911 victim telling you how it is

That is a completely retarded claim. SOMETHING has to follow. Who are you going to convince with such a retarded claim with nothing else?

BTW, I told you to learn English. You just admitted you believe a 757 hit the Pentagon. Did you mean to say a 757 hit the Pentagon or did you screw up again?

 

flight 77 a 757 did not hit the pentagon.. agree with me or not it doesnt matter to me...

debunkers are frantically trying to bait me into fabricating my own scenario as to what happened...

 

Most people don't stop at the metaphorical equivalent of sticking one's fingers in one's ears and going "LA-LA-LA-LA-LA-LA" at the top of their lungs. Fine. It is your position Flight 77 didn't hit the Pentagon. You have nothing further to add and you have no evidence to back up your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) claim. So noted. Anything else to add? Seems like you're done now.

 

thank you.

 

Is this the same method you used to form your opinions? I have to believe it is.

 

That's becoming pretty apparent.

 

Ahh, the typical truther tactic of taking part of what I said to make it look like I agree with you. We both know that isn't true, but thank you for exposing the dishonesty of your posts for everyone to see! I appreciate it!

 

9/11 was not masterminded by bin laden or anyone from al qaeda.. it was planned and masterminded by unseen elements.

dont add to my statement.. nothing follows

 

The evidence tells a different story. You can have faith in your beliefs, I'll stick with the facts.

 

you act as though with a "fact" their is only one side of truth..lol..

al gore can show "facts" polar bears are dying....other people can show "facts" their not...

thank you i will keep my beliefs.

 

Most cult followers do, even in the face of evidence.

In reality, there is only one truth.

 

Then you're done. Move along.

 

Yet even Al Gore has facts. Your claims are blind beliefs without facts. Your claims blatantly ignore the evidence. Sad.

 

so you admit both sides can have "facts" ?

 

You might try reading what he posted.

 

Both sides CAN have facts, but that isn't a foregone conclusion. When it comes to 9/11, the official side has all the evidence. The truther side has absolutely zero evidence as proven by my constant asking for any one of them idiots to present a single piece of evidence. To date, not one truther has been able to post one single piece of real evidence. Now, in case you haven't noticed, when one side has all the evidence and the other side has nothing, ESPECIALLY when they are unable to even postulate what they think DID happen, well, the side with the evidence wins. Every time.

Now, do truthers have "facts" they like to pretend is evidence because of their retarded opinions? Absolutely. Does their opinion make it evidence? Not a snowball's chance in hell.

 

interesting.. there are alot of "facts" but online debunkers defuse them all.. in order to keep intact the governments fairy tail.

 

Facts can only be "defused" if the assumptions made from those facts are fundamentally flawed. For instance, some truthers think the towers fell too fast. That is their ASSumption based on their opinion. The fact is each tower fell in a certain amount of time as dictated by the laws of physics. Do truthers have evidence to back up their claim? Nope. Opinion isn't evidence. Has nothing to do with defending anything but the truth. There can only be one truth. When one has to ignore evidence as you clearly admit to doing, you can rest assured you're not looking or fighting for the truth.

So truthers keep pretending their ASSumptions are valid even though they have no evidence to back up their ASSumptions and have no interest in actually proving their claims. Trying to debate with truthers is like trying to convince the flat Earth society that the Earth is round. Funny thing is truthers actually believe they are somehow relevant when in reality they are just a joke.

 

There are zero facts or evidence from the truther cult. Lots of propaganda and group think, but zero fact.

 

There are a lot of "facts" that truthers think point to the conclusion that "the government did it" when in actuality they point to no such thing.

A couple of their favorites are:

WTC 7 was not hit by an airplane.
First time in history that three sky scrapers collapsed on the same day.

Both are indeed facts, but have nothing to do with shoring up truther theories. Some evidence might help but they don't seem to have any.

 

wtc7 was not hit by a plane. but collapsed anyway. people who were not there to see it..."explained" what happened.. no video or pic... i think i have the right to say i dont believe that..

 

So, according to your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) opinion, the only way a building can collapse is if it is hit by a plane and the only way experts can explain how something happened is if they have a video or pic. WOW! That is as retarded a set of beliefs as I have ever heard! Maybe you should check the premise of your beliefs.

 

quote me saying that..... come on i thought you were better then this.

 

You just claimed it as one of the reasons you don't believe the official story. Clearly if the only way a tower can collapse is if a plane hits it and no plane hit it, then by all means you are completely justified in not believing the official story. If, however, it is possible for a building to collapse without a plane hitting it, then your entire premise is fatally flawed.

 

The structure of your sentence implies that being hit by a plane was necessary to cause a collapse.

If you understand the English language anyway.