9/11 Official Conspiracy Theory Questions

Discussion in '9/11' started by Bob0627, Dec 9, 2016.

  1. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,822
    Likes Received:
    368
    Trophy Points:
    83

    Bob, there you have it, adolescents throw any **** at the wall thats handy despite how senseless it is, then demand answers because it maxed out the extent of their ability to comprehend or they find themselves incapable of defending their nutty positions.

    nazi I am under no obligation to respond to your strawman rants. sorry, try again.
     
    Last edited: Apr 18, 2017
    Bob0627 likes this.
  2. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,313
    Likes Received:
    1,168
    Trophy Points:
    113
    True but their posts often prompt me to post many relevant facts and issues about 9/11. I started the threads called The NIST 9/11 Scam Exposed in All Its Glory and The 9/11 Commission Scam Scam Exposed in all its Glory because the trolls asked for it. Now new members and others who haven't been exposed to the facts about the NIST, the 9/11 Commission and their reports can get an education about those scams in the appropriate threads rather than scattered in other threads.

    As for you, I miss your sarcasm, it's one of the best and more importantly, you've often posted facts/issues I haven't come across before.

    That fanatical troll is a total waste of time. All he has in his repertoire is insanely repetitive: "wrong, you, you, you, no, no, no, you never read, you never presented evidence, prove the OCT (which he claims there's no such thing) is wrong (lame reverse burden of proof idiocy)", ridicule, name calling and denial of everything that questions/contradicts the OCT (even denies it's ever been posted) and claims he questions the US government but can't post a single link to prove it, among other absurd nonsense. So I grew tired of his cow manure and he now has the dubious honor of being the only poster I've ever put on ignore in any forum. There are plenty of other trolls in this section of the forum that help serve my agenda.
     
  3. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,822
    Likes Received:
    368
    Trophy Points:
    83
    there is a school of [un]thought out there that the gubmint can come out with anything they want without the need to prove a thing.

    The same as if they wrote you a traffic ticket for doing 90 in a 25 with nikes then posers follow up demanding the gubmint is correct unless you can prove you were not wearing nikes.

    posers wont get it, but definitely a pun intended! LOL
     
    Last edited: Apr 18, 2017
    Bob0627 likes this.
  4. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It was a question not a rant and you only evade answering it out of cowardice thus proving i am correct.

    You never read the report you have no idea what it says and cannot refute any of it
     
  5. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I did not reverse burden of proof you reversed it.
    You are making accusations with no evidence of any kind and the burden is on you to support them.

    you cannot do so because all you can do is repeat the same assertions without even an attempt to provide evidence
     
  6. usda_select

    usda_select Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Dear Bob.

    Do you know how to quote something? Like if I was to quote from the book, A Tale of Two Cities, I would do the following: "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times"--A Tale of Two Cities.

    When you're asked to quote something, that is what you're being to do.

    In the future, when you're asked to quote the inaccuracies in the report (if you ever find any), the passage in red is what you're being told to fetch. Please refer to this guide in the future.

    Regards,

    USDA-Select
     
  7. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,313
    Likes Received:
    1,168
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah I'll be sure to. Please send me some of what you're smokin'
     
  8. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your the one suffering from a delusion and confusing fiction with fact
     
    usda_select likes this.
  9. usda_select

    usda_select Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    28
    The truly hilarious part is that I think the twoofers may be just illiterate. They don’t know how to quote passages from a text. Illiteracy and abject idiocy go hand in hand I suppose.
     
  10. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,313
    Likes Received:
    1,168
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You mean like ridicule and name calling go hand in hand with trolling? Trolls also believe everyone who disagrees with them is illiterate, an idiot or both, just like any typical school age child. That's why their favorite tactic is ridicule and name calling, because that's what children do and it works ... for other children.
     
  11. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You just described yourself.

    You consistently refuse to respond to or address reasonable requests for evidence and simply insult and ridicule those who do not share your strict hatred of government
     
  12. Denizen

    Denizen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2013
    Messages:
    9,197
    Likes Received:
    4,545
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Why would flight 177 do such a loop to hit the Pentagon when it could have hit from a direct route without the loop.

    The flight path creates a suspcion that the objective of the pilot of flight 77, or whatever hit the Pentagon, had a very specific target in mind in the Pentagon.

    The hit was made on the investigative section searching for the missing trillions Donald Rumsfeld exposed immediately before 9/11.

    [​IMG]

     
    Eleuthera and Bob0627 like this.
  13. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,313
    Likes Received:
    1,168
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Eleuthera likes this.

Share This Page