Discussion in '9/11' started by Bob0627, Dec 9, 2016.
Well Coward, report the inaccuracies....
Already done troll, multiple times as you well know, but keep pretending they were never posted, that's your agenda, you have nothing else to offer but repetitious BS. It's ok, the more you ask the more they get to be posted, thanks for the help.
Sorry coward...no quotes on either link from the 9/11 Commission Report. So it's still bullet proof...
Yeah and there's definitely a Santa Claus and a Tooth Fairy for the trolls and the brain dead.
Again Coward....quote the report's inaccuracies. If you can find any.
good lets see a copy of the tickets the jihackers purchased.
Same standard applies.
None of your claims has any accuracy merit or credibility unless you can quote a specific passage you think is false AND show evidence that it is not true.
That reminds me of this story:
Consider this, on November 12th, 2001, just a month after the attack on the WTC, the second deadliest plane crash to date in the US took place just outside JFK Airport. All on board, including 5 on the ground died, a total of 265 people. Almost immediately, as per all known and required lawful proceedings, the flight manifest was released. In fact, you can still see it today online here: //www.theguardian.com/world/2001/nov/15/airbuscrash.usa
Matt Campbell has sent repeated queries demanding flight manifests for the planes involved in the 9/11 crashes. He has been routinely ignored or belaid by claims of national security. One wonders if this is the same type of national security that required millions of tons of literal murder evidence to be carted off to China. The clearing of virtually all the WTC building rubble, without any investigative study of said debris is just one more crime piled on top of a myriad of crimes surrounding that fateful day.
More complete bullshit.
The manifests have been available for years.
Bobo the clown once again hears and sees only what he wants to hear and see to support his " i hate government " dogma.
Had he bothered to do five minutes of research he would see how fictitious his claims are but then he could not keep claiming the government lies all the time about everything.
He would also have to bother fact checking and examining the governments reports and evidence which he has never done.
Intelligent people look at both sides not just cherry picked claims which they WANT to believe.
Obviously Bobo is not one of those people
Bob0627 is incredibly weak at this.
He claims a bunch of proven BS and then ADMITS that he has no clue about anything the government says. He will not entertain anything the government reports and not trouble himself to read the government reports and discover what they said. He simply repeats second or third hand stories from people he agrees with and never fact checks.
He claims to question government but NEVER DOES.
Preaching that the government is covering up and lying IS NOT QUESTIONING.
In this instance had he bothered to check he might have found this.
or even this.
Naturally had he bothered to read anything other than completely idiotic conspiracy fools he might have known that the investigation he wants WAS done he just does not like the conclusion.
Next up bobo will screech about government being evil liars blah blah blah and only he knows the truth.
Without fairly high reading and comprehension skills, one is unable to completely understand what the report found.
I have above average reading skills.
Skills mean nothing when you refuse to even bother read it.
You have never read it like the other conspiracy nuts here. Therefore you have no clue what it says.
You willfully refuse to do so because it would prove many of your claims false.
You cannot say that the report is false or lies or a coverup when you refuse to even state one specific example quoted from the report.
Generally, the entire report (this forum's limitations will not allow me to post it all here, sorry troll), but here's the link:
"http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/911Report.pdf" (I've put the link within quotation marks to signify quoting the entire report for the troll's convenience).
Specifically (more or less):
The title: "The 9/11 Commission Report". It was actually the Bush/Cheney/Zelikow report, they had nearly complete control over what evidence was given to the 9/11 Commission, the eyewitnesses and their testimony (via Soviet style "minders"), the outline, the contents and the final edit.
The entire Preface (sorry troll, forum limitations again). See Post #20 for further detail:
Chapter 1 "WE HAVE SOME PLANES” (limitations again) is unsupported by any scientific/forensic evidence and contradicted by it in some cases. See Post #24 for further detail.
Chapters 5 and 7 and all verbiage within the report allegedly supported with 3rd party relayed unsupported torture "testimony", generally found in about 25% of the footnotes.
