Steve Riskus: "I saw the plane hit the building. It did not hit the ground first... It did not hit the roof first... It hit dead center on the edge... I was close enough (about 100 feet or so) that I could see the "American Airlines" logo on the tail as it headed towards the building... It was not completely level, but it was not going straight down, kind of like it was landing with no gear down... It knocked over a few light poles on its way... I did not see any smoke or debris coming from the plane. I clearly saw the "AA" logo with the eagle in the middle... I don't really remember the engine configuration, but it did have those turbine engines on the wing... and yes, it did impact the Pentagon... There was none of this hitting-the-ground first crap I keep hearing... It was definitely an American Airlines jet... There is no doubt about that." Donald R. Bouchoux, 53, a retired Naval officer, a Great Falls resident, a Vietnam veteran and former commanding officer of a Navy fighter squadron, was driving west from Tysons Corner to the Pentagon for a 10am meeting. He wrote: "At 9:40 a.m. I was driving down Washington Boulevard (Route 27) along the side of the Pentagon when the aircraft crossed about 200 yards in front of me and impacted the side of the building. There was an enormous fireball, followed about two seconds later by debris raining down. The car moved about a foot to the right when the shock wave hit. I had what must have been an emergency oxygen bottle from the airplane go flying down across the front of my Explorer and then a second piece of jagged metal come down on the right side of the car. Washington Post, September 20, 2001
the shills logic they have cracks me up to no end.they always run off from videos like this always refusing to address them as evidenced by this thread.Not only that but they have the pricless hysterical logic that congress is looking out for us,that they all have our best interests at heart,that all these government instituitons and congress are all looking out for us and the media is there to serve us and do truthful reporting all the time and they are all right and all these architects,engineers,physists,ex generals in the military,whistle blowers that came forward and lost thier jobs as a consequence,that THEY are all lying and telling the truth. comedy gold from the shills. whats really hysterical though is they are so much desperate for attention they fell the need to talk to themselves addressimg my posts as though they actually think I read it.they obviously have horrible memory and reading comprehension problems since i have said over a million times that ulike you,I have them on ignore.they aure are desperate for attention that they have to talk to themselves all the time like they do here.thats a sign of someone ready for the nuthouse.they live in denial about that though. see unlike you,I do the wise thing and dont give them the attention they seek.I let them show off how desperate they are for attention and how they are ready for the nuthouse in the fact that they go around talking to themselves all the time. any rational person would laugh at their memory and reading comprehension problems they have the way they talk to themselves all the time here.lol.
according to the shills you argue with,the witnesses are lying and all these credible firefighters experienced in the sounds of explosives are clueless. they really need to start a comedy club.
Okay, name them.....really,you've spent a post trying t5o insult us ,but all you've engaged in is a bout of self loathing
Presented with evidence that refutes his claim, the cowardly 'truther' slinks away, embarrassed to admit he was wrong.
Well , if I want you to continue to posts your copy / paste of the NSA , in fact..... no ^^ This thread is boring , always the same ping pong posts => a nut from the NSA write no planes has hit the WTC 1 and 2 , and another nut 2 meters from him from the NSA post......haha , I have told you from the start that the conspiracy team is completly havroc and beleive that it was an OVNI that hit the pentagon , here are witnesses that have see the Flight 77 crashing on the Pentagon ^^ Forgetting to say that for only proof we have only a few frames of a IP video camera officially barely watchable , despite the facts that more than 60 cameras were implemented on the site of the pentagone for the security ^^ Here is my 5 new words words , enjoy ! Chesney PEOC Bunker Northern Vigilance
Here is HANNIBAL , here is something to chew on for you ^^ The Israeli Air Force has always been good at piloting F16 by remote control , perharps they have helped the poor US Air Force to teach them how to ^^ Whatever , pick your poison , F16 or US Drone in remote control with a pair of Mavericks ! I guess that you have forgotten to speak of the helicopter parked just in front of the side of the pentagon hit , tss ttss naughty boy ^^
You want a link ? ok , good readings ^^ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON So back to the thread here is my last 5 words for the day enjoy ! Death Demolition WT7 Danny Jowanko
So bleedin' what? No witnesses saw any of those objects at any location remotely related to the attacks of 9/11. No damage remotely like that which any of them can do is associated with any of the targets. If you want to introduce wierd crap like this, at least explain how it could possibly work. Nobody has yet, so take it back to the latrine you dug it out of unless you are ready to demonstrate it at work.
