Whoa. What a load of ****.
vman, where did you get the idea that a subsequent government loses any right to previously frozen assets?
You want to debate the issue, right?
No. His actions are contrary to good judgment, the law and our country’s interests. His cowardice and ego are driving these decisions.
Why isn't there an option for "Under 70"?
And I thought that you had a basis for your claims.
You're like Pigpen from the Peanuts---carrying around a cloud of goofy attempts at analogies.
You making claims out of thin air is not "debating", my friend.
I tried; you failed.
There you go again.
I'll just take your lack of any authority as an admission that you flat out made up your claims.
So, you have no authority for your proposition.
Just admit it. You made it up, because it aligns with your desire to criticize Obama.
Where are these "recommendations"?
That's a conclusion without any support, my fabricating friend.
And a terrible attempt at an analogy.
The assets were frozen, and you're...
Whew! Thanks for the permission to LOL.
Where do you get the idea that a subsequent government magically loses the claim to frozen assets?
I agree with her this time.
It was frozen, not "confiscated". Did you think that it went into the general fund? A special piggy bank that eliminated the ownership of the money?
So much winning!
That's their job, isn't it?
It was a lot less than that. Don't you even know where the money came from?
Yes, because they're all exactly the same.
Separate names with a comma.