To the anti-Muslim crowd here: what say you of this?

that is a blatant lie.

 

What say you?

I say that once again I find the feigned outrage by some on the left, to be absolutely, completely, and totally, hypocritical.

Not to mention, as well as completely, politically expedient and self serving.

Given these leftists have told us for weeks now that this is just A-OK:

http://www.rawstory.com/rawreplay/2...rotesters-surround-muslim-man-at-white-house/ .

After being told for a couple of weeks how, how this is perfectly legitimate as a form of political discourse in this nation.

http://www.politicalforum.com/curre...on-protesters-suspended-calling-out-sick.html

After attempting to excuse, justify, and ignore things like this:

http://www.politicalforum.com/curre...-gov-walker-rally-where-mainstream-media.html

Now suddenly we are to be outraged at this kind of behavior.



As has become all to common, and predictably typical of the liberal left, the leftists yet again tell us all, to do as they say, and not as they themselves do.

Seems that yet again the the liberal leftists can't help themselves from yet again demonstrating exactly why the people should vote them out of office and out of political power.

Because as the abject hypocrite's the liberal left, demonstrates it's own self to be, it also demonstrates the utter and complete arrogance and elitism that exists on the left.

The very same elitism and arrogance, which led these liberals on the left to ignore our law, and our Constitution.

In order to supplant the rule of law, and Constitutional governance.

With their own socialist agenda, in direct opposition to the clearly expressed will of the majority, and the American Citizenry.

 

You're not even American. And from most of your posts on this forum, you seem to know precious little about what goes on here.

 

There's no need to be dishonest. The TP runs on the issue of small goverment and low taxes.

 

There are laws around the country that prohibit certain kinds of business on Sundays, like alcohol sales and car sales and a variety of other oddities, so people can go to church!


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_law

 

Most modern liberals know precious little about anything but, towing the national socialist party line, all the while claiming to "love democracy" as they seek to enslave as all National Socialists in Human History have sought to do, see Stalin, See, Adolph Hitler, See Pol Pot, See Hugo Chavez.

Yep they all hold things in common ideologically, and frankly in practice as well where this President is concerned.

I mean fathom this people, for the first time in our nation's history, a sitting President has sought to continue to subject, and subjugate the Citizens of these States United, as well as the State's governments as well, to and Un-Constitutional act of Congress. Despite knowing full well that the law had been ruled Un-Constitutional by a Federal Court, and knowing full well that the Obama administration had in-fact not filed for a stay of the ruling, thus making continued attempt at enforcement of the law commonly known as "Obama care" an Un-Constitutional act, of both agression, as well as extortion by this President, and his entire cabinent, since none have resigned in protest of this Un-Constitutional abuse of the Citizens of the Unites States.

And no one, is supposed to even mention the word, ***whispers***I M P E A C H M E N T

 

You know what I meant, no need to get cute. Meaning Allah is the only God. He knew why those people were out there, and yes he knew it was going to cause trouble that's why he wore it.

 

Which federal court? what about the other federal courts?

 

Christian law is a huge threat? Oh yeah? Really?

Back that up instead of making baseless claims.

BTW, America is ALWAYS capitalized. Show some respect or else I'll blame public education for your faux pas. You wouldn't want that would you?

Alas, you failed to capitalize 3 words in one sentence. Could be a record here.

 

Surely you don't need the links. All around the country, as motions are filed and ruled on, Obama care is coming apart at the seams. They (meaning federal judges around the country) are carefully and meticulously dissecting this bill and throwing out all the parts that are blatantly unconstitutional like (mandating payment if you don't have it, violations of the Commerce Clause, etc...).

But here's the skinny: When it's all said and done, and after the SCOTUS rules that indeed, Obamacare is unconstitutional, this healthcare fiasco will end up with a few adjustments here and there, which could have been accomplished 2yrs ago with reforming what needed to be reformed had all politicians involved, just did their (*)(*)(*)(*) job.

But no. Stretch-face Pelosi, Hunch-back Reid, and the Devils Spawn Obama's leftist brain cells don't want to do that. Putting themselves into the limelight, at your expense, is the most important thing. It's called - An Ego Trip...

They pitched it, you liberals bought it, and now when it gets overturned, you're most likely going to blast off into the stratosphere with spittle flying, eye-buldging rage.....

Sad really.

 

How many do they have in Congress?

 

They have two. Keith Ellis and Andre Carson. Both Muslims, and both Democrats. Go figure.....

But in reality, you should really count all the Democrats and so, the answer would be half of Congress are Muslims.

 

Point taken. But I think we need to step back just a little. America is a religious nation but the religion of influence is Christianity. Most of the members of Congress profess either Protestantism or Catholicism. They may not use their religious beliefs overtly but it seems to me that their concordance with the majority of Americans who are Christians ensures that another religion will not be permitted to impose its cultural/legal system over the current Judeo-Christian common law-derived system.

