2 trials, 1 theme: White men taking law into their own hands

You shouldn't make all these liberal assertions then end you comment by asking ""Do they also make bullet proof pants, and helmets". You go through all that then prove you dont have a clue about your subject matter by asking that question. Thanks for the chuckle.

 

Do they also make bullet proof pants, and helmets? With that final entry you make it perfectly clear you have no idea what you are talking about.

 

Maybe you should check out the history of the gun control culture since you are commenting on the gun culture. The gun control culture has always been about disarming black people, i.e., a racist culture.

https://thelibertarianrepublic.com/the-racist-history-of-gun-control/

 

Constitutional Carry is no problem here at all. But, then again, folks say "Yes, Sir" and "No, Ma'am" here and we love our cops.

 

Many other people brought weapons who remained unmolested. What was different about Kyle? Rosenbaum seemed to focus on him for some reason.

 

I'm glad you got a chuckle out of it because-- to clue-in the clueless-- that line was meant to be a joke, which I'm sure is easily recognizable, to nearly all readers.

 

How so? One was an instance of self defense while the other was blatant lawlessness - hence the different outcomes.

Not even a question. There were no blacks involved in Rittenhouse case, BTW.

Nonsense. Blacks are killing far more blacks with guns - so apparently they are available to blacks.
[quute=Galileo]
"White vigilantism signifies 'the need to keep the Black population, particularly the Black male population, under surveillance and under control,' said writer Darryl Pinckney. It has evolved over time, but there is a long history in the U.S. of people taking the law into their own hands — and of white Americans using that as a pretext to violently enforce racial boundaries."
https://apnews.com/article/ahmaud-a...al-injustice-5a9b847506d388b7358b7de8b9079bb2[/quote] Ridiculous

You have a right to an opinion.

 

And it took you TWO posts, to say that? You really have no claim to be able to lecture anyone else on having an idea of what one is talking about. You didn't even recognize that my line was a joke...Nor, it seems, did you recognize the point of my including that line, if you reply with 2 posts, which together, do nothing more than claim that I should know the answer to my joke line-- so therefore should not have included it? But then I would've had to have made my last point, in a humorless, boring manner, akin to the way you make your points, like the one above.

 

I saw an comment that he helped fight a fire Rosenbaum started. The guy was a nut job so, there may not even be a logical reason.

 

I don't lecture anyone. I leave that radical leftists standing on soap boxes.