85 - 15

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by bricklayer, Dec 10, 2019.

  1. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    it can not
     
  2. william kurps

    william kurps Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2019
    Messages:
    5,041
    Likes Received:
    1,872
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Refuted what some people don't know Supreme court rulings can be overturned?

    Sorry its 6th grade civics 101
     
  3. william kurps

    william kurps Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2019
    Messages:
    5,041
    Likes Received:
    1,872
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Yes it can, sorry


    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_overruled_United_States_Supreme_Court_decisions


    List of overruled United States Supreme Court decisions


    This is a list of decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States that have been explicitly overruled, in part or in whole, by a subsequent decision of the Court. It does not include decisions that have been abrogated by subsequent constitutional amendment or by subsequent amending statutes.

    This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it.

    ConstitutionalEdit

    Article OneEdit
    Commerce Clause
    Overruled decision Overruling decision
    Hammer v. Dagenhart, 247 U.S. 251 (1918) United States v. Darby Lumber Co., 312 U.S. 100 (1941)
    Puget Sound Stevedoring Co. v. State Tax Commission, 302 U.S. 90 (1937) Department of Revenue v. Washington Stevedoring Cos., 435 U.S. 734 (1978)
    Joseph v. Carter & Weekes Stevedoring Co., 330 U.S. 422 (1947) Department of Revenue v. Washington Stevedoring Cos., 435 U.S. 734 (1978)
    Spector Motor Service v. O’Connor, 340 U.S. 602 (1951) Complete Auto Transit v. Brady, 430 U.S. 274 (1977)
    Joseph E. Seagram & Sons v. Hostetter, 384 U.S. 35 (1966) Healy v. Beer Institute, 491 U.S. 324 (1989)
    National League of Cities v. Usery, 426 U.S. 833 (1976) Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority, 469 U.S. 528 (1985)
    Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992) South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., 585 U.S. ___ (2018)
    Ex post facto
    Overruled decision Overruling decision
    Kring v. Missouri, 107 U.S. 221 (1883) Collins v. Youngblood, 497 U.S. 37 (1990)
    Thompson v. Utah, 170 U.S. 343 (1898) Collins v. Youngblood, 497 U.S. 37 (1990)
    Federal tax
    Overruled decision Overruling decision
    Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., 157 U.S. 429 (1895) (in part) South Carolina v. Baker, 485 U.S. 505 (1988)
    State import/export tax
    Overruled decision Overruling decision
    Low v. Austin, 80 U.S. (13 Wall.) 29 (1872) Michelin Tire Corp. v. Wages, 423 U.S. 276 (1976)
    Hooven & Allison Co. v. Evatt, 324 U.S. 652 (1945) Limbach v. Hooven & Allison Co., 466 U.S. 353 (1984)
    Article One courts
    Overruled decision Overruling decision
    Ex parte Bakelite Corp., 279 U.S. 438 (1929) Glidden Co. v. Zdanok, 370 U.S. 530 (1962)
    Williams v. United States, 289 U.S. 553 (1933) Glidden Co. v. Zdanok, 370 U.S. 530 (1962)
    O'Callahan v. Parker, 395 U.S. 258 (1969) Solorio v. United States, 483 U.S. 435 (1987)
    Article ThreeEdit
    Overruled decision Overruling decision
    Swift v. Tyson, 41 U.S. (16 Pet.) 1 (1842) Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938)
    Durham v. United States, 401 U.S. 481 (1971) Dove v. United States, 423 U.S. 325 (1976) (per curiam)
    Compensation Clause
    Overruled decision Overruling decision
    Evans v. Gore, 253 U.S. 245 (1920) United States v. Hatter, 532 U.S. 557 (2001)
    Miles v. Graham, 268 U.S. 501 (1925) O'Malley v. Woodrough, 307 U.S. 277 (1939)
     
  4. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    already refuted this
     
  5. william kurps

    william kurps Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2019
    Messages:
    5,041
    Likes Received:
    1,872
    Trophy Points:
    113

    No you gave opinions I cite facts.

    Sorry

    Cite it ..


