Why Perry Can't Win

Can you name any company that Obama has nationalized?

 

Margot; Can you name one that by Executive Regulation or Democratic Congressional Legislation over the past 30 years that has NOT, in effect made Federal Control ("Nationalized") the principle objective...

 

Name a single company the US government has nationalized.

 

In all actuality....The only way Rick Perry can't win. Is if he decides to drop out himself.


Fact.

 

http://www.wordwebonline.com/search.pl?w=nationalized

Margot; I'd rather you mention some business/sector, which Government doesn't regulate or control in some way, but I'll give you a couple newer ones....

College Tuition's, Home Buyers, Health Care, Banking, Manufacturing, Farming, Energy Producers, Employers, On line poker players among hundreds of others, probably every one is controlled by your Federal Government and well on the way to total control. If you name one, it would have to fall under "State Right", adhered to by the Federal (rare), then aside from some overlapping regulation, State Governments make a fool out of themselves, you don't need to OWN something to control it...

 

Regulation isn't nationalization.

 

Well Said.....Obama and with his liberal side-kick (witch) Hillery Clinton are planning and working around the Constitution barrier.
Thus their close work and allience with the United Nations, and allowing interviening of outside sources in mandateing new rules and restrictions.....For a one World Goverment.....Headed by four selected individuals.
All part of being a New World Allience and Goverment.
In which Americans will feel the socialistic rule from.

 

Couldn't have said it better myself. But then I'm not college educated.

 

They should, Karl Rove built them in his mad scientist laboratory.

 

George W Obama has not only continued what Bush got started,but he has accelerated it as well.

 

And Perry will take the handoff from Obummer pick up the baton and run with it. There isn't two different parties there is both sides of the same coin and the sock puppets who represent them.

 

This of course is assuming your boys retain control of congress.. that doesnt look good.

I'm glad your happy to support destroying the country through gridlock.. its worked great so far.. after your boys ( I include Neolibs in "your boys") totally wrecked the country in the firstplace.

Haha "red" states are the ones most dependent on government handouts.. your a gem.

 

You don't know the difference between nationalized and regulated? Nationalized has to do with ownership. All companies under every president have been subject to Federal Laws so by your definition, everyone and ESPECIALLY Reagan, Bush Sr. and Bush the Idiot were just some nationalizing sons a guns!

 

Im not a Dem but prior to Obama:

1) the housing market has collapsed
2) the financial system had collapsed
3) the deficit was at 1.4 Trillion per year
4) the Dow was at 6500
5) Bin Ladin was still on the run

After Obama:

1) the housing market still sucks
2) the financial system is improved
3) the deficit is moving lower
4) The Dow is at 11,500
5) Bin Ladin is Dead

Not perfect but a definate improvement over the previous clowns.

 

I'm a Ron Paul supporter, have been since 2007. However, the elist and the GOP brass want Perry. They always knew he would run since he went to the bilderberg meeting years ago. The media and GOP will force him down your throat and the ultra conservatives in the south love things shoved down their throat.

 

http://www.wordwebonline.com/search.pl?w=nationalized

Margot and NoParty; Please take your argument up with the dictionary, I can only offer your their definition and you DON'T need to own something to control it.....

I don't disagree, that from the "Progressive era" (1890-1930) on, regulation has been directed at Nationalizing the private sector, but it went extreme under TARP and today the stated goal of Obama/Polosi/Reid (Single payer HC) and Maxine Waters on the "Oil Industry.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUaY3LhJ-IQ"]Maxine Waters threatens to nationalize U.S. oil industries - YouTube[/ame]

Marcny; I also like many of Ron Paul's ideas, but if you think a 76 year old, with his foreign policy ideas can win the primary race, your only kidding yourself. I'd also suggest media and the Liberals are opposing Perry, because they simply fear he could win the primaries and beat Obama, in turn repealing Obamacare and a dozen other pet projects, not the "ultra conservatives", whoever they are....

 

Then like I said, in addition to Obama; Reagan, Bush, Bush the Idiot etc... were all Socialists according to your definition because since they allowed regulation of banks (seemingly, the only criteria your require), they "nationalized" them.

There is a difference between regulate and control. Can Obama tell the CEO of BofA that his company must disclose interest rates to borrowers? Well duh. Is that regulation or nationalization? Well gee whiz. He's "Controlling" some of the banks actions so I guess according to you, it's nationalization.
BTW, every company in every nation in the world is "nationalized" by that ridiculous interpretation.

 

Biased liberal thinking is mostly wrong, and it definitely sucks!

 

I completely agree!

Although I get the sense that the difference between us is that I also think biased Conservative thinking is mostly wrong and it sucks too...