have shaped social and personal Conventionalism affirms the social and personal forms as forms. Automatic obedience to the accepted ways of behavior is demanded by conventional formalism. Its tremendous power in social relations, in education, and in self-discipline makes it a tragic force in all human history. It tends to destroy the inborn vitality and creativity of every new being and of every new generation. It cripples life and replaces love by rule. It shapes personalities and communities by suppressing the spiritual and emotional substance which it is supposed to shape. The form destroys the meaning. Emotional reactions against conventional formalism are especially explosive and catastrophic. They have a “blind spot” with regard to the supporting, preserving, and directing power of convention and habit; but they are right in opposing its formalistic distortion with passion and sacrifice (Tillich, Systematic Theology, vol. 1 p. 90-1) [bolded text for emphasis].”

I think Tillich said it pretty well, but I don't think anyone--much less law enforcement and the courts--will even understand the complaint because they are viewing the world--and all of us--through a bureaucratic keyhole.

 

The Fascist NYPD has a new Robotic Dog!

Here's hoping it is paper trained!

 

This seems like a bizarre and wacky thread. Fascist police, robot dogs, dogs trained to sexually violate prisoners in another foreign country. You seem to be tying several disparate things together.

And then finally adding on allegations against Trump. Even though if you were honest, you know the claims against Trump are pretty dubious at best.

And people like you say the Right lives in a bubble of fantasy?!?

 

That's easy. When dealing with crudball criminals and crazy bastards send in an armed robot and avoid the risk of harm to a human police officer. Got any tough questions?

 

Chief of Police GUILTY of EXCESSIVE FORCE! Chief Puts 15 Year-old in MMA Hold for FREE SPEECH!
​

This video is about the Chief of Police of the City of Tonawanda, NY. On July 20th 2023 Robert Clontz Chief of Police was asked if he knew the 5 elements of the First Amendment. He said no but made the joke that he lives the Constitution for 34 years and can enforce it without even thinking about it cause it comes naturally.. Then on December 29th 2023 the New York State Attorney General found Robert Clowns I mean Clontz in violation of law and policy for his actions on July 22nd 2022 at the same festival I met him at!

Clontz used excessive force on a 15 year old boy for free speech, unlawfully arrested 2 minors. Clontz didn't seem to "live the Constitution" on that day and it definitely didn't "come natural" to him when he violated their 1st and 4th Amendment rights! The Erie County Fam went to the city council meeting and Chief Clontz had a smirk on his face.. He seems to think it's Funny! Det. Lt. Clontz committed multiple violations of law and policy. He unnecessarily followed the boys by himself while they were leaving the festival in compliance with the officers’ direction, escalated the encounter by repeatedly engaging with the boys as they walked away, and made unauthorized arrests and used excessive force. His actions resulted in a significant public disturbance and injuries to the boys and himself, all of which could, and should, have been avoided.

Critique of Chief of Police Robert Clontz.

And that's the problem. Police officers usually have a 13-week police academy, but only about 3 and a half weeks are actually studying law. It isn't enough to do law enforcement work. So what happens is the new officer simply mimics procedures of their training officer if they care enough to teach the officer in training instead of thinking up some stupid initiation ritual. So what happens is the new recruit ends up UNCRITICALLY duplicating the bad habits [and even illegal] of the training officer. In the world of business this training behavior is called, "cow pathing" by following procedures that have been in place for decades.

Laws change every year. State penal codes are revised every year. Retired Justice Department official, Ronald Gainer, reported that in 1982 [42 years ago] the criminal code was in 50 different titles amounting to 23,000 pages of federal law. After two years of research, a colleague counted only those statutes that could be prosecuted separately and estimated some 30,000 criminal offenses. The Drug Abuse Prevention and Control section of the code-Title 21 alone is more than 130 pages long! And yet there are even more laws if Federal Regulations to enforce Congressional acts are counted. Only counting laws that have the force of federal criminal penalties there are an estimated 10,000 to 300,000 (that’s right--three hundred thousand) laws. Think about that the next time you speak to a federal agent, or police officer! See: Many Failed Efforts To Count Nation’s Federal Criminal Laws.

The number of laws alone is justification enough to plead the fifth amendment if questioned by the police...remember that.

