Majority of the spending Bush authorized was spent during his administration. Any spillover was also spent during the Obama administration;...
That's a very poor understanding of government economics (not that I've ever heard someone refer to it as "Government economics"). Government...
Pretty much everything in bold is demonstrably wrong. That's probably a very kind way of putting it.
The labour market is improving, so clearly we can start raising rates again... Right?
This is a huge misunderstanding of Microeconomics. That is a nice way of putting it.
Then what do you account for the amount of unemployed persons and job vacancies? It sounds like what we could expect from structural...
2 unemployed persons for every 1 available job. That is a milestone compared to the initial 9 unemployed for every 1 job since the beginning of...
We've been very generous with unemployment benefits. I sure as well would take advantage of that, and many others apparently thought the same.
They're using that talking point because it is a basic fundamental point in economics to make. Even Krugman understands that much, however, to...
So he's an idiot because he doesn't believe in God? How exactly does that work? Maybe it's precisely his condition that shifted him away from...
I never understood why the arbitrary talking point is a family of four... Most minimum wage earnings are not married and don't not have children,...
Interestingly enough, Paul Krugman (2010) admits in a textbook Essentials of Economics, if unemployment becomes more attractive because of the...
It doesn't demonstrate how silly it was, because it provides zero evidence. On the other hand, there is already plenty of evidence that shows...
Actually, Krugman lost a debate a couple of years ago against Spanish economist Pedro Schwartz and resorted to nothing but ad hominem attacks....
Krugman also seems to believe that we're only prosperous when the economy is experiencing a bubble... Someone phone Yellen and tell her to...
Maybe it should pander to the strippers and the Welfare recipients. That seems to be working.
It's not semantics, but a matter of simple logic. Facts need to be supported with evidence. Hearsay isn't evidence. It only sounds simple...
That's not an interview. That is a biography. Also, that is exactly the hearsay I was referring to. The author is quoting David Stockman, but not...
There is no evidence David Stockman personally advocated Trickle Down. There is only evidence that he claims to have advocated for it. That's...
It's not semantics because they are not the same, as I just explained to you. And I don't understand what failure you are referring to....
It actually happens all the time. One particular year, a CEO can receive a 25% increase in compensation, and the following year can receive a 30%...
That's false. There is very little evidence that, other than hearsay, and the poster is not a politician nor an economist. Basic understanding of...
Trickle Down does not exist as an economic theory. No politician or economist has ever advocated for its implementation. - - - Updated - - -...
I'm not giving a pass to anyone. If you want to take advantage of others, go right ahead. We all understand the social programs, such as Social...
Elaborate.
Separate names with a comma.