    I prove you wrong once again its basic 6th grade civics 101



    List of overruled United States Supreme Court decisions


    Article OneEdit
    Commerce Clause
    Overruled decision Overruling decision
    Hammer v. Dagenhart, 247 U.S. 251 (1918) United States v. Darby Lumber Co., 312 U.S. 100 (1941)
    Puget Sound Stevedoring Co. v. State Tax Commission, 302 U.S. 90 (1937) Department of Revenue v. Washington Stevedoring Cos., 435 U.S. 734 (1978)
    Joseph v. Carter & Weekes Stevedoring Co., 330 U.S. 422 (1947) Department of Revenue v. Washington Stevedoring Cos., 435 U.S. 734 (1978)
    Spector Motor Service v. O’Connor, 340 U.S. 602 (1951) Complete Auto Transit v. Brady, 430 U.S. 274 (1977)
    Joseph E. Seagram & Sons v. Hostetter, 384 U.S. 35 (1966) Healy v. Beer Institute, 491 U.S. 324 (1989)
    National League of Cities v. Usery, 426 U.S. 833 (1976) Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority, 469 U.S. 528 (1985)
    Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992) South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., 585 U.S. ___ (2018)
    Ex post facto
    Overruled decision Overruling decision
    Kring v. Missouri, 107 U.S. 221 (1883) Collins v. Youngblood, 497 U.S. 37 (1990)
    Thompson v. Utah, 170 U.S. 343 (1898) Collins v. Youngblood, 497 U.S. 37 (1990)
    Federal tax
    Overruled decision Overruling decision
    Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., 157 U.S. 429 (1895) (in part) South Carolina v. Baker, 485 U.S. 505 (1988)
    State import/export tax
    Overruled decision Overruling decision
    Low v. Austin, 80 U.S. (13 Wall.) 29 (1872) Michelin Tire Corp. v. Wages, 423 U.S. 276 (1976)
    Hooven & Allison Co. v. Evatt, 324 U.S. 652 (1945) Limbach v. Hooven & Allison Co., 466 U.S. 353 (1984)
    Article One courts
    Overruled decision Overruling decision
    Ex parte Bakelite Corp., 279 U.S. 438 (1929) Glidden Co. v. Zdanok, 370 U.S. 530 (1962)
    Williams v. United States, 289 U.S. 553 (1933) Glidden Co. v. Zdanok, 370 U.S. 530 (1962)
    O'Callahan v. Parker, 395 U.S. 258 (1969) Solorio v. United States, 483 U.S
     
  6. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    already refuted this
     
  7. william kurps

    william kurps Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2019
    Messages:
    5,041
    Likes Received:
    1,872
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Supreme court's decision can and has been overturned, sorry
     
  8. william kurps

    william kurps Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2019
    Messages:
    5,041
    Likes Received:
    1,872
    Trophy Points:
    113

    How did one do it?




    That's why the left was deadly afraid of Clarence Thomas and kavanaugh any 6th grader knows Supreme court rulings from yesterday can be thrown out.

    It's not absolute law
     
  9. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    pointed out those cases were not on the same merits as the previous case. Nobody h as standing to challenge a specific ruling on the same merits. All lower courts are bound by the scotus precedent.




    anyone who thought kavanaugh could overturn Roe is just as wrong as you are.
     
    Last edited: Dec 12, 2019
  10. william kurps

    william kurps Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2019
    Messages:
    5,041
    Likes Received:
    1,872
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Oh really?

    I am right, sorry


    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...s-motivated-by-roe-v-wade-all-along?_amp=true





    The shameful campaign against Kavanaugh was motivated by Roe v. Wade all along
    by Kimberly Ross
    | September 06, 2019 12:00 PM

    Last year, the drama surrounding President Trump's second Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh, dominated the month of September. Democrats, already frustrated by the successful confirmation of Justice Neil Gorsuch, were determined to derail Kavanaugh's nomination — at all costs.

    Once the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings commenced, following various attempts to delay, Democrats treated Kavanaugh with utter disdain. Though the process was arduous, the nominee held his own and was on his way to confirmation. But then, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford's letter to California Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein, wherein she alleged that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in high school, was made public.
     
  11. william kurps

    william kurps Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2019
    Messages:
    5,041
    Likes Received:
    1,872
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh really sure a lot of Supreme court's rulings in the past over turned



    List of overruled United States Supreme Court decisions


    This is a list of decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States that have been explicitly overruled, in part or in whole, by a subsequent decision of the Court. It does not include decisions that have been abrogated by subsequent constitutional amendment or by subsequent amending statutes.

    This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it.

