Many things can destroy cellular material to such an extent that DNA is unidentifiable. Certainly, fire is one of them.
I agree - fire will destroy DNA ! However majority of victims were above and below the fire !? ( correct ?) Also as far as I am aware hundreds of bone fragments were found years later ontop of nearby buildings - surely they were not subjected to any fire ?
... Until the buildings fell, then they were all conglomerated in a huge mess of fire, wreckage, and everything else. Can you show me where this claim is substantiated? Why? They could have been just as easily as any other pieces of debris. Why not just cut to the chase of what you're really getting ready to say, instead of faking us out with troll threads about "closure" for the victims?
The towers were NOT the typical columns and beam type structure. Using explosives to drop the towers would have required a very different approach, that is why we don't see explosions on the outside of the towers.
If the government wanted to fake a tragedy like this. Why two giant (*)(*)(*)(*)ing airplanes. It would so much simpler to attack a simpler target, they would be subtle or pawn it off on somebody else. The sensational approach is the methodology of a terrorist, its about media exposure, symbolic attacks. 911 people have not got answers because the truth is it was a major attack, massive damage and simply we were caught with our pants down.
They were designed to withstand the impact of a plane at close to landing speeds -- not a fully fueled jetliner traveling at 500+ mph. http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc_707_impact.html Demolition goes from the bottom up, not the top down. The bottom of the towers were intact UNTIL the crushing weight of the upper floors came crashing down on them. http://www.911myths.com/html/progressive_collapse.html http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc__demolition_.html
Spoken like the true lemming. With 9/11, there is so much more than meets the eye besides the actual controlled demolition and the killing of US citizens by other higher ranking US citizens. Stock fraud, insurance fraud, pre-req to invading a country (who, by the way, had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with 9/11), and on and on and on. But see, if you dug, just a little bit, you'd already know all that. Instead, you go along to get along. How's that workin' out for ya?
Yeah right...the same "crushing weight" they'd been bearing for how many years? I wish somebody could show me how concrete slabs vaporize VERTICAL steel columns (47 of them, grouped together in the core). Aluminum tubes don't fly through rows and rows of steel columns either and pop out the other side (unless the beams had "assistance" getting out of the way).
Wrong again! It was found in dust samples from all over Manhattan. You really need to do some basic research. Put down the report, and investigate. I know you can do it (unless you're paid not to).
It's not like they were just sitting there and one day collapsed. You do agree that fully fueled 757s hit the towers, don't you? If you read the info at the links I have provided, it will explain to you how they failed. I don't recall anyone claiming they were vaporized.
Lots of problems with that claim. Read more about it here. http://www.911myths.com/html/traces_of_thermate_at_the_wtc.html Plenty of links to external resources to look at if you're interested in doing some research.
Yet another 9/11 denier skipped the first week of physics: F = ma The force of that weight falling is far greater than the force of it just sitting there. Duh.
It's going very well actually, I don't doubt the possibility that the attacks could have been ignored by the government to allow for the funding of future wars to unite the masses. Nor do I believe that Iraq was not already a pre-planned invasion, but are you going to deny the fact that terrorist have actively tried to attack the US before and still do today? They had already attacked the WTC once before, and have tried to attack major SYMBOLIC targets since. Some of these attacks have succeeded, subways in London or train rails in Spain. If 9/11 was a massive conspiracy, what about the DC snipers, or the anthrax mailings. 9/11 was a conspiracy that showed the ineptitude of our government to stop these attacks.
From http://www.911myths.com/html/traces_of_thermate_at_the_wtc.html Again from http://www.911myths.com/html/traces_of_thermate_at_the_wtc.html I think Truthers is an unfair characterization of their actions and logic. I submit that "Grain of Truthers" would be more accurate.
Apples and oranges. The DC sniper was a whack job and was easily verified. The Anthrax mailings BS (cause that's what it was.. BS) all but dropped off the face of the news when it was exposed that the Anthrax was cultivated inside a Washington DC lab. Suddenly the "news" wasn't news any more. The London bombings and the Spain incidents are problematic as well, but this is about 9/11 specifically. Iraq was pre-planned and 9/11 was the key to it, and PNAC's documented agenda (their new Pearl Harbour). There are many "extensions" so to speak, of the 9/11 fiasco (many too complicated for the American Idol public to even comprehend) that go far beyond Iraq and the PNAC agenda, but, the public has to learn to crawl before it can learn to walk. So far, they're either too lazy or too ignorant (or both) to try and do either.
So because, in your opinion, "rules" were not followed to your satisfaction, then, it didn't exist at all?
Actually I think he is just looking for confirmation that there was a proper chain of custody. Because if there wasn't, then the samples are far from conclusive.
Hey hey ! No need to get abusive I'm trying to get some answears which you clearly can't answear I'm sure many people can confirm for a fact that hundreds of human bones were found on top of near by buildings I think in 2006 Now please use common sense - obviously these bones must have been blown away by the collapse and landed on top of near by buildings ! BBC article talking about the find - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/6074296.stm Now the facts Are 1208* victims unaccounted for 20,000 bits of human victims found ! Now please can some one tell me how can a collapse destroy even DNA when we have 20,000 samples ? DNA can be obtained from bones and even a glove of a murderer ( for example ) Fire could not have destroyed all the samples ? Even ones found "blown" away on top of nearby buildings - ( how on earth could hundreds of fragments been blown so far away )
Agreed there are attacks from Islamic radicles - but are they being launched due to foreign occupation ? Or some other bul reason like " they hate our freedom "?