The clueless ones are the ones who claim that statements made by fire fighters confirm demolition charges. They do not, regardless what that crazy Canadian Budhist monk claims. He's out of his area of competency. The blithering idiot cites two EMTs who saw the same thing as having both given evidence of bombs when the more mentally healthy of the two specificly says that they were not bombs, but cars cooking off. You people really need new hobbies.
None of the whistle blowers who lost their jobs had anything to say that proves any of the crap that the twoofers are selling. The only architects selling twoofism are those around little Dickie Gage, and that dimwit makes wild claims about fire science that just do not jibe with reality. The moron can't even tell the difference between paint and thermite. What a loser. And the only "general" who makes any positive assertion that something other than an airliner hit the Pentagon is a senile old coot who thought that it was actually possible to kill a goat by staring at, that you can look over somebodies shoulder from a thousand miles away and that if you thought about it enough, you couldwalk through a door without opening it. The old coot was out of his freaking mind. He is also a sleazebag who boinked around on his wife, divorced her after she had cancer, then quit his paying job to play house with his bimbo and toldl the court he couldn't afford to pay alimony any more. The court slapped him down and told him he couldn't do that. So to this very day, Stubblebine v Stubblebine is cited as a precedent in Virginia family law for what you CANNOT do. Crazy old Bert led you all down the rabbit hole.
I'd say the clueless ones are the ones who have seen the proof that it was an inside job and still stick with the official version as the proof is pretty clear but... http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144746 ..they're not really clueless; they're experiencing cognitive dissonance. http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/dissonance.htm People who've seen the proof and still stick with the official version should watch this video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEGgAk1AbA4
Posted by an idiot who cannot tell the difference between the trail of smoke left by an aircraft damaged in a collision with several objects and the horizontal blue and red lines in front of it which are the actual aircraft. Every link leades to eithera drooling idiot or something that should be more appropriately said about the kind of people who accept the photyo analysese that the twoofs offer. As a fire fighter, I have toconclude that the cumulative mental energy of the people contributing to those articles would not supply a hamster.
Its a bit weird your nickname on this Website => Leftysergeant => mdr ^^ why not NSAsergeant ? better no ? ^^ How are the latrine at the NSA ? ^^ Never heard or seen a C130 from Andrews AFB circling near the Pentagon the 9/11 ? Explain me the 2 hours when even the firefighters have had to stop to rescue the people inside the Pentagon and the timeline to recoved the pseudo "Black Box" of the pseudo flight 77 , "lefty-ahem-genius" ... ^^ Not tired to write the same old bullcraps all the time ? Here are my 5 daily words => enjoy : Carswell (AFB) Susan Lindauer Extreme Prejudice Chew on that "lefty" ....euh.... seargent or whatever..... Good reading
You can always tell the ones who have no ability to debate the facts when they have to insult a person based on their name and then run away from the topic at hand. Notice how the latest truther wannabe was unable to address the fact that not one witness backs up his bull(*)(*)(*)(*) claim, yet there were plenty who witnessed what absolutely could NOT be what he claimed? He has to run away and pretend his NEW facts are somehow more relevant than the ones he just got done claiming were the relevant ones. Truthers must go through a lot of shoes. Then again, like all truthers, he gets the "facts" so messed up that one has to question either his credibility or his extreme gullibility. Yes, there was a C-130 that was flying by the Pentagon. He was there at the request of ATC which was asking him if he could see the unidentified plane. [video=youtube;HFTNPEmZHXE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFTNPEmZHXE[/video] It is obvious English is a challenge for you. Care to explain what you mean by "Explain me the 2 hours when even the firefighters have had to stop to rescue the people inside the Pentagon and the timeline to recoved the pseudo "Black Box" of the pseudo flight 77 , "lefty-ahem-genius" ... ^^"? I ask the same thing of all truthers who come here. Where is your evidence? Can you post one piece of real evidence? Not your paranoid delusions. Not people's opinions. Evidence. As in the kind that would hold up in a court of law. OK, everyone! Get ready! Here come the insults, the running away from the facts and the pretending he is somehow intelligent!
