9/11 Truth for Dummies: Why Near-Free Fall Speed Was Impossible Without Explosives

Discussion in '9/11' started by Munkle, Mar 29, 2014.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. n0spam

    n0spam New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2014
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That is Mr. Truther 2 U!
     
  2. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No,truther.
     
  3. n0spam

    n0spam New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2014
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So you disrespect not only the truth, but the persons who deliver it.

    Do YOU believe that airliner crash + fire = the exact same result
    as months of careful study of the structure & precision placement of explosives
    and the precision timed detonation of said explosives?
     
  4. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No,I disrespect YOU because you DON'T 'bring truth'

    And again it wasn't JUST the crash and fire
     
  5. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Nope. And the WTC collapse evidence proves no controlled demolition.
     
  6. n0spam

    n0spam New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2014
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    you say "nope" HOWEVER, what is the explanation for the complete & total destruction of 3 skyscrapers?
    Unfocused energy from fires = same result as months of engineering & precision placement of explosives and
    precision timed detonation of said explosives. what?
     
  7. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gravity's a (*)(*)(*)(*)(*),kid
     
  8. n0spam

    n0spam New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2014
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    obviously you have not grasped the concept

    Unfocused energy from fires being the equivalent of months of engineering
    and precision placed explosives and precision timed detonation of said explosives.
    how is that done?
     
  9. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The collapse of the towers, from an engineering standpoint, does not resemble controlled demolition. The key word here is "controlled". In the destruction of the seven buildings of the WTC, the collapse was wild and uncontrolled. Nearby structures were affected, none of the buildings fell into their footprint and none of the collapses initiated from explosives.

    You have been fed false information from the 'truther' group.
     
  10. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Plane crash into buildings,plane damage strucural stability of building,fires weaken remaining structure,gravity does rest.

    No need for 'months of engineering'

    And NO explosives.

    Simple enough for you now?,or should I try to dumb it down more?
     
  11. n0spam

    n0spam New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2014
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Really? that is in the case of the North Tower
    the top 15% of the building Collapses down on to the remaining 85%
    and causes complete & total destruction, and you believe that explosives
    could not possibly have been a factor.

    right ...... & I'm the Easter Bunny!
     
  12. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    each floor was essentally 'hanging on' to the interior columns and the perimiter walls by 'hangers' that the floor trusses were resting on,the 'top 15%' only had to deal with the structural failure of each floor,andthe perimiter walls failed it was like peeling a giant banana.
    each floor that went increased the mass falling onto to the other floorsand the collapse sped up.

    Simple.
     
  13. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Answer a question. If I throw a baseball at the window of a house, explain why the window breaks when I have the entire weight of the house attached to and behind said window. Shouldn't the weight of the house and it's entire structural help that window resist breaking?
     
  14. amartin7889

    amartin7889 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2013
    Messages:
    631
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    28
    The amazing thing about 9/11 Truth is that it reinforces itself. Any evidence that tries to refute the conspiracy is evidence of the conspiracy itself. Who could possibly convince them to change their mind? Noam Chomsky, George Galloway, and Glenn Greenwald are all left gatekeepers. NIST was part of the conspiracy. Forget anyone on the right. What would it take to change the 9/11 movement's mind?
     
  15. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    really?

    Tell us how we can tell the difference
     
  16. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Last

    [​IMG]

    911 the day of the long noses

    Fixed!
     
  17. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Still nothing to support the lie of controlled demolition. Just the usual pack of lies and misinformation by the nutters.
     
  18. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thats all you got is liar liar? How (*)(*)(*)(*)ing lame is that!

    Feel free to explain freefall under natural collapse conditions.
     
  19. n0spam

    n0spam New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2014
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You have been blinded by the "right vs left" fiasco
    it really doesn't matter where on the political spectrum
    you fall, its a matter of do you accept the official story at
    face value ( hijacked airliners used as weapons .... etc .... )
    or do you have the guts to question the things that NEED to
    be questioned. Have you seen the video of WTC 7 "collapsing" ?
    do you believe that the event was the product of FIRE? like 7 was
    a towering inferno and it just collapsed ... just like that(?)
    or do you question the event & the official explanation because its
    extremely suspicious?

    Logic & reason dictate that we MUST question
    bits of our world that are incongruous. like the disconnect
    between the events we can see, and the explanation(s) offered up
    by the talking heads on TV.
     
  20. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :roll: Oh brother
     
  21. n0spam

    n0spam New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2014
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    so in other words, in the absence of a proper rebutal, you post two words ...... and a cartoon .....

    whatever .......
     
  22. amartin7889

    amartin7889 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2013
    Messages:
    631
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    28
    You've been asking about WTC 7 for 13 years. No answer yet.
     
  23. n0spam

    n0spam New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2014
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You seem to be a thinking being, do tell, when viewing the video of WTC7
    "collapsing" what do YOU think? do you know that the only way to get the
    result as documented on video, is to have ALL of the support fail out from
    under the falling structure, and all at the same time?
     
  24. amartin7889

    amartin7889 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2013
    Messages:
    631
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Why would they blow up WTC 7 if it would make discovery of their conspiracy that much more obvious?
     
  25. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    thats a fantasy, it was and is a well known fact they demo'd 7.

    the only thing left with regard to 7 is nist flasifying its data
     

Share This Page