The numerous unanswered and/or incomplete answers to 9/11 families questions:
The enormous amount of unknown ("classified") evidence/documents/eyewitness testimony/failure to conduct eyewitness interviews/lack of any forensic/scientific/criminal investigation interviews, etc. not present within the report.
This includes but is not limited to the majority of the 570 cubic feet of documents and the 80,000+ pages of documents from the FBI's PENTBBOM "investigation" and all and any detailed technical information on the destruction of the towers and the Pentagon (left to NIST), the failure to mention one word about the destruction of WTC7.
There is quite a bit more but any fool with a reasonable level of intelligence should be able to come to the conclusion that the above renders the entire report a worthless scam (trolls included).
If you'd like to see it again, just record the link to this post for future reference. You're welcome troll.
Massive failure and evasion again.
Granted you took a closer step by at least posting a link to the report but you failed to quote a specific passage and merely claim you quoted the whole thing.
You have never provided evidence of any kind that Bush/Cheney and Zeikow had ANY control over evidence, witnesses or testimony.
You have yet to point out a single contradiction or evidence that there are any.
You state an out right lie about the first chapter which includes massive evidence to support it's narrative.
Much like your claim that no one can find the flight manifests which was destroyed you still have yet to offer any evidence
I should have added that torture "testimony", of which it wasn't even really that because ALL of it does not come directly from those who were tortured or even from the torturers, but from 3rd parties so it's strictly faith based. The 9/11 Commission were not allowed to interview any detainees, thanks to the completely control by the Bush administration via their planted crony Philip Zelikow and other methods. This is the same garbage that all legitimate courts reject and that the Senate Intelligence Committee on Torture report claims yielded NO USEFUL INTELLIGENCE. So not only are Chapters 5 and 7 worthless but all parts of the 9/11 Commission Report which are supported by those footnotes are worthless as well. So even if you take some parts of the report as having some value, the vast majority has none. And unfortunately, when most of a report is worthless, it renders the entire report worthless because the worthless portion renders the rest of it unreliable and worthless as well. It's like if you interview an eyewitness and determine most of what he/she says is a lie, what part of the testimony would you trust to be reliable (never mind "accurate")?
Senate report says CIA torture methods yielded no useful intelligence
I posted all this several times before but I have no problem re-posting for those who missed it and actually want to know. It's amazing how trolls can serve a useful purpose at times.
I didnt ask for a song and dance I want to see the receipts for the purchase of those tickets since we have no bodies. cough them up please, or if you do not have them go back to your corner.
back to nuremburg, if you dont hear what you want beat em till you do testimomy.
I asked you first for evidence of a coverup you provided none.
Stop evading and answer
nothing to evade, the fact that you cannot provide the requested evidence to prove the states case proves the coverup, try again.
Uh no it proves nothing of the sort.I provided absolute evidence of flight manifests which is as good as a ticket.
The fact that you cannot provide evidence of any kind whatsoever.
Cough up some evidence
Good to see you back Koko.
Speaking of, the US is a signatory to the Nuremburg Principles and all international treaties that reference war crimes (which of course includes torture). All international treaties that US is a signatory to are incorporated into the Constitution via the Supremacy clause (Article VI Paragraph 2). As such, the Bush administration is a war crimes administration, a significant violator of the Constitution (see Article VI Paragraph 3 - Oath of Office) and a treasonous administration (see Article III Section 3) by covering up 9/11 and therefore "adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort".
Its takes me about 30 seconds to produce a flight manifest so stop trying to pass off bullshit as evidence, and lets see those 3rd party receipts, try again.
Wrong boy it is hardcore evidence you cannot reproduce. I DARE you to try.
It devastated and crushed your friend bobo the clown and it crushes you.
It is absolute evidence in your face and you know it.
proving it is your kind who does the lying and denial of fact.
Now answer up junior.
Quote one specific passage from the report which is false and prove it is a lie.
Bob now you see why I am gone most of the time, posers have nothing of merit to add to the discussion.
nazi, I gave you a like for proving my point, thanks.
You failed and I debunked your point.
You are gone most of the time because you have been consistently and routinely crushed by evidence as you were here
Answer the question
Separate names with a comma.