State-mandated “Sexual Brainwashing” Begins in California Schools

Gay Mafia & RACIST Open Borders groups like MECHA & La Raza

 

you should not persecute bulimics but you don’t accept bulimia because it inherently hurts the person with it

 

What you (or I) are "all for" or "don't mind" has nothing to do with what the government mandates. And the government has a long history of slipping down slopes.

 

is that a reson to acept what is wrong?

 

Great point! And, no, I do not think we should accept it.

(Isn't that what I've been saying?)

I'm glad you're finally starting to come around.

 

EXACTLY! Bulimia is a compulsive food addiction or "orientation" started early in life and become habitual by the powerful system of pleasure/reward...classical conditioning! Bravo!

We shouldn't accept it because it inherently [love to hear your definition of "inherently"] hurts the person with it. Like HIV does with anal tissues stretched to bleeding from penetration so blood to semen contact can kill more successfully [from the HIV virus's perspective].

Bueno! By jove I think you've finally got it. Compassion but not promition for DEVIANT BEHAVIORS THE BODY DIDN'T EVOLVE TO HANDLE WITHOUT ADVERSE EFFECTS TO HEALTH.

Finally! *lays down to take a well deserved nap*..

 

So its wrong to not correct an injustice because of fear someone will create new injustice of an opposite kind because of it. And instead I should support what’s right even if you need to fight against new wrongs because of it.

As an example
if I support gay marriage because I believe the reasons against it are bull(*)(*)(*)(*) I should try and see that gay marriage becomes legal and if anyone wants to make marrying an animal or a child legal and is so stupid as to cite the legal right of gays to marry to accomplish there goal I should find reasons that make sense to oppose that , like how gay marriage between consenting adults doesn’t harm people inherently or inherently risk harm to them or animals but children can be taken advantage of by force or trickery and animals can’t speak for themselves if they don’t want a human (*)(*)(*)(*)ing them and they can’t consent to legal arrangements exedra.
I should object only to what’s wrong

Rather than sacrifice the freedom of homosexuals who want to marry, in this case. So I don’t need to worry about it.

 

Define "injustice". You call it when people who have DCBs [dysfunctional copulatory behaviors] can't masquerade as heterosexual couples in marraige. I call it when blacks are sent to the back of the bus or hung from a tree merely because of their skin color.

Behavior is behavior. Race is race. Learn the difference. If you want the Supreme Court to recognize a class of people based on adopted behaviors, you're asking them to lay flat our entire basis of law: regulating human BEHAVIORS in order to establish our own social norms and tranquility defined by the majority.

 

: involved in the constitution or essential character of something



But sexuality does not seem to be learned though it is compulsive

Homosexuality is not inherently about anal sex

With anal sex you don’t need to stick a penis up there going slowly and using lube and a condom are good ways to avoid damage and hiv transmission

And though it would be unfortunate if your body’s is not designed for it if you have an inborn inclination for it then it is naturel

If it is learned and you can do it and enjoy it without harming yourself then natural or not it’s not wrong


whereas bulimia learned or inborn will bring harm upon you if you act on it regardless of what you do

 

•Violation of another's rights or of what is right; lack of justice.
• A specific unjust act;
an example you slandering people who want to marry by saying there trying to pretend at being hetero sexual seems unjust

 

Homosexuality is not adopted

Religion is yet we don’t support discriminating against some one for that

 

Look, you can stick a banana in your ear for all I care. Just don't ask the country to have the Supreme Court call it normal, or teach it to our kids as normal, and then give it special rights and privelges.

It is behavioral and adopted after birth. The agricultural industry has demonstrated for decades now that all mammals and some species of birds and even reptiles can be taught compulsive sexual behaviors by pairing a stimulus [the enticement object] and orgasm at a crucial point in life..usually just before or at the onset of puberty and the surge of "mount and thrust" hormones present in both males and females.

So it is learned, can be taught and once taught becomes compulsive/habitual.

It can be unlearned and untaught too with aversive conditioning and re-conditioning with rewards paired in another direction [they've found with all the other animals]. Though the original imprinting does seem to remain stubbornly dominant and difficult to completely stamp out.

That's the reality of it.

So should we teach children gay is OK, considering the irreversible nature of it's imprinting...should we represent that "Ok-ness" in allowing DCBs to marry? Or should we teach its base and raw mechanics as already known and practiced in the ag industry, and then have compassion for it but not promote it to we primates the most susceptible of the animal kingdom to suggestion and imprinting behaviors after birth?.

Monkey see, monkey do..

 

Well it may or may not b normal its uncommon relative to heterosexuality and i don’t want gay peephole to be treated specially i want them to be treated liken other people

You should not get a job because your gay jus like you should not lose one or be denied one for it

they should be able to marry marriage is not about breeding not right now if you want to change it to where you must have kids when you’re married and we formally and legally turn the instruction into a baby making and support network that would be different
Getting rid of those dead beat infertile and childless heterosexual marriages

People with kids who want to marry a non-parent or people who adopt would be bit of a grey area there though

so your explaining gay people away by them orgasming while thinking of the same gender before a hetero sexual drive pops up? Or are you saying we heterosexuals are not naturally hetero sexual but are desire for the other gender is also learned?

i don’t buy it

Situational homosexuality exists and in light of what you said i guess it can be learned you’ve changed my mind

Well done

but the notion that homosexuality in all or most people who have it is just the result of an early orgasm while thinking of the opposite gender seems suspicious

And the idea that telling kids about homosexuality as much as you would tell them about hetero sexuality turning them gay is far more suspicious

 

What BS. Then you don't really support it.

That's like saying I support this presidential nominee because I hate the other one.

Bad argument. FAIL

 

Roflmao!!!

 

Welcome home!

 

How clumsy of me ok how about i support people being free to do what makes them happy as long as they don’t hurt other or infringe on their freedom

and i support gay marriage because its an example of that while arguments against it like it will turn people gay or being gay is not naturel or that allowing gay marriage will lead to other forms of marriage like with animals or kids

Have turned out to be lies and manipulative agenda driven sensationalism of people who are enemys of that freedom

its speaking up for others before i need to speak up for myself and before im the only one left

hopefully learning the moral of this story

First they came for the Jews and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for the Communists and I did not speak out because I was not a Communist.

Then they came for the trade unionists and I did not speak out because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak out for me.

 

get out of my house

 

Your words make me dizzy. Can you please try to construct proper sentences? Maybe even a paragraph every now and then?

And, I know this is asking a lot, some capitalization and punctuation would go a long way in getting others to follow and engage.

 

Mmm, yea, well.. you were wrong.

 

not so sure about that

 

Was your school 'promoting' heterosexual sex/lifestyle, or merely teaching you about it?

 

it can be hard to tell some times


[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDoQFcQEpOQ"]Meaning of Life - Sex Education - YouTube[/ame]

 

So, you got your education from YouTube?

Wow does that ever explain a lot!

 

They won't, since this issue is about validation as much as indoctrination. Since this will be state and/or federally mandated and, unlike Parochial and private schools, tax-payer funded, the gay community believes it receives the appearance of legitimacy.