So, officer Clontz hasn't updated his knowledge of U.S. law for over 35 years. Most laws are not known intuitively---that is why there are law degrees. In order to apply the law, one must actually think because a particular context of an incident may not meet all the elements of a crime. Acting on reflex in law enforcement can be disastrous. In one of the two police academies I have attended, the instructor warned us that a choke hold (a new procedure taught in the 1990s) could cause a stroke if a clump of cholesterol breaks off in a vein and passes to the brain of the victim. Trying out YouTube MMA techniques on citizens (and children) is not a good idea.

One purpose of police officer training is to protect the city from lawsuits by having officially accepted procedures taught to officers (and documented) --the Police Proficiency Course (PPC) is proof that an officer has been trained using a firearm. The driving training course for officers serves the same purpose even if the officer is an "intuitively" good driver. The same principle should apply to knowledge of the law and de-escalation techniques.

The entire comportment of the Chief of Police says that he is looking for and seeks to provoke conflict--that is what the psychopathic smile is all about.

 

Equip the robots with lethal force and turn them loose under police control center guidance. Let the criminals beware, because the robots don't care whether anybody "had a happy childhood" or not. If crimes are committed, they can render the perps harmless or totally 'neutralized'. THAT is what we need, and THAT is so often what we do not have, thanks to all the bleeding heart liberals..

 

Dear reader, If you click on the "ignore" button of a profile, none of their fascist posts will appear on screen. It is the best feature of this board!

 

Interesting. Every story I can find about the Stone thing is between Jan 10th and Jan 20th, with the later ones claiming he was being investigated by the Capital Police and the FBI. And then nothing since Jan 20th.

I'm guessing they prolly figured out it was what Stone said it was- a “poorly fabricated AI generated fraud" and that's why no one is bothering with any updates to the story.

 

eeehhhh no thx

(caution: extreme sci-fi violence, lol)

 

American Fascism

“All institutions, including the church, are inherently demonic.”—Paul Tillich​

There are multiple forms of the demonic in the realization of life. One demonic force, and the most important in Tillich’s theology, is that of ideological objectification that transforms people into objects, and things—that is the essence of dehumanization. There are “demonic structures,” or “structures of evil” that can determine our consciousness and decision-making.

Law enforcement and the American judicial systems know how effective raw violent power is inside the jails and prisons which is why they want the same efficient technical policies for open civil society.

One way to define fascism is by Dr. L.W. Britt's fourteen empirical characteristics of fascism, or writer Umberto Eco's list of fourteen very similar characteristics of Ur-Fascism (Eternal Fascism) as the definition of fascism. In “The Anatomy of Fascism,” (2004)(pdf.) Robert O. Paxton's offers his more dynamic historical definition.

Emergency Update From Chille | 03/28/24
​

 

I've always thought that it's a sign of advanced cowardice to put anybody on "ignore", whether they say 'nice' things about you or not! If all a person wants is some kind of 'safe-space', feel-good 'echo chamber', then clearly they need to avoid political forums of any sort. It's rough and tumble in here -- a necessary byproduct of freedom of speech.

 

So, it turns out that the fascist whore, the dishonorable Judge Ann E. Zimmerman, is in fact a fascist whore.

Judge Ann Zimmerman of Las Vegas; ethical gremlin

The state of Nevada presented Kimberly A. Wanker with a law license in 1991 after she Missouri Law School in Kansas City.

The Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline has charged Annie with engaging in the following misconduct.

• Presided over hearing when she knew plaintiff not given notice of the hearing
• Granted defendant’s motion even though the plaintiff was not present and despite the fact she acknowledged on the record the plaintiff was not noticed for the hearing
• Failed to be candid and honest with ethics investigators (Up yours, said Annie!)
• Failed to act impartially and fairly with litigants
• Engaged in ex parte (one-sided) communications

All that remains now is to see what if any punishment is meted out to Judge Zimmerman by the enablers for Judicial Misfits sitting on the Nevada Supreme Court.

As we speak (ca. November 2015), Annie continues to sit on the Las Vegas Township Justice Court in Las Vegas, Nevada.

 

Retired state Supreme Court Justice Michael Douglas will help launch a new center to review claims of innocence in Nevada criminal cases.
May 19, 2021

Toni Ann Joes, executive director and founder of the Innocence Center of Nevada, estimated that 250 to 550 people sitting in Nevada prisons have been convicted of crimes they did not commit. In the past 20 years, she added, 20 people have been exonerated for felonies in Nevada after they had served a combined total of 255 years behind bars.
Former (retired) Nevada Supreme Court Justice Robert Langford (Husband of Judge Ann E. Zimmerman) is a founding member.

So her actual name is "Ann E. Zimmerman Langford."