9 11 John Kerry Admits that WTC7 Was Brought Down By Controlled Demolition!

Discussion in '9/11' started by Eadora, Nov 20, 2015.

  1. Eadora

    Eadora Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2010
    Messages:
    3,389
    Likes Received:
    426
    Trophy Points:
    83
    .


    9 11 John Kerry Admits that
    WTC7 Was Brought Down By Controlled Demolition!


    This is NEWS you will not find on Faux or CNN etc
    Kerry Fk's Up again & spills the Milk :roflol:

    Okay so how much Prep did they have to do to bring a Building like that down into its foot print ? –
    ................................................... Six or Seven hours after the collapse & Chaos of WTC I & II ?

    Chalk up ONE for the Conspiracy Theorists ! :clapping:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbReTl3Uin0
    [video=youtube;jbReTl3Uin0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbReTl3Uin0[/video]

    John Kerry
    “I do know that – that ah - we remember the danger – And they made the decision
    based on the danger of destroying other things - that they did it in a controlled fashion”



    Ah - ---- WTF ! & they were able to do it - - BEFORE IT HAPPENED ??? :shock: WOW that's cutting it Close

    [video=youtube;ltP2t9nq9fI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltP2t9nq9fI[/video]


    .
     
  2. Alucard

    Alucard New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    7,829
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wow! Spoken from John Kerry, that is a startling revelation!
     
  3. starcitizen

    starcitizen Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2015
    Messages:
    1,114
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Literally everything those two (*)(*)(*)(*)tarded products of incest reprobates said is debunked bull(*)(*)(*)(*) which has been proven to be false too many times to count, Steven Jones is not a physicist or engineer, pull it was referring to the firefighters, Larry Silverstein lost millions due to 911, and open your ears twoofer Kerry didn't say WTC7 he was obviously confused by these nutters line of questioning and he said the Wall as in obvious reference to the south tower wall which was pulled down during the cleanup operations:

    http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92426

    Thread reported.
     
  4. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,840
    Likes Received:
    167
    Trophy Points:
    63
    The proof that building seven fell because of controlled demolition is crushing. His having said that may get a lot of closed-minded people to look at the proof.

    September 11 -- The New Pearl Harbor (FULL)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DOnAn_PX6M
    (4:30:50 time mark)

    Explosives Technician - Loader - AE911Truth.org
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5IgqJXyLbg

    The Death of Controlled Demolition Expert Danny Jowenko after Speaking about 9/11 WTC 7 Building 7
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zHHvo6U4lA

    Architects & Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7 - AE911Truth.org
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw
     
  5. Eadora

    Eadora Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2010
    Messages:
    3,389
    Likes Received:
    426
    Trophy Points:
    83
    "Thread Reported" - :roflol: - Your cowardice is showing
    Have to attempt to silence anything that contradicts the analysis of your Official yet discredited Lies :cool:

    To say Steven Jones is NOT a Physicist is a LIE - I suggest you get up to speed on the Truth of it
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_E._Jones


    POOR SHOW BROS POOR SHOW :chew:
    If John Kerry's recent Idiotic slip is not worthy NEWS what the Hell is ?
    The WTC LIE that has been played to you Sheep has cost you your Constitutionally granted Liberties

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Yah Kerry was confused - Same as the BBC announcer was confused
    Perhaps you should review from the 1:55 min mark on the Vid

    The context of the question to Kerry was clearly World Trade Center 7.
    And Larry Silverstien was clearly talking about World Trade Center 7
    when he made his statement - "And they made that decision to Pull..". -

    For your info Steven Jones
    is a respected Physicist considered a step up on the academic food chain from a mere Engineer
    & Architects & Engineers for Truth sport 2389 accredited members of those professions

    For Your Info:
    Structural Engineer: WTC Towers Did Not Collapse from(*)Fire
    https://tobefree.wordpress.com/2008...gineer-wtc-towers-did-not-collapse-from-fire/


    Re: the Idiot Kerry who slipped on the Banana he uses for a tongue : :mrgreen:

    You seem never to have heard of Parapraxis aka Freudian Slip have you "starcitizen" ?-
    Whereby the Truth leaks out of the Lying Mouth

    Another startling example of Parapraxis coming out of a filthy lying mouth for you to consider :roflol:

    We Are Speeding Up The Training of ISIL Forces
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bTXcvV9cBfM
     
  6. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He was correct about Steve Jones and did not lie. Jones is no expert or authority.

