9/11: Controlled demolition proven !

Discussion in '9/11' started by David Cena, Mar 19, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    thats right because for the towers they dropped a volkswagon on to a bus and the volkswagon won!
     
  2. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That is a childish comparison.the loose debris from the collapse of the tops of the tower was adequate to break the next floor. There was a space between floors so that the falling mass couldl again accelerate and add more than enough to break the next floor an on it goes, without any manner of arresting mechanism

    Idiot boy's model of the bug omits that fact as well as the fact that the first imppact would be more like a bus hitting a bug and gaining speed as it slams the bug into the next one.
     
  3. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    well even that does not seem to get the point across, it seems no one can simplify physics enough for troughers to get it., what can I say,it just goes to prove they really are not the experts they claim.
     
  4. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The behavior of two objects on the ground, in an inelastic collision, has nothing to do with an upright structure which in no way resembles a line of parked car.
     
  5. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113

    crush down for a car

    [​IMG]

    another file 13 plonk

    LMAO
     
  6. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Was that supposed to prove something relevant to 9/11? It doesn't. Everyone knows a tree will usually win in a fight with a car.
     
  7. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    it demonstrates you are all wrong and the wtc was really built out of glass since a 4 story drop barely dents the car
     
  8. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So freaking WHAT? What has that to do with the ability of one over loaded and broken floor to fall on and break the one below it?
     
  9. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113

    but that was not the demolition sequence, one floor did not fall and break another.
     
  10. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That was what did most of the damage once collapse was initiated. When the core columns failed under the weight that the perimeter columns were no longer supporting, they dumped massive debris onto the floors below and the rest of the building just unzipped intself.
     
  11. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But there were no damaged columns in wtc2
     
  12. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You are totally, laughably wrong about that, but this is the wrong threat to go on about that. We startd out discussing the wreckage at the Pentagon and what sort of damage was done to the building.

    You need to learn to address the issues at hand a little better.

    Have you come up with reasonable proof that something other than a 757 left that kind of marks and debris?
     
  13. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not my job, not my burden. You want to sing the official mantra the burden is yours since it is their responsibility to investigate properly if they did not and you have no proof their story is true to (*)(*)(*)(*)ing bad. It does not shift the burden onto me.

    the OP has several real firemens testimonies that heard, seen, felt, or were otherwise injured by explosions.
     
  14. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Okay, I got the threads mixed up, but that still does not make you right. The car drop is still as silly as little Dickie Gage's demonstration with empty cardboard boxes.

    And none of the fire fighter's statements are consistant with observing high explosive detonations.
     
  15. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    verniage it should have crushed down according to trougher theory of revised physics
     
  16. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Where on earth do you get that idea?
     
  17. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    you of course LMAO
     
  18. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Are you saying that the boxes should have been crushed if what I have said about verinage were true? That is patently absurd. There is no similarity between cardboard boxes and a building.
     
  19. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    sure there is they both have structural strength
     
  20. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Diamonds are graphite, then.
     
  21. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I don't vest too much energy in the discussions of the building collapses. There are oddities to me and questions that I have, but it is a discussion and topic that inevitably leads to verbatim what governmental agencies and academics have to say about the incidents.

    Instead, I prefer to look at the foreign policy, geopolitical, political, realpolitikal, legislative, military and clandestine moves we made as a country before and after September 11th, 2001.

    Like right now, I'm reading a book called Preventive Defense. It's by former Secretary of Defense William Perry (19th, 1994-97) and the current Deputy Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter. Their chapter on 'catastrophic terrorism' is most enlightening, considering this book was published in 1999.

    Here's what former Senator Sam Nunn said about the book:

    Here's one of the kickers. Catastrophic terrorism became a talking point because of an article three men wrote, namely, Ashton Carter, John M. Deutch and Philip D. Zelikow.

    http://belfercenter.hks.harvard.edu/publication/652/catastrophic_terrorism.html
    http://belfercenter.hks.harvard.edu/files/catastrophicterrorism-foreignaffairs-1198.pdf

    Catastrophic terrorism used elsewhere:

    http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=-vwgAAAAIBAJ&sjid=oHQFAAAAIBAJ&pg=1277,1077700&dq=catastrophic+terrorism&hl=en
    http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/catastrophic-terrorism-clinton-is-missing-point
    http://www.nytimes.com/1998/08/22/opinion/when-to-strike-back.html
    http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/international-developments-call-us-national-security-policy-question
    http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/year-2000-warning-uncle-sam-duck-cover
    http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/65948509.html?dids=65948509:65948509&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Jan+01%2C+2001&author=&pub=The+Washington+Post&desc=An+Agenda+for+Mr.+Rumsfeld&pqatl=google
    http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/25/opinion/how-to-protect-the-homeland.html
     
  22. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Then why post this in a thread about demolition? Why not start your own thread about the topic?
     
  23. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    troughers do not comprehend anything beyond what they can touch, and frankly they dont grasp most of that either..

    - - - Updated - - -

    ok so you do not deny they both have structural strength lol
     
  24. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Once again, you label yourself.
     
  25. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113

    yeh they both have structural strength too
     

Share This Page