Personally I would be opposed to Sharia or any law that was primarily a religious law - and yes I realise the law as it stands now in most Ango-Saxon (culturally) nations is a mix and influenced by Canon Law. But hey it works, right?

 

hmmm

probably because it won't get a look in from people living in a modern industrialised democracy ... thats why American evangelicals went to africa to spread their poisonous anti gay agenda - so that they could encourage their fellow christians to kill gays there ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uganda_Anti-Homosexuality_Bill

 

if christians return to biblical law you could sell your daughter into slavery.

as well as stone people.

 

Don't be ridiculous.

 

book burning was more a speciality of the christians

http://choco-jesus.blogspot.com/2010/09/brief-history-of-book-burning.html

and there are pleny more .. Athanasius of Alexandria ordered the burning of books - and that was before Pope Theophilus ordered the destruction of the library of alexandria.

not saying Muslims weren't into it as well ... but it has a much longer tradition, and more significant legacy, in christendom.

 

I would recommend you don't use hate sites when researching history.

it tends to make you appear not very well informed.

there is plenty of academic literature on this period and the evidenc eis clear that the first crusade was NOT a war of self defence.

as for the conquering of the Iberian peninsula, if you have a problem with that, you must have a much bigger problem with the invasion of the new world by christians. at least Muslims treated the local population better than the new world peoples were treated by christians.

jews were much better off under Muslim ruile than they had been under the visigoths - and than they were when christian rule returned to spain.

 

Why would my statement be ridiculous?

You see, this is what gets me about the left. Collectivism is the key to their success. And, it's the platform the left stands on - Govt Control, Unions, Everyone's a victim, Socialism, etc.....

But when tying the collectivist democrats to that collectivism (i.e., democrats supporting tyrannical Muslims and/or democrats support the injection of radical Muslim thinking into society and then getting busted doing it), then all of the sudden, the democrats want to start acting like individualists (i.e. well, I vote for democrats that support collectivist ideas, but you can't hold me accountable for that, etc...)

And so, here's what we know:

- The two people that are in congress that are Muslims, are both Democrats
- The democrats unequivocally support leftist Muslims and their ideas
- Democrats would rather live on their knees, than die on their feet fighting against Sharia Law

You (not meaning you specifically) voted for it, now you support it and be held accountable for it.

 

so is violence against women only committed by muslims?

it seems interesting to me that so many peole bring this up, yet don't give a flying (*)(*)(*)(*) about the high rates of spousal murder and domestic violence in their own country, don't give a flying (*)(*)(*)(*) about sex trafficking of girls from various countries and organ trafficking when they have outlived their usefulness, don't care about attacks on women in the congo, and generally don't care about female victims of abuse when the perpetrators are not muslims.

It makes me sick that people get all het up about violence against women when they can use it as an excuse to attack Islam, bt in fact couldn't give a flying (*)(*)(*)(*) about violence against women.

 

If anything, they blame the "feminazis" for exaggerating and wanting to suppress 'freedom' when the same thing in their own country is up for discussion.

Bigotry and hypocrisy are ugly companions in debate.

 

Well, you have forgotten what Islam and Musilms have done for the western world. I posted on pg 4, could anyone tell what happened to Achea, and the philosphers of Achea? I can tell you.
The romans took them over. If not for their love in greek culture, we would have nothing on Achea. No trojan war. No philosphers. No beigining for modern science. When the Roman empire fell, what happened?
The Byzantines took over (Technically still roman, but the west fell). These preserved knowledge in the middle ages, and one of the few empires still in the middle ages.
And what happened when the byzantines fell? The Turks came in, and captured Byzantuim. They could have destroyed the knowledge of Achea, but instead, the knowledge was moved to Baghdad, as it was the center of Islam at the time. Theey were responsible for improving on the ideas of Aristotle, and the beginning of true science. It's a shame that Genghis Khan's hord came in, and sacked it.
You may ask, why do I care about the science of Achea, and the philosphers.
The science, pretty obvious, when it came to Europe during the crusades, they used it took start making experiments, and to improve upon the old. Europe once again, had a scientific method. This was important during the age of enlightment.
And for the philosphers, Thomas Aquinas used Aristotle logic, to improve the lives of christians, this evuantally led to the protestant reform.

 

Maybe you shouldn't wake up early in the morning because none of what you said about either of those Congressmen makes a (*)(*)(*)(*)ing bit of sense.

Example: Andre Carson help passed a bill in 2008 that fights against HIV/AIDS in Africa.

 

Yeah, we could also go back to Donkeys for transportation.....Shall we wait another thousand years for Muslims to come around?

 

Well, you should love that then, being that you defend the Muslims and they hate and kill gays all the time. Should fit in with your hate for Jews too...they don't think too kindly of them either...In fact unless you're a Muslim, they don't like you either...you're just a lowly infidel.