    AEfor911 truth is also fraudulent. That website is open to anyone and the 1389 people on that site who signed the petition are not accredited at all they are self proclaimed. They are wal mart workers and fast food workers and janitors and security guards and many others who simply claim to be what they are not.

    Sorry all twoofer claims have long since been debunked and there i no evidence whatsoever of controlled demolition in building 7 or WTC
     
  7. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Would the OP care to debate the scientific details of the WTC7 collapse without all the noise, pretty colours and hysterical fonts? Just the facts?
     
  8. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What's with the random letters typed in large font?
     
  9. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,136
    Likes Received:
    396
    Trophy Points:
    83
    that ship already sunk on you , I know because I sunk it
     
  10. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,136
    Likes Received:
    396
    Trophy Points:
    83
    The mods have better things to do than laugh their asses off at someone reporting the OP for posting truth about building 7.

    you havent even seen pictures of these places much less visited them much less worked in them and not even in your best fantasy performed research work in them. lol
     
  11. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No you never did you only ran from it

    - - - Updated - - -

    He posted no truth
     
  12. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,136
    Likes Received:
    396
    Trophy Points:
    83
    like 911 you have that backwards, yes I did and I ran to it, not from it. please stop misquoting the facts.

    Of course he posted truth, deniers on the other hand cant recognize truth if it bit them in the ass, otherwise they wouldnt be posers.
     
  13. phoenyx

    phoenyx New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2013
    Messages:
    393
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's interesting. What I'd like to know is, when was this recording made?
     
  14. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That is an outright lie.

    You have never debated or acknowledged any facts about 911 in general or wtc 7 specifically you have only made assertions and run from any evidence or facts because no evidence or facts support your assertions.

    The op did not state any evidence..
     
  15. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,136
    Likes Received:
    396
    Trophy Points:
    83
    That is an outright lie, I posted volumes of evidence, but there arent any posers around who know what evidence is so they can post lies and convince themselves they are telling the truth.
     
  16. starcitizen

    starcitizen Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2015
    Messages:
    1,114
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You're a cliche.
     
  17. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh look. The troll is back. How boring. :sleeping:
     
  18. Eadora

    Eadora Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2010
    Messages:
    3,389
    Likes Received:
    426
    Trophy Points:
    83
    :roflol:
    Have you got a Porcelain Telephone with a Flush Handle into which to stuff that Load of Lies ?

    It is rather the Official NIST Line that has been thoroughly Debunked & shown to be Absurd
    .................................................................."WTC was brought down symmetrically at freefall by fire"
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Re. the flat out bald LIE regarding Steven Jones
    Steven Jones is an accredited Physicist :
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_E._Jones Ta Dah
    & unless your Willful Ignorance prevents you, you should be aware that Physicists
    .................. are a step up on the academic food chain from Architects & Engineers
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    & another Lie you proffer here Exposed:
    Architects & Engineers For Truth
    Only Credential Professionals Need Apply for Accredited Membership
    http://www1.ae911truth.org/en/news/...edentialed-professionals-need-only-apply.html

    ....open to any high-rise architect and structural engineer team currently LICENSED in
    .. any state within the United States or in any province in Canada, including any active
    ...........FULL PROFESSOR of either of these disciplines at an accredited architectural or
    ..................................................................................................... engineering school.


    They have 2,389 accredited professional members & 20,435 other signatories
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    & NIST has been forced to admit that WTC 7 collapse was initially at Freefall acceleration

    A Physical impossibility
    unless ALL supporting columns were made to fail perfectly simultaneously & Symmetrical
    .......................................Something Physically impossible for an Asymmetrical fire to do
    .................................. .....Something Only Possible with a carefully planned and executed DEMOLITION

    Bottom Line
    An almost perfectly Symmetrical collapse at Freefall, after incurring Asymmetrical damage, IS a Physical impossibility
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Willfully Ignorant
    You post no truth

    .
     
