Pecker testimony reveals backroom deals that helped Trump win 2016

Good! Let's keep it that way.

 

You do this every time.

The actual, complete, unabridged indictment is available online. Will you ever take the trouble to educate yourself before posting?

 

If all of that were true, or any of it, this trial would not be taking place.

 

Trump's only "policy" is "Everybody has to do what I want for as long as I live!"

 

How many Trump supporters would be outside the courthouse screaming "lock her/him up!" if Hillary or Biden were on trial for anything?

 

As yet, they show no signs of that. Is it realistic to think that just because Trump has been indicted by multiple jurisdictions, Biden must also be crooked? That doesn't seem logical to me.

 

Biden is crooked.

 

Does it seem logical that Biden would have caused a delay?

Unlike Trump, Biden doesn't tell his AG who to investigate or when. Yours is a question for Garland.

 

LOL the bullshit detector is redlining

 

I'd ask you for proof, but it is a well known fact that there is none.

 

I'm not familiar, but it sounds like a hoot!

 

the laptop alone is proof enough. Just wait until the DOJ is run by the GOP

 

It was, for four years.

 

Come on! You don't give a twopenny stuff about 'crooked.' All you want is anyone who will allow you to have your toys no matter how crooked they are.

 

Indeed. Gotta wonder what is being planned as a result of the election being "rigged". Looks like the Trump crowd is looking for an excuse to do more violence.

 

does it surprise anyone that Trump used the National Enquirer to con his supporters?

 

Even Trump's pecker was forced to testify against him. Unfortunately for the prosecution, the case seems to be crumbling under it's own weight. In normal times, we could just stand back and let it fall. But this is a New Yuck judge and jury, lol. The normal judicial restraints do not apply to Mr. Trump.

 

"the case seems to be crumbling under it's own weight."

yes, lot of evidence, even recorded calls of trump himself talking, not looking good for Trump imo

 

I can't find anything with which I disagree.

 

Did it reveal backroom deals, the Steele dossier, that failed to get Hillary elected?

 

And you all do this every time: you make claims of illegality and when challenged you say, "uh, read the indictment". You do so because there's no way in hell you can defend your position and you know it.

A claim was made. I challenged the claiment to support his claim. So far, multiple people have failed to do so. Perhaps I'm not the one that's uneducated in the topic?

 

I agree. But you know the Leftists don't want it to stay that way.

 

Still can't explain how Trump "do it" that makes it illegal?...lol

 

Still can't support your claim? We're all shocked! Shocked I say!...lol

 

WBK, does Agent oranges have 88 felony counts against him?

If the answer is YES (and it is), go pound sand and shed some MAGA tears. They are all listed in the 4 indictments.