EPA: Regulations would require 230,000 new employees, $21 billion

Obama and His EPA are out of control. The law means nothing to them


http://dailycaller.com/2011/09/26/epa-regulations-would-require-230000-new-employees-21-billion/

The Environmental Protection Agency has said new greenhouse gas regulations, as proposed, may be “absurd” in application and “impossible to administer” by its self-imposed 2016 deadline. But the agency is still asking for taxpayers to shoulder the burden of up to 230,000 new bureaucrats — at a cost of $21 billion — to attempt to implement the rules.

The EPA aims to regulate greenhouse gas emissions through the Clean Air Act, even though the law doesn’t give the EPA explicit power to do so. The agency’s authority to move forward is being challenged in court by petitioners who argue that such a decision should be left for Congress to make.

 

230,000 new Obama voters on the public dole?

No thanks.

 

230,000 more jobs? no thanks, we don't need those.

 

This is what leftists mean when they talk about a "jobs plan"

 

Paid for by who, chief?

 

So they are going to help put companies out of business by using the businesses tax money.

great Idea. You have to love the stupidity of this administration.

 

How many jobs will it cost? The government jobs mean little if it means companies have to layoff people and close plants.

 

They either comply with the clean air act or get shut down. Simple as that.

 

POLLUTION IN CHINA

 

The problem is Obama and the EPA may be doing this illegally. So you have no problem with this closing more Business and more people losing their jobs?

The court battle is just beginning

 

Great...lets create more unemployment...that is so cool. Anyone who thinks this is a good thing has to be an idiot Ubama voter.

 

Good petition (*)(*)(*)(*)ing China...see how far you get.

 

So this will increase government expense and will cost us jobs, cost retirement accounts because of stock losses and will drive up the cost of energy, which will drive up the cost of nearly everything and lower the standard of living of everyone, especially the poor and middle class.

Sounds like a great plan.

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/ea...n-tax-as-extent-of-pollution-is-revealed.html

China considering green tax as extent of pollution is revealed

China is considering implementing green taxes after a comprehensive new government survey revealed the extent of air and water pollution in the country.


(Growing the economy and creating jobs will require better environmental practices... not lesser.)

 

Sure they'll do there part...LMFAO!!!....if the Olympics are there....


How do you collect a green tax from someone who makes a dollar a week?

 

We are not China. You care nothing about the poor and middle class that will be severely hurt by Obama and the EPA.

 

Of course he doesn't.

 

From someone collecting unemployment and sucking The Democrat Provided Social Teet.......its pretty simple isnt it?

Im betting when that nipple goes dry.......you might reconsider.
.
.
.

 

Badmutha... what is worse is that when Montoya was asked where his entitlement checks came from... he did not know. He does not realize that he is taking directly out of the pockets of his fellow Americans. Now that we educated him, I don't think he cares.

These regulations would cripple industry, destroy real jobs that produce something, and destroy our ability to balance the budget or pay off the national debt.

 

Time to cut their funding to the bone.

 

How dare Americans demand to breathe clean air!!! Money is more important then the health of the American citizen.

 

Wait...you mean we get cleaner air AND we hire 230,000 new jobs? And this is bad because...?

 

Without the creation of wealth and economic prosperity, clean air is just a pipe dream. Government can either hinder economic growth and subsequent increase in prosperity, or it can get more and more in the way of producers until it collapses under the weight of the unsustainable welfare state, and then your children and grandchildren will have to suffer the sort of pollution that China suffers under in order to return to economic prosperity in some distant future.

Tooth fairy economics isn't going to save us from pollution and, anyway, who do you think is the biggest polluter in this country anyway? I'll give you a hint, it starts with a "g" and ends with "overnment."

 

Millions unemployed and a crappy economy and food prices up. This is what we need more jobs lost