Their handlers sure pay them a lot of money to constantly keep coming back for their arse beatings they constantly get here.I love it how they try and dodge these facts these experienced firefighters experienced in explosives or demolition experts as well as architects and engineers are cluleless. they will come back of course and say they are in the minority that there are millions of others that disagree with them.the shills of course in the process ignore that if the speak out and tell the truth,they end up like Danny Jowenko. you just got to love their logic,that all these experts are lying and the zionists controlled media and all these corrupt government institutions with a lonnnnnnggggggggggggggggggg history og government corruption,are all telling the truth.that congress is not bought off and corrupt,that they all have our best interests at heart in looking out for us.comedy gold.these comedians need to start a comedy club.like i said,their handlers sure pay them a lot of money,no way on earth would they keep coming back everyday constantly to embarrass themselves everyday like they always do here ending up with egg on their face.
Oki my english writing is bad , its not a surprised for me , and tell me how is your french writing ? ^^ After you insult me , saying that I am running away from the facts and stupid , oki if it pleased you I can live with that , especially if it come from you ^^ At first sight I have beleived that your video posted was about the Golf game installed on your computer ^^ In fact no , twas simply about your good fella the Lt Col steve O'Brien , the C130 guy who lie faster than his shadow View attachment 14311 a good guy always ready to offer an helping hand ^^ View attachment 14310 http://www.thepentacon.com/Topic11.htm Good reading , watchdoggy911 ^^ Oooups yes , I have nearly forgotten , a DC 130 really exist , it look like a very usefull plane for the US drones View attachment 14312 Have a nice et sunny day even in England ^^
Non existant. Who would want to write in French? If I DID want to write on a French speaking board, I would make sure what I was wr I didn't insult you. That is what you do. The fact you can't defend your own claims isn't my fault. Really? Wow. Explains a lot, doesn't it. And we're suppose to just believe the words of a frenchman? Actually, your nationality doesn't matter. Nobody is going to believe you based on your good word because you've already been caught pretending issues exist where no issues exist. So how about backing up your claim? With what? Broken links? I've read it before. Apparently some people are incapable of getting everything to add up. Obviously something hit the Pentagon at the angle over a hundred witnesses saw it hit from. CIT claims the other plane flew over the Pentagon based on the testimony of a handful of witnesses and then lie about their testimony claiming that the plane came in at an even more extreme angle than the witnesses claimed. Of course, testimony is always overridden by physical evidence. Not one person claimed there were two planes, yet you have all the physical evidence showing one angle and CIT pretending a radically different angle. If there were two planes as some pretend, why didn't a single person see two planes and why didn't a single person see a plane flying away from the Pentagon? US drones aren't flown from C-130s. There is no point for it, since the cameras onboad the UAV are used to fly the plane from remote locations. Not in England. I'm in Colorado. Is there ANYTHING you get right?
This is one of the more braindead "theories" out there. Look at how many people caught the planes at the twin towers? Of course people would have caught images of a plane flying away. And don't those witnesses all say the plane hit the building? CIT = DOA
I don't agree with Patriot on everything. But what you are describing is not true and more applicable to "truther" trolls. Ahem.
