4-Year-Old Boy Suspended from Daycare for Having Tiny .22 Shellcase

There is nothing about a behavior in reguards to this. The kid was 4 year old. This is a school jumping overboard way, overboard.

 

Right, and that isn't true at all.

 

Or bake cakes

 

And you've never heard of a four year old...

Being sent to their room without supper?
Told they could not watch TV?
Told they cannot have a friend over?

The child broke the rules.
The child was counseled.
The child continued to break the rules.
The child was punished.

And since you and yours continue to beat the gun dog...Do you really want to give a firearm to someone who has demonstrated, since the age of four, a complete inability to follow the rules when it comes to firearms?

 

For Gods sake a spent cartridge is hardly a firearm and just how has the four year old NOT follow the rules pertaining to a firearm, you do realize there was no firearm involved, right? But let logic play to this asinine theory shall we? Most firearm accident among children are from "LACK" of exposer and training, this four year old will most likely be far more safe handling a firearm then say someone like yourself that can't even distinguish the difference between a spent cartridge and a firearm

 

Fine.
Just do not be reading him books like "Johnny has two Daddies" when he gets to first grade.
Nor make any mention that we choose our gender.
IOW, quit creeping out the kids because of your aggressive social agenda.

 

I don't get it with Liberals, they refuse to address things, in this case firearms, and then wonder why accidents happen! It would stem to reason if we are to live in a gun culture, and we certainly do, then it would be prudent to at least prepare our young for something that they have a above average chance of being exposed to!

 

1. It's not about firearms. It is about following the rules and the consequences for not following the rules.
2. Let's take your "training" a step farther. What would the range management do with a person who refused to follow safety rules? Would they "suspend" him for access to the range or just say "boys will be boys?"
3. The firearm reference was in response to an earlier idea that proposed that this kid would have a great career in the military because he likes guns.

Ain't it sad when you do your and he ends up laughing at you?

 

I dunno, the range I go to site in at consist of four concrete bunkers with concrete resting tables and varied target holder out to 500 yards, and the same at the upper range with a max range of 1000 yard with cool Bell to signify you hit it! Generally there is no one there so it's just me, my wife and the dog. But here in my state they offer FREE nra safety classes three time a year by the local Sherriff dept, then again we like to teach rather than scare and punish children for things we didn't take time to teach

It doesn't appear to be related to any post other than what we see here, you clearly are equating a spent cartridge to a FIREARM when there was no firearm

 

The little boy can't understand that and he is the one being harmed by the school's attitude. He thinks the school hates him.

 

My child or not the school went way overboard.

 

Dado is so misinformed it's scary! The min age in this country for holding a child accountable is 11-13 years old, the lowest age of accountability world wide is SEVEN in only a few countries like Iran and even then seven for Girls and fifteen for Boys! So the school and folks like Dado are actually medieval by todays world social standard!

 

So glad you want to enforce the rules against 4-year-olds. Can I assume you hold that same position for those that ignore immigration laws?

 

dadoalex, master of the reductio ad absurdum.

 

The almighty rule is draconian and discriminatory.
Who else in that so called school is forbidden to discuss his favorite pastime and hobby? Is anyone beside this one little boy?

Get a new hobby....you suck as an internet debate king! The so called firearm rules you refer to aren't about firearms per se and in no way indicates this child will grow up unable to handle a weapon safely, but it's all about following the authoritarian dictates of this little slice of North Korea disguised as a preschool.

Your comment was absurd.

 

As long as we understand Dadoalex is also the master of you.

 

Well, that's just silly - and actually traumatic for child. Kid did nothing wrong or dangerous, acted absolutely normal, and got punished for nothing. That - is an act of unprofessionalism from the teacher or whoever else handled that incident, and sign that people should probably avoid that school.

My experience tells me, that people who bother so much with such minor things usually trying to pull attention away from some sort of corruption act, such as getting expired food products for the canteen, or things like that.

 

You are arguing against a school enforcing rules on a four year old. When it comes to absurd you've really light years ahead of me.

 

Not at all rules are equal or sensible or fair.

Some are arbitrary and discriminatory because some educrats got a stick up their butt when it comes to firearms.
Congratulations....your more recent comment was even more absurd than the one I highlighted before.

 

I have a 4..5 year daughter. So yea I know all about telling her "rules" As far as the firearm that is a real stretch. That is like saying he is 2 years old, he never listens.

 

The abusing is a school suspending a 4 year old over what is really nothing.

 

Excuse me. is that supposed to make sense or be funny? It doesn't and it's not.

Get on your knees each night and thank God that Trump is your president.

 

Could be he could tell the difference between a shotgun shell and a twenty two shell. The school kept calling it a shotgun shell and they were wrong. He might have been taking a cue, they didn't know what they were talking about.

 

A. the kid had an obsession with guns
B. He subsequently showed up at school with an expended shell casing
C. Whether it was a shot gun shell or a .22 matters not at all. Reagan was shot with a .22 and it nearly killed him. A .22 put Brady in a wheelchair with brain damage for the rest of his life.
D. Calling a .22 shell "tiny" is dishonest at best. It's size is not the issue. It's lethality is. Would it have been "better" if it had been a .45 shell? Of course not