5 girls accuse boy of sexual assault. Later admitted it never happen.

If they walk free, how do you know they're rapists?

 

.

They won't say, but my guess is any woman who has the audacity to blame a male Republican.

 

Yes. Because most of them never make any kind of serious news coverage.

 

And for every one of them that walks free, you want to put a raped woman in prison.

 

I want to put no rape victims in prison.

When a person makes a false accisation then the other person is a victim.

 

False .

Their names are smeared for life.

 

I was literally talking about due process, including highlighting the elements where the school and police appear to have failed to adhere to it in this case. Exactly which parts of my assessment do you disagree with?

You didn’t answer my question about your “accept claims of sexual assault” comment. What are you suggesting should actually happen if someone (male or female) makes and accusation of sexual assault, especially if they have witnesses who say they can collaborate the accusation?

 

As long as it doesn't make it to the news reports, it doesn't matter what happens to them within their communities?

If someone gets murdered, it doesn't affect them unless it nakes the news!

 

He's a Russian troll.

I'm not kidding

 

And if someone is accused and goes to trial and then is found innocent,clearly that accusation is false and then you want to have the rape victim put in prison.

 

Really? There are millions of people tried for rape and sexual assault each year. Barely anyone knows any of their names unless they were directly related to the case.

 

That's crazy talk.

 

That’s exactly what this thread is about. A woman goes to the police because she’s been raped/assaulted, the police arrest a man and put him on trial, he’s found innocent. The “logic” espoused by the OP says she must have been falsely accusing him so now she should go to prison.

 

No.

You added in the "must have been" part.

A person would still have to be proven guilty of having made a false accusation, not merely be unable to prove the allegation is true.

 

I have never said any such thing.

But such cases do mean that a man's name should be cleared .

It usually is not

 

No that is not what it is about

 

They do in fact.such

No there are not millions tried each year.

There are actually less than 100,000 tried each year and they are heavily publicized locally

 

They do in fact.such

No there are not millions tried each year.

There are actually less than 100,000 tried each year and they are heavily publicized locally

 

Buddy if you think this is new I have a bridge to sell you.

 

The logic would dictate that if the allegation wasn’t true, it must therefore be false.

 

The alt right?

Max, you are the one suggesting honor killings with the Repubs. This little insane road you are building is your problem spilling onto public forums.

I used to hold your opinion as ligit, enjoyed your input. What the **** is going on inside that punkin? Your thanks trump thread is just as weird. Every POTUS claims good and every POTUS distance themselves from failure and you know this.

Good luck.

 

And both sides should be given equal weight till one or the other proves their case.

 

Wrong.

There are many people tried for many crimes who are acquitted.

No one is saying that an acquittal automatically means false accusations.

I know you want to put those words in people's mouth but that is all you are doing.

 

Wait, so you mean you can have a true accusation even if the person is “found innocent”? Then how can you tell a false accusation from a true one?

Seriously, this is trying to punish victims for a stastical anomaly. Men have a higher chance of being raped themselves than being false accused of rape.

 

If it can be proven it was a false allegation the accuser should do the time the accused would have done