not even remotely close. My mistake that you care about facts. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?view=map&year_high_desc=true
I wasn't using nominal GDP Einstein. Rank Country GDP (millions of Int$) World 126,687,917 1 China[n 1] 23,122,027 — European Union[n 2] 20,852,702 2 United States 19,362,129 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)
Yeah, much like there would be a "Constitutional Crisis" if Nunes released his memo. The closer we get to the truth the more hysterical the Leftists become.
Aren't the Democrats complaining, without evidence, that the Russians interfered with the election? Here's what Obama had to say.
PPP is a socio economic measure. GDP as expressed by economic output is a purely economic measure. Seems a basket of consumer goods in a nation of 1.2 BILLION and a per capita gdp of $6900 measures rather favorably with the richest nation in history with a per capita gdp of $59,600. . I suppose its all a matter of perspective. Half full or half empty kinda thing.
In 2024, maybe he will leave office, but the way you Leftists Kooks keep going on, id be in favor of allowing a 3rd term just for the fun of it.
No, PPP is an economic adjustment to GDP to reflect the differing purchasing power of a dollar in different countries. No one denies that we far exceed china on a GDP / capita basis.
Sorry but that is GDP adjusted for purchasing power parity. Here is the actual list by nominal GDP which is the normally accepted standard. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)
Let me explain. Facts are not necessarily related to what need evidence. An example. The sky is blue on sunny days. Fact. Trump colluded with Russians because the sky is blue. The fact isn't necessarily evidence. Hope that helps.
And so because Americans drank milk as children, Trump is not the most insane self referential President in American history. Got it, thanks.
attacking the press is not attacking democracy. You are allowed to attack the press here in the United States. Its covered under the 1st. Its not open to debate.
Actually while of course it is legal for the President to attack the press it is no different in fact from the President attacking the Constitution.
Nope. Obviously facts unrelated to the topic are not evidence, but that is a rather silly arguement. And the sky is not blue on a sunny day to a colorblind or a blind person so your example is not a fact. And to quibble further the perception of " blue" is subjective not factual.
yeah...it is. The press is not the founding document. They are an entity that exists under the freedom the constitution provides.