I prefer millions of private administration and possessions over a single monopolistic government administration and possession.
I think that the government should only settle land ownership claims, not administer possession and use of land. We beat the commies in the cold...
I thought you said that private land ownership was feudalism. Are you taking that back now?
Is my neighbor who owns a 50'x100' lot a feudal lord or not?
So my neighbor who has a house on a 50x100 lot is a feudal lord? I'll be sure to tell him. Maybe he's a duke, or an earl. He'll be so pleased.
Actually, feudalism was a system in which land was granted as a payment for regular military service. Check your definitions.
Which of congress's enumerated legislative powers do you think would allow federal control of firearms?
Perhaps your understanding of feudalism is erroneous. Could you please provide the definition you're using when you use the term?
Any state can leave the union in whatever manner it wishes. There is no prohibition on a state leaving. It is a reserved power.
In that case they wouldn't be a felon, right?
I don't advocate feudalism. Nor do I agree with your idea that the state should administer all land. I'm in favor of private ownership of land.
Rule by private landowners? I don't think I suggested that. But have fun with your straw man.
Also, can you provide a definition of feudalism?
How can you call someone a felon who hasn't been convicted of a felony?
If one isn't convicted of a felony, then obviously one isn't a felon.
I'm not down with feudalism. I don't want the state to exercise monopoly over all the land?
Yeah, I don't want the state to exercise that monopoly over all the land.
Yeah, I think that the state, if we need one, should stick to settling property disputes between citizens. I don't think the state should own all...
I can't get on board with your idea that the state should have a monopoly on all property. I prefer distributed ownership.
Which of congress's legislative powers would have allowed it to make pot illegal in the first place?
It sounds like you don't care what the constitution says.
Based upon which of Congress's enumerated legislative powers?
There is no economic rent from labor exploitation.
Oh, there you are again with your truncheons and bayonets. I'm sure you're winning hearts and minds with our calls to violence.
As I said in my previous post. Society could use the power of boycott against contract breakers.
She could engage a socially respected...
But you can see how contractual disputes would be agreed to beforehand? So what other sorts of disputes are you talking about?
Separate names with a comma.