1 out of 10 Swedish women will be raped in their lifetime.

The latest statistics coming out reveal a woman in Sweden has a statistically 1 in 4 chance of being the victim of a sexual assault during her lifetime.

In 2003, the country's rape statistics were higher than average at 9.24, but in 2005 they shot up to 36.8 and by 2008 were up to 53.2. By 2014 they had gone all the way up to 69. The next year it declined by 12%, but by 2016 it was back up to 69.3



Rapes per 100,000 residents
country -------- 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
South Africa -------------------------------- 88.4- 91.6
Sweden --------24.9 -25.1 - 36.8- 40.6-46.6- 53.2
New Zealand ----------------27.4 - 32.2- 31.3- 30.9
USA -------------31.6- 31.7- 31.2- 30.3- 29.3- 28.6
Belgium --------27.6- 28.2- 28.7- 29.9- 29.5- 26.3
Zimbabwe -----30.8- 40.0- 38.4- 39.9- 38.3- 25.6

https://www.thelocal.se/20170112/swedens-2016-crime-stats-analyzed

quick calculations:
violent sexual assault rate of 69.3 divided by 100,000, then divided by 0.4999, times average female lifetime expectancy 82.5

It's so bad they're even going to institute women-only music festivals. This in a country of notorious gender equality where gender isn't supposed to make any difference at all.

www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/sweden-music-festival-men-female-only-bravalla-rape-sexual-assault-emma-knyckare-a7824366.html

 

Swedish women !

Come to New Hampshire, USA. It is cold most of the year like you are used to, and we have guns, lots of guns. I've got room at the compound, and political connections to help you get your green card.

 

Isn't Sweden the country where unprotected sex = rape?

 

Yes, but that's not the cause of these numbers. All that craziness was already in place by the mid-90s, but the numbers still continued to steeply increase.

This has been used by many as a deflect to try to divert attention away from what is happening. A wishful rationalization for why the rape rates seem to have gone off the charts.
"Look, there's not more rape than their used to be! Women are just reporting it more and the definition of rape has been expanded."

But like I already said, feminism took hold in Sweden several decades ago and women had already lost any last vestiges of sexual shame they might have had to report rape. These bizarre "rape" definitions had already been written into law and become an established part of the society well over a decade before the big change started being seen in the statistics.

How you tell the difference between real rape and microagression that's called "rape" is you look at the number of violent rapes, which is categorized separately in the statistics they keep, and this reveals that yes, the increase in rape numbers does indeed consist of real rapes.

 

....but don't bring your daughters to Alabama.

 

Alabama is a different place. We DO have educational opportunities 'round these parts. Ifn' ya don't like UNH, ( and having some experience with UNH, I might not blame ya),...there is a heap big "higher learnin'" just an hour drive south into Boston. And the night life can't be beat in Cambridge, MA.

No worries Swedish women, I've got it all lined up.

 

I do not really understand some people's fascination with Sweden, esp some Americans seem to be kind of caught up in this.
The different ways of categorising alone makes comparisons to other countries rather useless. What's rape by Swedish law isn't rape in other parts of the western world.
If yanks are so interested in sexual assault and rape, why don't they look at their own data?
321,500 victims of sexual assault and rape in the US a year, one every 98 seconds.
One out of six women US has been the victim of an attempted or completed rape in her life time.
127,000,000,000 - the total amount of money rape costs victims every year in the US.
17,7 million is the estimated number of rapes in the US since 1998. Never been good at maths but divided by 19 that's 931,578 a year, which is 2,552 a day.
At least 25% of all military women say they've been sexually assaulted.
90% of those military sexual assault victims who reported the crimes committed against them were involuntarily discharged; that's punishing the victim - wow. Only 8% of the reported cases resulted in prosecution.
http://humanevents.com/2011/11/22/speier-speaks-out-against-military-handling-of-sexual-assault/
https://www.rainn.org/statistics/victims-sexual-violence
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/sexual-assault-statistics_us_58e24c14e4b0c777f788d24f
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/781380_3
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Invisible_War
No reason to look at Sweden to tell oneself how bad it is, when all the bad things are at one's own doorsteps.

Edit: missing letter.

 

Your information is not contained in your link

 

Yes, but America has been like that for a long time. Historically in Sweden it was very low (as was most of the rest of Europe), but all of a sudden within 25 years it's now worse than the U.S.

Do the math.

and that table of figures comes from a UNODC report. (I didn't include the link for that one because I got it from a secondary source and the report it linked to is no longer on their site)

 

In other words flake news

But the Caligula is correct. The definitions of sexual assault vary from country to country

Here kissing someone against thier will can be classed as sexual asssault

Not forgetting the majority of assaults are by men known to the woman

 

Swedish women, you are safe here.

I want you to know that you are invited by my Irish community here. We know what you are dealing with. Now don't be nervous, it's not a 'Whitey Bulger', type of thing. However we understand that your county is dealing with foreign terrorists backed by the British Empire to destabilize your country with unchecked immigration.



We understand that Globalists based in LONDON...are responsible for the native marginalization in YOUR OWN COUNTRY!

You are safe here.

 

It's true Sweden has some crazy rape laws but these are just being used to obscure what is happening.

Furthermore in many of these cases the offenses are actually classified as "sexual coercion" and a different word is used for the traditional type of rape. The distinction just doesn't translate into English very well.
And don't think that just because it's classified as "rape" the courts treat it like rape. Even in the cases of a real rape, the typical prison sentences are extremely lenient by American standards. The perpetrator of a brutal rape might only get 6 years, or less.

 

Several MILLION of us are here on the east coast of the US. We have lawyers, guns and money. We will help you.

 

You fail to address the the problem.

 

The reason the rape statistics seem high is "mainly due to the strictness of Swedish laws and how rape is recorded in the country."

In Sweden rape cases are recorded differently than in other countries and the definition of rape is much broader, encompasing acts that would be 'assault or bodily harm in other countries.'

https://www.thelocal.se/20170221/why-sweden-is-not-the-rape-capital-of-the-world

 

No that's not really true. The country already had all these laws and was prosecuting them by the late 90's, but in 1996 the rate was less than 20 per 100,000.

There's a problem with the theory that the passage of more sexual assault legislation led to higher statistical rape rates, and that is that the timelines don't match up.

 

This is, apparently, an anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant thread. The following link will debunk the theory that the increase in rape in Sweden is due to Muslim immigrants.

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-39056786

 

oooh a link from the bbc ! Pure objective accuracy there, no political intentions whatsoever...nope.

 

Yes, BBC is known, and has been for decades, as highly objective and accurate. It is the most respected news organization in the world.

 

AND that might just be the problem.

 

It's a big problem that a news outlet focuses on the truth and being unbiased. Huge problem.

 

That prompts me to ask something: with a few exceptions, why are females flaky to the point of being naive, and seemingly totally incapable of predicting the unwanted consequences of their actions? I actually believe it's the principle difference between men and women.

 

So the whole problem with sexual assault and rape is down to 'females' being 'flaky' and 'naive' and incapable of behaving in a way that will not result in assault and rape? You have just given complete justfication to sharia laws regarding women covering, not going out w/o a male relative, and being held responsible when they are raped.