How fast can skeptics prove that most of Flight 93 buried?

Let's see how fast the skeptics can prove that most of Flight 93 buried as they claim.


So far they have failed to in the following threads:

http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/...ly-lacking-flight-93-mostly-buried-claim.html
http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/...-lacking-claim-most-flight-93-had-buried.html
http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/203972-flight-93s-missing-proof.html
http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/214637-still-no-contact-shanksville-sources.html
http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/212735-tried-contacting-shanksville-sources-no-dice.html
http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/205834-fbi-claims-95-93-buried.html
http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/196971-flight-93-recovered-underground.html
http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/182383-heres-good-one.html

 

It takes exactly as fast as anyone genuinely seeking evidence to contact the people who were there, on the scene.

Those sources have been provided several times. Go directly to the evidence, don't wait for it to come to you.

 

How deep did they allegedly dig?

 

Well I take solace in knowing that you'll be handing him his ass for another 100 or so posts before this one gets shut down too.

If you want to know what happened, just ask someone; gee....and he doesn't get that.

Some truther.

 

Do you have photos and/or video of the Shanksville scene given to you by some of the Shanks scene workers?

 

Yes, I'd like to know too.

 

Anyone genuinely seeking evidence will contact the people who were there on the scene.

Those sources have been provided several times. Go directly to the evidence, don't wait for it to come to you.

 

Hannibal,

Do you have photos and/or video of the Shanksville scene given to you by some of the Shanks scene workers?

 

DDave,

Do you believe that most of Flight 93 buried as Hannibal and Patriot911 do?

 

yes we already know the source however.

​

 

Dr. Who is fiction.

My source is the hundreds of people who worked the scene in real life.

 

so is the 911 story. oh there is enough real added to give it an appearance of plausibility eh LOL

 

Single topic posters lose their allure quickly. Attention seeking is not truth seeking.

 

See the problem with truthers is they dont realize when they accuse the truth of being officially misrepresented, it is the truther who must do the proving.


As you pointed out the proof for the "official" story ,most of the plane being buried in its own crater,has been public and easy to access for years and years.


Man ,I havent been in this forum for awhile....I see the truthers havent made any headway in the pursuit of justice...lol.

 

Hannibal,

Do you have photos and/or video of the Shanksville scene given to you by some of the Shanks scene workers?

 

Well if it's so "easy," why don't you access this "proof" and post it and finally put this "silly conspiracy theory" to rest?

 

Which theory...yours about a plane being buried or the 9/11 twoofer nutjob conspiracies?

In the former, nobody cares other than you. I'm astounded that P911 and Hannibal give you any of their attention. You pose zero threat. I suppose there is a humorous quality to debating whether it is partly cloudy or partly sunny since the DNA proves 93 crashed there, witnesses prove it, the wreckage proves it, and, even the ATC tracking proves it.

In the latter, all of them have been disproven too. Silly doesn't begin to describe it.

Your move.

 

In a previous thread, you made a claim about me. I'm waiting for you to provide your evidence for that claim.

 

Interesting comment, I pose "zero threat." Insinuates some truthers do pose a threat which contradicts your claims that the truth movement is "irrelevant." lol

 

Perhaps I was wrong in what I recalled.

Now to move forward,

Do you have photos and/or video of the Shanksville scene given to you by some of the Shanks scene workers?

 

Hannibal, it's a simple question.

Requires only a "yes" or "no" answer.

 

You made a wild, unsubstantiated claim about me. Either produce evidence or apologize. The words 'if' and 'perhaps' should not appear in your apology.

Do one of these, then we can 'move forward'.

 

Zero threat in terms of debate-craft. The movement, in terms of uncovering something is irrelevant since there is nothing to uncover.

lol

 

You want me to apologize for something that might be true?!!



Fine, don't answer my simple question to you. You only make yourself look guilty by not answering.

 

Already 3 pages now and skeptics haven't proven a big ol' Boeing 757 had buried in the ground at Shanksville.

Not looking too good for them!