The court is not deciding if inciting an insurrection is a prosecutable offense [for Trump] because Trump has not been charged with conducting and...
The Constitution implies in the impeachment clause that it is possible to criminally prosecute an ex-president for some action he took while...
Politicians always are involved, discuss, complain about and challenge election systems -- happens all the time. It is rare that an electoral...
Trump challenged the electoral college vote, something that is done all the time by both parties That is one of the very few examples that are...
People in power never order a coup, but it's a valid quesfion to the point so I'll play along. Your very question is the crux of the rub. That...
IMO the actions of Trump relative to the electoral college were done as president. But here is where the rub lies. If an ex-president doesn't...
I beg to differ. A few might be obvious but millions are fuzzy.
The prime stumbling block unanswerable question.
Likely the same thing every president since George Washington did.
WHAT???!!?
I can see some logic in that, but SCOTUS cannot appropriately thread that micro-holed needle hiding deep in the haystack. The question is...
Just the exact opposite is true.
Assassinating a political rival is in no way a presidential activity. But presidential activities encompass far more than national security concerns.
Got anything to purpose that would work?
The immunity case makes no distinction between presidential actions and criminal actions.
.... which is perfectly legal and not what the trial is about.
The Constitution says nothing about prosecuting an ex president except that it is allowed after impeachment.. The immunity case makes no...
I hate to pour some cold water reality on this interesting post, but the speed difference has to come from the coding and terminal equipment....
Maybe, but it sure seems we need to ban and take away the knives.
Why do you people keep calling it a "hush money" trial when it is a trial over suspected bookkeeping errors???
It is unthinkable that SCOTUS would not agree with Trump. Subjecting a former president for actions he took while president is a most abominable...
They have no shame, pride, or inhibitions and don't even try to camouflage it.
I liked your post, but not your singling out Reagan for a near mass hysteria that swept the entire country, NY State leading the pack as I recall.
If you researched just a bit longer you might get some facts straight. There is no such thing as a conspiracy to execute a perfectly legal non...
There is no such account within accounting standards. When your lawyer handles an expense for you he charges you for that, you pay your lawyer,...
Separate names with a comma.