    ConstitutionalEdit

    Article OneEdit
    Commerce Clause
    Overruled decision Overruling decision
    Hammer v. Dagenhart, 247 U.S. 251 (1918) United States v. Darby Lumber Co., 312 U.S. 100 (1941)
    Puget Sound Stevedoring Co. v. State Tax Commission, 302 U.S. 90 (1937) Department of Revenue v. Washington Stevedoring Cos., 435 U.S. 734 (1978)
    Joseph v. Carter & Weekes Stevedoring Co., 330 U.S. 422 (1947) Department of Revenue v. Washington Stevedoring Cos., 435 U.S. 734 (1978)
    Spector Motor Service v. O’Connor, 340 U.S. 602 (1951) Complete Auto Transit v. Brady, 430 U.S. 274 (1977)
    Joseph E. Seagram & Sons v. Hostetter, 384 U.S. 35 (1966) Healy v. Beer Institute, 491 U.S. 324 (1989)
    National League of Cities v. Usery, 426 U.S. 833 (1976) Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority, 469 U.S. 528 (1985)
    Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992) South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., 585 U.S. ___ (2018)
    Ex post facto
    Overruled decision Overruling decision
    Kring v. Missouri, 107 U.S. 221 (1883) Collins v. Youngblood, 497 U.S. 37 (1990)
    Thompson v. Utah, 170 U.S. 343 (1898) Collins v. Youngblood, 497 U.S. 37 (1990)
    Federal tax
    Overruled decision Overruling decision
    Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., 157 U.S. 429 (1895) (in part) South Carolina v. Baker, 485 U.S. 505 (1988)
    State import/export tax
    Overruled decision Overruling decision
    Low v. Austin, 80 U.S. (13 Wall.) 29 (1872) Michelin Tire Corp. v. Wages, 423 U.S. 276 (1976)
    Hooven & Allison Co. v. Evatt, 324 U.S. 652 (1945) Limbach v. Hooven & Allison Co., 466 U.S. 353 (1984)
    Article One courts
    Overruled decision Overruling decision
    Ex parte Bakelite Corp., 279 U.S. 438 (1929) Glidden Co. v. Zdanok, 370 U.S. 530 (1962)
    Williams v. United States, 289 U.S. 553 (1933) Glidden Co. v. Zdanok, 370 U.S. 530 (1962)
    O'Callahan v. Parker, 395 U.S. 258 (1969) Solorio v. United States, 483 U.S. 435 (1987)
    Article ThreeEdit
    Overruled decision Overruling decision
    Swift v. Tyson, 41 U.S. (16 Pet.) 1 (1842) Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938)
    Durham v. United States, 401 U.S. 481 (1971) Dove v. United States, 423 U.S. 325 (1976) (per curiam)
    Compensation Clause
    Overruled decision Overruling decision
    Evans v. Gore, 253 U.S. 245 (1920) United States v. Hatter, 532 U.S. 557 (2001)
    Miles v. Graham, 268 U.S. 501 (1925) O'Malley v. Woodrough, 307 U.S. 277 (1939)
    Article FourEdit
    Extradition Clause
    Overruled decision Overruling decision
    Kentucky v. Dennison, 65 U.S. (24 How.) 66 (1861) Puerto Rico v. Branstad, 483 U.S. 219 (1987)
    Equal footing doctrine
    Overruled decision Overruling decision
    Bonelli Cattle Co. v. Arizona, 414 U.S. 313 (1973) Oregon ex rel. State Land Board v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co., 429 U.S. 363 (1977)
    Article SixEdit
    Supremacy Clause
    Overruled decision Overruling decision
    Reitz v. Mealey, 314 U.S. 33 (1941) Perez v. Campbell, 402 U.S. 637 (1971)
    Kesler v. Department of Public Safety, 369 U.S. 153 (1962) Perez v. Campbell, 402 U.S. 637 (1971)
    First AmendmentEdit
    Establishment Clause
    Overruled decision Overruling decision
    Meek v. Pittinger, 421 U.S. 349 (1975) Mitchell v. Helms, 530 U.S. 793 (2000)
    Wolman v. Walter, 433 U.S. 229 (1977) Mitchell v. Helms, 530 U.S. 793 (2000)
    School District of City of Grand Rapids v. Ball, 473 U.S. 373 (1985) Agostini v. Felton, 521 U.S. 203 (1997)
    Aguilar v. Felton, 473 U.S. 402 (1985) Agostini v. Felton, 521 U.S. 203 (1997)
    Free speech clause
    Overruled decision Overruling decision
    Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927) Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969)
    Minersville School District v. Gobitis, 310 U.S. 586 (1940) West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943)
    Valentine v. Chrestensen, 316 U.S. 52 (1942) Virginia State Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, 425 U.S. 748 (1976)
    Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957) Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973)
    Amalgamated Food Employees Union Local 590 v. Logan Valley Plaza, 391 U.S. 308 (1968) Hudgens v. National Labor Relations Board, 424 U.S. 507 (1976)
    Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, 494 U.S. 652 (1990) Citizens United v. FEC, 558 U.S. 310 (2010)
    McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, 540 U.S. 93 (2003) (in part) Citizens United v. FEC, 558 U.S. 310 (2010)
    Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, 431 U.S. 209 (1977) Janus v. AFSCME, 585 U.S. (2018)
    Fourth AmendmentEdit
    Overruled decision Overruling decision
    Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928) Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967)
    Harris v. United States, 331 U.S. 145 (1947) Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969)
    Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949) Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)
    Lustig v. United States, 338 U.S. 74 (1949) Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206 (1960)
    United States v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56 (1950) Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969)