  19. Eadora

    Eadora Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2010
    Messages:
    3,389
    Likes Received:
    426
    Trophy Points:
    83
    & you sir are a Loser :roflol: - Your resort to Ad Hominem only exposes your Bogus Case -
    ...............................................It's the best you can do - a sure sign of a loser - Thanx for the Win !

    WTC 7 Evaluation
    http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/?u=d03bf3ffcac549c7dc7888ef5&id=d5e38f3000&e=

    World Trade Center Building 7 Evaluation is an engineering study at the University of Alaska Fairbanks
    (UAF) using finite element modeling to evaluate the possible causes of World Trade Center Building 7’s
    collapse. The study is being conducted by Dr. J. Leroy Hulsey, Chair of UAF's Civil and Environmental
    Engineering Department, and two Ph.D. research assistants. Professionals from the fields of structural
    engineering, civil engineering, mechanical engineering, architecture, building design and construction,
    physics, math, and science, as well as everyday citizens, are invited to get involved. Every aspect of the
    scientific process will be posted on http://WTC7Evaluation.org. The study is being crowd-funded
    by the nonprofit organization Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

    [video=youtube;C-VNjYXU-CE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-VNjYXU-CE [/video]
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-VNjYXU-CE
     
  20. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's true. John Kerry may be an idiot, but the rest of us aren't. There is no evidence for a controlled demolition on 9/11. The story is illogical, impractical and irrational and there is not one scrap of evidence to support such a silly tale. We know Gage got it wrong, Chandler got it wrong and Pepper got it wrong. What stunt will Gage pull next? See above.
     
  21. Veryclever

    Veryclever New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2015
    Messages:
    211
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    But but, illumanti, reptilian shapeshifters from the moon, hitler is in the hollow earth with dinosaurs, tupac is in cuba, jet fuel can't melt steel beams lol
     
  22. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You really fill your posts with excess noise, don't you?

    From that mess I can ascertain that you believe the old lies 'symmetrical collapse' and 'free fall' descent, neither of which are strictly true, and what do these canards mean to you? I'll rephrase that, even if these canards were true, how do they prove a controlled demolition to you in light of the lack of physical evidence?

    So you've either read Chandler or some site that quotes him. Chandler got the speed of the collapse wrong and only measured the time it took the curtain wall to collapse (app. 6 seconds). Chandler did not know that the interior began to collapse 11 seconds earlier, so his figure for free fall is wrong. The NIST only recorded free-fall on the NE corner for 2.25 seconds at the 12.5 second mark into the collapse, so that has no bearing on the initiation of the collapse.

    Symmetrical means nothing as that is how one would expect the curtain wall to behave with no interior to support it.

    I hope that helps.

    <Reply to Deleted>
     
  23. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No it is fact and it is you posting the bald faced lie.

    Anyone looking at all of your posts on allthreads will see no evidence of any kind and you run like a coward from all evidence which provers you wrong
     
  24. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    NIST and the official report has never been debunked no matter how hard you assert otherwise.

    Neither you nor anyone else has produced evidence to refute it.

    NIST is a report, reports are not forced to do anything and there was no free fall of WTC 7 or any other tower.

    No such admission was ever made.

    AEfor911 truth does not screen or check any petition signers which is why the petition signers are anyone who wishes to sign up and not architects or engineers. That is a fact little one deal with it.

    Anyone can sign their petition and has including circus clowns and kids living in moms basement like you
     
  25. phoenyx

    phoenyx New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2013
    Messages:
    393
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    They have 2 lists. You're referring to the following list of supporters of A&E, not the actual list of Architects and Engineers:
    http://www.ae911truth.org/signatures/general.html

    The one for actual architects and engineers is here:
    http://www1.ae911truth.org/faqs/798-who-are-these-2000-architects-and-engineers.html

    It is tightly screened: "Each of [the] domestic A/E signer is contacted personally by phone by one of the Verification Team volunteers. Most of these professionals are surprised, then satisfied and thankful for the time and effort we spend verifying their credentials. After making personal contact with each signer, the volunteer reviews the signer&#8217;s credentials. If contact cannot be made or if appropriate credentials cannot be found, we do not count or display the signer on our A/E professionals list." Full article on the screening process:
    http://www1.ae911truth.org/home/430-credibility.html
     

Share This Page