911 - Preschool Demolition for Dummies.

Discussion in '9/11' started by Kokomojojo, Feb 6, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113



    you meant to say collapse lol
     
  2. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, the buildings definitely collapsed. (Hint: they are no longer there.)
     
  3. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,670
    Likes Received:
    3,709
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Says the guy that thinks the mathematics required to describe the collapse are meaningless.

    Koko, the math is meaningless in the same sense that a pantone color chart is meaningless to a dog.
     
  4. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113

    that was incredible!

    collapsed buildings arent there anymore

    [​IMG]
     
  5. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Exactly. There is evidence of collapse. There is zero evidence of CD.

    Glad we agree, Jojo.
     
  6. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    got any more?

    [​IMG]
     
  7. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Every CD results in a collapse

    [​IMG]



    PROVE IT!
     
  8. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's been proven. Don't get upset that you don't understand, or don't like the results.
     
  9. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    no it has not.

    citation
     
  10. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You still have to show proof of a CD first,junior.....

    Fail.
     
  11. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    so you think I need to prove his claim!

    [​IMG]


    think again
     
  12. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,670
    Likes Received:
    3,709
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I've got more than you have photos.

    You see, if you really want to describe the collapse, you have to do more than just look at pictures. People who graduated from preschool use things called words and mathematics to define and demonstrate the world around them.

    They don't just look at pictures.

    After all, pictures don't explain the mechanics of a collapse on their own. And in most cases, people like you don't even know what you're looking at. This creates the confusion required to let yourself believe you're actually making a cogent point. But the upside for us at least is that it doesn't take too much to prove you wrong. Just like you were when you posted that move scene that we called you out on.

    Oh..and prove there's no evidence? Did you just ask us to prove their's no evidence?

    And you want us to believe you passed the bar?
     
  13. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You realize that its really easy to do in this matter.

    Are you asking muah to spell it out and educate you? LOL
     
  14. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Far easier for you to, than him proving a negative,slick..
     
  15. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Do you get the feeling he's never passed any kind of bar?
     
  16. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    [video=youtube;oShTJ90fC34]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oShTJ90fC34[/video]


    ..........
     
  17. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113

    It does not work that way.

    It is not proving a negative.

    Not surprising however that none of the troughers with their vast experience in these types of matters get it.
     
  18. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    We have all the evidence in the world of collapse. We have none that it was initiated by demolition charges. Floors got broken and dumped stuff on the floors below. Eventually, those floors broke in a cascade. This is simple enough for people even less intelligent than I to understand, once they learn the simple fact that steel loses bearing capacity when it gets too hot.
     
  19. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I already agreed that it collapsed.

    ALL DEMOLITIONS RESULT IN COLLAPSE. There is no argument that the damn thing collapsed.

    why do insist on going in circles?

    so you disagree with nist and stick to your pancake theory.
     
  20. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Not all collapses are due to CD. No matter how many capital letters you use, Jojo.
     
  21. plague311

    plague311 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2012
    Messages:
    1,256
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Did you see him say he believed in a pancake theory? Besides, NIST stated that the initiation of the collapse wasn't a pancake collapse. Do you know the difference?
     
  22. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    All controlled demolitions result in collapse I think is what he said.
     
  23. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There is no argument on the part about CD causing a collapse. What is in question here iswhether or not explosive charges were used to initiate the collapse. There is absolutely, without question no evidence that explosive charges were used to initiate collapse.

    Is that simple enough for you to get your mind around?
     
  24. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Indeed.

    Also true: not all collapses are because of controlled demolition.
     
  25. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I did not say that try and keep up or hire an interpreter please.
     

Share This Page