Killing Osama and Ghadafi is wrong

More unsourced claims, with no context provided.

Besides which - which stings more words or bombs, war, occupation, and endorsement of sodomy?

 

Hardly unsourced.

Khadafi said it on video..........

 

Source me to them then.

And, what say you to this, Margot, you are becoming the Queen of a partial reply.

'Besides which - which stings more words or bombs, war, occupation, and endorsement of sodomy? '

 

Look it up on youtube.

Maybe you can endorse another mentally ill megalomaniac thug to rule Libya.

 

Your statements, Margot, you source me.

Third time;

And, what say you to this, Margot, you are becoming the Queen of a partial reply.

'Besides which - which stings more words or bombs, war, occupation, and endorsement of sodomy? '

 

I don't think Saddam got a fair trial and Osama had every chance to turn himself in and avail himself of due process. Ghadafi, well, he wasn't our problem. But let's face it, the government can kill anybody it wants, inside our outside America, whenever it wants to bad enough.

 

Indeed.

Now, what does that tell you about your successive Gov's, at least since JFK?

 

A Myth..... Are You High.

 

No I rebuked him for taking the governments side on the issue without making rational decisions with all the evidence laid out on the table, I was simply saying that the powers that be could label anyone a bad guy, and kill them, while everyone cheers, even you or I. We need to force our government to prove that people are bad before they kill them even if it is blatantly obvious, because the more slack we give them, the more corrupt and tyrannical they will become.

 

Are you?...

 

Good question............

 

I most definitely do not.

I am not a wild savage.

Want an example of a wild savage?

A true psychopath?

Now, also consider the position this person presently holds..

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fgcd1ghag5Y"]Hillary Clinton on Gaddafi: We came, we saw, he died - YouTube[/ame]

 

What do you care? Fair trials are anti-darwinism. If Bin Laden and Gaddafi can't defend themselves and nature weeds them out, doesn't that play right into your world view?

 

As long as the gov only kills the deserving and does not kill me, I'm good with it.

 

LOL...Phoebe, we may be politically distant, but can make me laugh at times.

 

Those who think that killing Bin Laden or Gadaffi was wrong are CLUELESS IDIOTS who have their heads buried deep in their money-making rectums !!!

When the HORRENDOUS CRIMES achieve such a CRITICAL MASS ...... and the PSYCHO CRIMINALS so dangerous..... no flipping TRIAL should even appear on any rational person's radar.

Assassinating a PSYCHO like Saddam, or, especially a HITLER ...... shouldn't even be a matter of a second's consideration: They should be exterminated as though they are a viper about to kill a child !

Of course, certain humans are MENTALLY DAMAGED FREAKS who can't tell their arse from their Left Nostril....and these believe as the Political Idiot Ron Paul does.

 

Loong, I am sure you are aware that there are those who walk among us who make false allegations against other people, all of the time.

One day it may happen to you. I hope not, but all it takes is for you to meet or cross the wrong person, for the allegation to spread, and you may have to answer it, no matter how false it may be.

Now, on the day that this happened, would you;

A) Want a trial?

B) Leap into an electric chair and shout 'Please fry me'

Which?

 

Which planet are you on ????

Cantcha distinguish between a Joe Blow on the street from a Bin Laden, Gadaffi, Pol Pot, Saddam, Hitler. etc.,......are you, and people like you flippin INSANE ?!?!??!?!?

WTF....the first "W" stands for "WHERE" ...... do you people come from ???

 

How familiar are you with the Nuremberg war TRIALS?

It's okay to say 'not very'.

Thanks

 

Gave a fair trial before execution?

 

Also, if war has been declared, is it not a war crime to kill prisoners who represent no threat?

 

I know more about WWII .....BOTH Theatres than you will ever know if you study that topic for the next TWO DECADES. 'Cause, that's been my hobby. And, you are light years from being close to my IQ.

I could probably name you ALL the significant generals, on BOTH SIDES....in BOTH THEATRES..... with, mebbe, small inconsequential errors.

So don't about something you know "didley squat" about compared to me.

As to the Nuremberg Trials......it's OK to try Secondary, or Tertiary Leaders ....and, OBVIOUSLY lower alleged culprits.

Although with some....like Himmler ....this butthole shoulda been assassinated the way his Stooge Heydrich was.

But, as with ALL Owebamarrhoidals, they miss the SALIENT POINT.

Granted, if one can capture a PSYCHO like the BAGHDAD MONSTER .....ALIVE.....then, one gives them a trial.

As far as I'm concerned.....they should be questioned ad infinitum for historical facts....then shot outa hand .....to save money. NO TRIAL.

But as I stated, I'm OK if these SUPER BUTTHOLES get a trial IF CAPTURED ALIVE.

However, we're talking about EXECUTION and/or ASSASSINATION of the SUPER PSYCHOS such as Bin Laden & Awlaki when they are AT LARGE......then ASSASSINATION is the MOST PREFERENTIAL SOLUTION.

As Graf Stauffenberg tried to do with the HITLER PSYCHO !!!

Of course IDIOTS like Ron Paul, and his brainless Idjit Followers woulda preferred to have Hitler NOT assassinated so that this SUPER BUTTHOLE would continue to MAIM & DESTROY a coupla million more !!!

GEDDIT ?!?!?

Because, if you still don't, you're a flippin IDIOT !

 

they actually killed Osama a few weeks or so after the attacks because he knew who was REALLY behind the attacks and knew too much.

 

it was but president obama had to do it because the country has become desensitized and blood thirsty since the republican administration

if he didn't have them assassinated it would have hurt him in the elections