22 Israelis murdered 180 wounded during the last two months

thousands of Palestinians have been forced off their lands in the West Bank.

that is Forced Transfer, and it is a war crime under the 4th GC and 1907 Hague Regulations.

 

Eh... Not as bad as becoming a marthyr at 13 years of age.

WTF does one do with 72 virgins when he's 13? Do you know?

 

Yes really. Your puny little legal experts don't trump the judgement of the UN, the UNSC, the international court of justice etc etc.

 

not as bad? you'r replying to:
"They all would [be scared] with a knife in their neck".
Some random picture of happy Israeli's won't change a thing about that Israel remains to be a place of a militarized society, on a 24/7 look out for being attacked over their apartheid and ethnic cleansing ways.

 

I already replied to this claims. Please read: http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=433636&page=18&p=1065598168#post1065598168

 

I know you did. But your "experts" still do not get to trump the judgement of the UN, the UNSC, the international court of justice etc etc. Nobody and nothing can trump that. They make it so that it is a FACT that them settlements are illegal and that it's game set mach, bye bye, the end.

And it is so, because there is no argument why your "experts" get to trump/overeule the UN, the UNSC, the international court of justice etc etc. And you don't even give it 1 attempt why your cry babies get to trump/overrule the UN, the UNSC, the international court of justice etc etc.

 

Not according to the UN Charter that protect the rights that were granted to the Jews in 1922, like settling in the Land of Israel (you refer it as "Palestine").

Prof. Rostow helped draft Resolution 242. Are you saying that Resolution 242 was nonsense as well?

 

even the Israeli Supreme Court agrees that the West Bank is under Israeli Occupation, and governed by the 1907 Hague Regulations.

- - - Updated - - -

Article 80 says the rigths end when a Mandate is concluded.

The UN concluded the Mandate for Palestine in 1948.

its over, bro. Get used to it.

 

And Article 80 is contradicting it by protecting the rights that were granted to the Jews in 1922 over the Land of Israel.

The Mandate indeed concluded in 1948, while the document of the Mandate wasnt.

 

The document of the Mandate was concluded in 1948.

 

I already replied to it. Please read: http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=433636&page=17&p=1065597880#post1065597880

 

your reply is wrong.

The UN concluded the Mandate in 1948.

its over. The rights afforded by the Mandate to the Jews, expired in 1948.

Deal with and embrace the truth.

 

Please read comment #186.

 

with all due respect, you're wrong.

The UN concluded the Mandate in 1948.

its over. The rights afforded by the Mandate to the Jews, expired in 1948.

Deal with and embrace the truth.

 

It seems to,... well.. probably everybody, that you utterly refuse to accept exactly WHO has the last say in this.
And it still remains so that the UN, the UNSC, the international court of justice etc etc have ruled them settlements are illegal last time I checked.

And they remain illegal until they change their minds.

 

I'm amracing the truth. The Mandate indeed ended in 1948, but the document of the Mandate kept going.

- - - Updated - - -

But that way they are contradicting their own Charter that protects the rights that were given to the Jews over the Land of Israel, which one of them was to settle.

 

Article 80 only protects rights stated in a Mandate, until the Mandate is concluded.

The Mandate for Palestine ended in 1948, which I have told you 1,347 times but you continue to ignore/deny.

 

And sme random Palestinian marthyr wannabe does not scare Israel. The Jews used to defend themselves, so what's some brainwashed kids on the way to meet with the maker to a mighty Israel?

Not much.

 

The Mandate indeed ended in 1948, but the document of the Mandate kept going.

 

wrong.

 

You, and your cry babies are assuming this is contradicting. But apparently it aint so. This probably has to do that the same document from 1922 says "existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine" ... "safeguarding the civil and religious rights of all the inhabitants of Palestine, irrespective of race and religion". So no Jew immigrant got any right above the indigenous Arab.

And as we all know. The Jew immigrant trashed this and keeps on trashing this.
No doubt that document contains a lot more text about who and what and rights.

And all in all... the verdict has been made.
Settlements are illegal.

The end.

 

It is your opinion.

 

negative... it's the opinion of the UN, the UNSC, and the international court of justice vs you and your cry babies.
And that makes it so you're wrong.

 

its the official view of the Israeli Supreme Court, the UN Security Council, and the International Court of Justice.

 

When the document stated "safeguarding the civil and religious rights of all the inhabitants of Palestine, irrespective of race and religion", it ment that it is one responsiblity (out of many) of the Mandatory power to fulfill, and since the Mandate is in the hands if the UN, after the Brits gave the responsibility over the Mandate back to the UN, ,then it is the UN responsiblity to safeguard these rights.

Not according to Article 80 that protects the rights that were granted to the Jews, which one of them was to settle.

- - - Updated - - -

Which are all been contridacted by the UN Charter, Article 80.