‘Conspiracy theorists’ sane, government dupes crazy and hostile

Was this report written by third graders? It is a goofy debunking report that virtually proves Chandler right and concludes that Chandler is wrong. It is dumb as can be. The debunkers of truth are getting desperate.

 

Goofy???...did you go over the math? Point out how their conclusion is flawed.

 

Yes, I did. Their math confirms David Chandler's claims. All they did was confirm David Chandler's findings and conclude that he was wrong. Classic truth debunker style.

 

Sure you did.

Yeah, you understood everything.

 

Oh yeah, they do a lot of double talking but in the end they prove Chandler right and conclude he was wrong. Double speak is the language of truth debunkers.

 

"Double-talking" = Didn't understand the article. Gotcha, thanks for playing.

 

I understand what they were attempting to do. They are exaggerating dynamic force to see if anyone will believe them. They claim that the laws of physics do not apply, and then they claim it is Chandler's law of motion they debunk not Newton's laws of motion. It is desperation. You can believe them if you like but all I see is childish nonsense.

 

HOW is what chandler's saying right?...you are very vague on anything you post,hallmark of the troofer

 

Troofer? The correct spelling is truther. I seek the truth. David Chandler tells the truth. Your misunderstanding of physics is your problem not mine. I understand what David Chandler writes and says because I understand physics.

 

troofer is the name for the people like you who know a lot of crap that just isn't so..so THAT is the correct spelling

And I'm not the one appealing to authority and proclaiming others wrong without saying WHY they're wrong,and I understand physics well enough to know you don't have a fracking clue,you just parrot everything yor troofer masters spew at you.

 

Just doing the dance. I admit that I appeal to the authority of Newton's laws of physics to explain why those buildings should not have fallen down near freefall speed on 9/11. Buildings simply do not just fall down without taking out their structural columns. You can go to your grave with your misunderstanding if you like. It makes no difference to me. I am going to keep telling the truth anyway.

 

you have yet to tell the truth about 9-11.

- - - Updated - - -

says the man who made the following idiotic & ignorant comment:

 

is that why YOU constantly insult and defame debunkers?

 

Sir Isaac Newton is the one who proved the basic laws of physics to demonstrate the top of the towers crashing down on the lower towers can not crush the lower towers. I agree with his laws of motion. Newton was not ignorant or idiotic.

 

NO,you appeal to things you don't have ANY hope of understanding,parroting the words of flim flam men and outright opportunists,all the while whining 'But I'm telling the truuuuuuuuuuuuth!'

Simply pathetic.

 

your sad misunderstanding of basic physics is why you FAIL.

[video=youtube;fLrpBLDWyCI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpag e&v=fLrpBLDWyCI[/video]

 

Show your math.

 

inertia's a bi***...no way the static load of the bottom part of the wtc towers,could stand up to the dynamic load of the top of the towers which became a progressively heavier as the collapse progressed

Newtons laws are based on force applied being equal...it wasn't

 

Okay. Whatever you say. Sheesh. High Rise Building Experts and Newton's laws of motion disagree. Your physics must be the new physics taught in government schools and as seen on TV.

 

sorry bro, but no WTC floor could handle the dynamic load of 30 floors crashing down upon it.

 

Hardly....it's the same old stuff discovered shortly after we stopped swinging in trees

 

No, you do not. According to you, verinage does not work.

 

And were he still alive he would slap you silly for the way you abuse them.

 

you screwed up again, double talking is mostly by people suffering from cognitive dissonance, laymen call it talking out of both sides of your ass at the same time. Professional liars con artists official story huggers troughers and politicians do it all the time.

 

holy (*)(*)(*)(*) so you think newton was a quack and in the same sentence say you understand physics?

Good luck selling that snake oil!


In the same issue of ABS, University of Buffalo professor Steven Hoffman adds that anti-conspiracy people are typically prey to strong “confirmation bias” – that is, they seek out information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs, while using irrational mechanisms (such as the “conspiracy theory” label) to avoid conflicting information.