Would you consider Sex Before Marriage is morally wrong?

Not really, the function itself is not that big a deal. Being able to enjoy being with your partner afterwards is much more important. Happy couples do not base their happiness on the sex.

 

No, your comment merely proves you are anti-human. Sex is natural, and for most people satisfying sex with a compatible partner is essential to a happy and satisfying life. Evolution made us want sex A LOT. Denying this fact for the sake of some fabricated religious ideal is just stupid.

One of the poorest priorities being wedding-night virginity.

Who said it did? It's not even a question of "good in bed." It's a question of compatibility, of complementary desires. I know a woman who said she found out on her honeymoon that she married the wrong man. Three kids and 55 years later, they are still unhappily married.

 

Sorry, but that sounds to me like someone who doesn't know how to enjoy sex, nor how to ensure his partner does.

True, but if a couple does not have a mutually satisfying sex life, their chances of happiness drop considerably.

 

I'd say it's about half and half.

I've been with women that I was very emotionally compatible with but not sexually, and I've been with the reverse. Both situations suck.

It's only when both emotions and sexuality are satisfied that a relationship tends to last.

I've only been lucky enough to find that recently.

 

Yeah, and beacuse of attitudes like this there are today a lot of fatherless kids in the inner cities today depending on the U.S. taxpayers to care for them and support them!

"Have sex now, assume adult responsibility later!"



The results of a promiscuous, modern society!

^


[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0J3vgcE5i2o"]YouTube - ‪Nelly Furtado - Promiscuous ft. Timbaland‬‏[/ame]

 

Have sex now; accept adult responsibility later!

 

That doesn't even relate to what we are talking about. Is maritail rape better many people ignore it. http://www.crisisconnectioninc.org/pdf/US_History_of_Marital_Rape.pdf
Rape isn't about sex it's about power.

 

Are you married?

 

The responses of this thread pretty much sum up why US is in decline since 50'.

A nation is only as strong as the families that make up the nation.

 

I know, right?
A bunch of uptight weirdos are all angsty because they don't get laid enough. The country would be better if more people would just get laid.
I DO have a sneaking suspicion that some people value virginity because they don't want their partner to realize that they don't know what they're doing!

But yeah, the world would be a better place if these uptight weirdos could get laid!

 

Are you saying it was the girls fault because she wasn't married?

 

Virginity means nothing to me. This is not even about virginity.

 

I don't see how your questions have anything to do with sex before marriage. The problem is not sex before marriage; it's irresponsible and promiscuous sex, and those things can occur before and after marriage. It isn't marriage that makes sex responsible and monogomous; loves does that.

We can promote a healthy sex code without associating it with marriage. The problem is that our society to too (*)(*)(*)(*) obsessed with letting the free market control these kind of things, and unfortunately, sex really sells.

 

From 4 million B.C. until about 12000 B.C. humans were free to engage in sex freely, as there was no Almighty God then. It was only when the real earth(and rest of universe) was created in 4000 B.C. by (choose a God) that a problem began. Along with slavery, hiearchy, racial superiority and empire, came work, order, blessed/cursed, and God.
Then because man learned to write letters, names became important, so heredity became important, so marriage was invented to perpetuate the distinction between the chosen few, and the cursed many.

 

I love the fascist thinking.

 

To the 5 people who voted that it is morally wrong to have sex before marriage - what do you say to all those people who have never been married?
What about those people in relationships for many years but who have never gotten married? You mean to say that those loving couples shouldn't have sex because they are not married?

Good grief. That is the attitude of people living in the 18th century, not today. There is nothing at all wrong with sex before marriage.

After all, who the heck buys a car without taking it for a test drive first!!!

 

So sex without the intention of having a baby is immoral and selfish?

That's the most stupid, idiotic argument I've read. Most couples would be living boring and dull lives if they had an obligation to procreate every time they got randy.

By the way, the desire to have sex is natural, not immoral. I am sure even your Bible will state this.

 

I'm one of the five. I also said that it depends on your moral code. If you believe in nothing, you have not defied any code of morality.

And, as I stated, which promotes a healthier society, having a moral code or not? There will always be cases where people defy the odds, but the reality is that a healthy society follows some moral codes.

 

A nation is only as strong as the economic acumen of its industry leaders and policymakers.

"Family matters" are mostly a secondary concern. The most prosperous nations have native populations with small families, low marriage rates, and a heavy dependence on immigration for population growth.

Immigrants, more often than not, make up for low native birth rates and are much more traditional about marriage.

America is unusual in that we have a native group (blacks) with a high birth rate and a high single parenting rate, but in the end, their significance among the general population will dwindle as Latinos and Asians outnumber them over time.

How the black community reforms itself is mostly an internal thing, since the government can only do so much.

 

Sex is going to happen before marriage whether you like it or not. It's better to encourage using protection and birth control than to pretend that everyone should wait until marriage.

For the record, I've never gotten a girl pregnant, and I haven't always used protection.

Considering how often people have sex with or without marriage, statistically, not getting pregnant is the norm.

 

Oh really? So, do you think that the "Greatest Generation" was less moral than the one before it?

 

No they aren't. Where do people come up with such silly ideas.

 

Moral code? A moral code based in an old book of 2.000 years old?

Yeah, but how many people anti-sexual act are actively peacefull. How many of you defend the not use of violence? For example. I know that I am using ad-hominem comment.

But I am tired of the American hipocresy. You can see very well extreme violence, but that a woman shows her tits you see that harmfull. Then no! Sex is something natural and normal. And many times the people that don't practice sex a lot of times are the most violent.

Sex is something even good if it is done correctly, it is taking precautions and by consentiment of your sex partner.

Sex is only the act of loving other person, and you don't need to be married or anything to show love to other person.

The decadence of the society comes from other places, if you want to tell it. For example the defense of the authoritarism, or the violence. But not for having a vision more "libertarian" in sex questions.