Look, we've been over this before......Paul is never going to win even one primary state save perhaps his home state of Texas....whoppdie-dee! The guy is a Ross Perot throw back to a time when people were amused by guys looking for their 15 minutes of fame. No main stream Republicans could or would vote for this side show character who waves the white flag in surrender to anything having to do with foreign military affairs.....so why still all the fuss for this loser? He doesn't have the money or what it takes to go after obama the way Mitt Romney does on a daily basis. Like I said before, Paul is looking toward retirement since another run for congress just isn't in the cards for him at his advanced age, and even he said he didn't stand a chance of becoming president.
If that was the case you wouldnt complain about people making threads about him. Is this your 3rd or 4th thread you started complaining? He said he doesnt think about the oval office when he goes to sleep. So he isnt an egocentric bastard. I guess in your mind that is a bad thing. Could you show how well Perot did in the first two Primaries? Why do you compare him to Paul the two situations couldnt be farther apart.
Congratulations! You just made it 12! Ron Paul is on a mission to reform the Republican Party, and he's doing a great job so far. You might as well get used to seeing these threads, 'cuz he's got the funding and organization to go the distance.
Maybe better-explained... [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUkSrE-vudE"]Matt Welch Explains Why the Tea Party and Libertarians Cant Support Mitt Romney on Fox's Cavuto - YouTube[/ame]
At least I ..your humble Romney guy keeps it real. If they aint For Paul ..they are against somebody else. There is only 1 above Paul ..and it aint Perry . How many JOBS HAS PAUL EVER CREATED..feel free to use his dreams..his made up theories and his newsletter staff numbers to support the Paul economic success stories. Use the paper boy..his gardener..or the flight he flew on to go home to rest. Use his Voting record if you can. On jobs..Paul is the least talented in creation and historical Facts bear that out.
Bush/Cheney Strategist: Ron Paul Can't Be Bought Off [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNOWTRa8aNQ&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL"]Bush/Cheney Strategist: Ron Paul Can't Be Bought Off - YouTube[/ame] Hes coming for u traitor lobbyist!
Is there even one of you loser paul supporters that think he can possibly win the Republican primaries--seeing how Paul himself said he can't see himself winning? So for a guy who can't possibly win, why do you paulbots keep singing the praises of this loser?
I find it odd that your name is Libhater but you support a candidate who's the most liberal instead of the true conservative in the primary... Whatever floats your boat. Even if he doesn't win the nomination (which I don't really expect him to), he is spreading a message that is wildly popular with young voters.
I couldn't disagree more. I look at Romney as being a venture capitalist businessman who creates start up businesses and rescues the olympics from certain failure. He's for lowering the corporate tax, producing our own energy, strong on illegal immigration/border control and a stalwart in taking on the foreign terrorists, i.e. Iran. Would those young voters with heads full of socialist mush be related to those young OWS types?
I will say this, I am a a moderate democrat. I think if nothing else, Ron Paul has had the biggest impact be it better or for worse on the party than any other GOP member. I do believe, and actually see a shift in mainstream GOP culture of not support our war efforts and our overall military industrial complex controlling everything. Besides that the federal reserve now gets audited. Paul is the genuine article, he has no special interest propping him up and he is the closest thing Republican or Democrat that you will ever get to an honest politician on a national scale. I think if anything, Ron will open the door for his son, which if made it would be the first Republican I would vote for as president. Quick story though, my grandfather was a Republican and in SC he ran for state senate 3 different times. He never really got a whole bunch of money raised or anything, put up a few signs, and never thought he would ever win but he wanted specific things done about helping out the black youth in school as they are they were the most neglected and he wanted something done about droughts and the rising crystal meth problem in the area. He promised things that before none of the other candidates would promise. They all had more money than him, and helped the community out in different ways than he did that were more profitable, so they had friends with deeper pockets. He was 100% sincere and many people loved my granddad but from a practical matter, they had suits and ties, my granddad always had a dirty white t-shirt and pants with chicken (*)(*)(*)(*) all over them so yeah... Anyways, because of these big things my granddad promised, the winning candidate promised it too and that is how my grandfather made his region better. He did that 2 more times before he passed away. I think if nothing, Ron Paul just wants the same be it you agree with him or not.
why do you lib haters keep voting for big government statists. You should change your name to lib lover, not smart enough to realize it.
Mitt Romney raised taxes as a governor, raised spending, supported TARP, and supported individual mandates. Sounds more like a liberal than a conservative to me... Not to mention his flip flops on the 2nd amendment, abortions and other issues. Please explain how Ron Paul promotes socialism, I am very curious. It is indisputable that young people support Ron Paul over the other candidates with nearly 50% of people under 30 voting for him in the past two primaries.
Yes I did, but Bush wasn't anything close to being a big spender until his 7th year as POTUS when he served his lame duck session under a newly formed Democrap congress--when he decided to become a big govt whore, so he wasn't a statist when I voted for him in 2000 and in 2004.
Paul is an over emotional, tempered, libertarian that thinks he is all that the constitution stands for. Who does he think he is judging other Presidents actions for military decisions? I understand we have lost young men and women (which is most of his complaint - 18 yr. olds, etc) but that is part of serving our nation. These kids know what they are recruiting for. If we had to entertain defending our nation, he wouldn't entertain the draft and we would be doomed. All he is doing is putting fear into the people's minds who are against war and attempting to weaken America just as Obama has done. Do we want another "Apology" tour by Ron? Hell no.
Let's get something staight here, the reason people keep talking about the loser Paul is because he is the only one really worth talking about. As for the movement he started, do note that the majority of his followers seem to be under 30. This means that all that is needed is for someone to take up the torch and carry on. Perhaps his son? Who knows, but the foundation has been layed for overthrowing these 2 party vermon. Mwha, mwhaha, mwhahahahahahahah!!
Anything "close" yet still was a massively big spender and increased the size of Government by quite a lot. He became a Big Government President after 2001 yet, you voted for him in 2004... let me guess for the lesser of two evils?