Discussion in '9/11' started by Hunter Rose, Aug 22, 2011.
The towers were most certainly not empty. The family members of the victims are not actors.
You mean the one about no planes?..or the one about our government being behind it?...or maybe how explosives were used?......or more fantastically, how unexplained 'energy beams' were used?
Those disgustng BS stories?
Far, Far away.
No...actually I was thinking about large planes being buried underground, roughly a half mile away from their engine, and, how Hanji the magic box cutter pilot <cough> performed acrobatics over Washington, and how FBI employees confiscate film of a missile, I mean a plane, crashing into the Pentagon during the first 15 minutes of the "crash" versus helping dead and injured people. That kind of stuff.
Ahh, you mean truther 'made up' stuff...
Concerning the crackpot Simon Shack.
No...I mean evidence (or the lack of it) that you either avoid or can't comprehend.
Ahhhhh my mistake.....'made up' truther 'evidence'.
Sorry for the confusion
Truther evidence is much more realistic than "official" evidence, hands down, any day of the week.
Ahhh 'truther' evidence like secret energy weapons?.........super secret teams of workers rigging up the buildings,in secret ,for destruction?
denial of the existence of the planes when the world witnessed it happening?
That 'realistic' evidence?
I'd laugh,if it weren't so (*)(*)(*)(*) sad
If you have come to terms with the fact that 9/11 was a massive money-making scheme and - of course - a pretext to wage hugely profitable wars, the basic rationale behind this Grand Deception should, hopefully, become clearer. It is essential to consider all the variables which such an audacious false-flag operation would entail and what precautions its plotters must have observed: The Grand Deception plan was undoubtedly meant to be foolproof and, ideally, free of unnecessary elements of risk and opposition.
There was simply no rationale for the 9/11 plotters to commit a mass murder of some 3,000, mostly white-collar professionals (brokers, bankers, financial analysts, etc.) whose families would likely have access to first-rate, uptown legal assistance. Surely, killing that many people would have been an utterly senseless, self-inflicted aggravation on the part of the perpetrators.
No unauthorized, private imagery was captured on September 11, 2001. Most - if not all - of the imagery we have of that mornings events is prefabricated and/or manipulated.
You can claim it was manipulated all you want Hunter, but until you PROVE it, instead of making it up,it's just more B.S.
And Honest to God,you're looking for 'RATIONALE' from terrorists?.....might as well try to reason with a rabid dog.
You were never presented any truth "officially", yet you cling to your illusions. Why a double standard?
I'm still awaiting the testimony of one person who saw the "planes" crash live.
All I hear is crickets.
I see no double standard present..
You guys have a report that is chock full or errors, omissions, and flat out lie that took 4 or 5 years to put together. "Officially"....that's about it.
Coming from you?......I doubt it.
You doubt what?
your 'opinion' of the 9/11 report
I don't doubt that.
I have a witness...a friend who was there. Now what?
The people who I knew beforehand whom were not alive after prove your theory wrong. Anything else?
It's like this... You believe in, and triumphantly proclaim as fact, a narrative about the plotting of the attack which is unproven.. The 9/11 commission report fails to show evidence for such narrative other than heresay, there is no physical evidence tying these alleged perpetrators to the crime, and said alleged perpetrarors remain extrajudicially detained for almost a decade so far having NOT been proven guilty in court.
Nevertheless, you cling to this story as true despite the lack of evidence.. This is little different than someone clinging to stories of lazer beams and lizard people and such, without having any evidence.
Separate names with a comma.