Natural News is a fake news and conspiracy propaganda website. In fact, this particular article was written by Mike Adams himself. It's about as...
Ya know...it almost seems like some you take pride in getting conned by these fake news and conspiracy sites. In fact, the faker it is the more...
You do you realize that Natural News is a fake news site that sells conspiracy theory propaganda across a broad range of topics right? The founder...
So you think the various groups that have actually done it were too stupid to account for how big the ocean is? Seriously?
We have ocean temperature data going back to the 1800s via ERSST, HadSST, etc. And we have data going back much further than that using proxies....
Any model that you feel best represents reality. We have data about the climate going back more than a billion years. And model's don't...
You could start by showing us an alternate model that explain and predicts the climate over both the paleoclimate and instrumental record than...
It still uses C4 carbon fixation. And it is still subject to a wide variety growth modulating factors other than just CO2.
And more warming. BTW... just like CO2 isn't the only thing that modulates the climate it's also not the only that modulates plant growth. Many...
Zharkova. Well known. Her theories are overwhelmingly rejected by the rest of the scientific community. Just last year she was predicting hundreds...
Can you show where the IPCC has ever predicted that "the Earth will spontaneously ignite, civilization will disappear, and humanity will go...
You need to read the information in the link you provided carefully. And I do mean carefully.
I think I see the problem. You base your perception of climate science on what politicians say.
It may have been popular to you and the media, but it wasn't popular among scientists. It's actually the opposite. It's preposterous at best to...
Since scientists aren't predicting any of these occurring by 2050 I'd imagine excuses would be unnecessary. Climate science is based on the law...
Don't forget to add the last 170 years of warming in Greenland to the GISP2 data before making assertions regarding how the modern warm era...
The term climate change was first used back in the 1950's though variations of the phrase were used much earlier. Either way it was the Luntz Memo...
Scientists were reasonably certain even in the 70s that the planet would warm. https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/2008BAMS2370.1 Most...
Yes. In the 70s too. https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/2008BAMS2370.1
If by panic crowd you mean the media...then yes. But scientists were overwhelmingly predicting that the planet would warm.
And for those who want to maximize GDP growth and Earth's carrying capacity for humans.
I'm still waiting for an example of a doomsday prediction from the IPCC AR5 report.
No. I'm sorry I don't know. Can you be specific? What exactly is mentioned in the report that you feel is a doomsday prediction?
Maybe you can help me out because I'm not familiar with any legitimate doomsday predictions from AGW. Can you give me an example of a doomsday...
I guess by "seriously" I meant something worth talking about or mentioning in forum post. I hear all sorts of doomsday predictions too, but I...
Separate names with a comma.