     
  12. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I already acknowledged they are just as wrong as you are
     
  13. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    already refuted this
     
  14. william kurps

    william kurps Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2019
    Messages:
    5,041
    Likes Received:
    1,872
    Trophy Points:
    113

    I am right, you are wrong.

    Any Supreme court ruling from yesterday can be thrown out today civics 101
     
  15. william kurps

    william kurps Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2019
    Messages:
    5,041
    Likes Received:
    1,872
    Trophy Points:
    113

    How did you refute it?
     
  16. william kurps

    william kurps Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2019
    Messages:
    5,041
    Likes Received:
    1,872
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Tell us how a Supreme court ruling can be absolute perment law of the land?
     
  17. Sleep Monster

    Sleep Monster Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2019
    Messages:
    13,823
    Likes Received:
    9,351
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL!

    Seriously, most humans are social creatures, and living in cities comes with that. So do most jobs. The rural areas can't sustain a means of making a living for more than 15% of Americans.
     
  18. william kurps

    william kurps Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2019
    Messages:
    5,041
    Likes Received:
    1,872
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Where are the jobs in Detroit?
     
  19. gabmux

    gabmux Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 17, 2013
    Messages:
    3,721
    Likes Received:
    1,045
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Perhaps I can rephrase question.
    Here is your statement.......
    In reference to the part that's underlined, you seem to think it's important for "for the young ones".
    I'm asking how you came to that conclusion and by what criteria do you validate it's importance?
    Is it simply your own idea and opinion?
    And if so...what makes it so "important"?
     
  20. Sleep Monster

    Sleep Monster Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2019
    Messages:
    13,823
    Likes Received:
    9,351
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Where's the dead cow? There should be a dead cow in that picture ...
     
    Natty Bumpo likes this.
  21. Sleep Monster

    Sleep Monster Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2019
    Messages:
    13,823
    Likes Received:
    9,351
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I lived in NYC for ten years. There are always shops in the process of changing hands. Your photo would have some meaning if it showed several empty shops on the same block, but instead is shows what looks like an active, thriving business next door.

    Small retail businesses always come and go. This has nothing to do with politics.
     
    Last edited: Dec 12, 2019
  22. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    the supreme court is the final arbiter for any case brought under the constitution. Their ruling is absolute binding precedent for all lower courts. Nobody has standing to challenge a scotus ruling. The only way to overturn it, is with an amendment.
     
  23. Sleep Monster

    Sleep Monster Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2019
    Messages:
    13,823
    Likes Received:
    9,351
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You've just proven my point. Nearly 3 million California voters were disenfranchised in the 2016 election.
     
  24. william kurps

    william kurps Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2019
    Messages:
    5,041
    Likes Received:
    1,872
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Once again your wrong , sorry


    I have proved it multiple times, Supreme court of yesterday can be thrown out by today's Supreme court today that's why Democrats tried to smear Clarence Thomas and Kavanaugh they can overturn Roe vs Wade.
     
    Last edited: Dec 12, 2019
  25. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    well, I've shown you are completely wrong. While you are pounding your fists on your keyboard in frustration, texas remains a state because states can't secede.
     

Share This Page