911 World Trade Center Tower "Collapse", a new "Demolition" Euphemism!

This coming from the same moron who posted a video of a collapsing building that was clearly cgi from a movie. How can you even take yourself seriously clown?

 

You are projecting, trougher.

 

yes yes we all know, left is right, black is white and truthers are troughers in the fertile imaginings of troughers.

The comedy continues.

 

now now such vile hatred toward the academics.

yes because mystery shadows are not planes.



regardless who wants to believe they are and they certainly do not fly through buildings. I mean in real ife of course. LOL

But then you have the trougher cartoon crowd



they insist on turning the worst event since pearl into a comedy.

 

Why do you do that, trougher? You just confirmed you are one by posting a cartoon.

No planes flew through buildings on 9/11: they crashed into them. In reality.

 

what a dumb question to ask someone as top shelf intelligent as myself.

the sky has no color what so ever.

 

By top shelf, clearly you're referring to something unreachable.

 

yes because mystery shadows are not planes.



regardless who wants to believe they are and they certainly do not fly through buildings. I mean in real ife of course. LOL

But then you have the trougher cartoon crowd



they insist on turning the worst event since pearl into a comedy.

nope the roadrunner position is a trougher position that they used to prove a plane went into the wtc.

So you now agree its loonacy for planes to fly through buildings too huh?
Good to see you are starting to come around?


Oh, say can you see by the dawn's early light
What so proudly we hailed at the twilight's last gleaming?
Whose broad stripes and bright stars thru the perilous fight,
O'er the ramparts we watched were so gallantly streaming?

And the rocket's white glare, columns bursting in air,






so why do you continue to quote the trougher mantra?

 

for troughers yeh, sadly, that is true proving once again public education sukx

 

It's cute that koko actually thinks he's "helping" his argument by posting more. The first rule of holes is clearly in play here.

 

yeh I did and showed how foolish the question is in the first place.

- - - Updated - - -

Oh come on, I am just having a little fun, on the side, showing how frivolous and ludicrous troughers are. Like taking candy from a babe, with both brains tied behind my back

 

You definitely showed something foolish.

- - - Updated - - -

I agree it's fun, just not in the way you appear to believe it is.

 

plural acting, some-things, more like many things.

So hows those ad hominem attacks working for ya in the face of all the HARD evidence that shows how troughers are lying on their face?

 

I'll let you know the moment you provide some hard evidence or anything in any thread. Low-res gifs to prop up your trolling is all we have so far.

 

Well then, describe what "hard evidence" is. Lets see what you know.

yeh well they are government and media pics, asking me to provide what does not exist is a bit loony dont you think? They are the same pics the government used and media used, so please tell me what you think I should provide?

 

Here's a simple rule of thumb for one to get a conversation started on whether something is hard evidence or not: it's not a low res gif, especially one with the roadrunner in it.

Glad I could clear that up for you.

 

so then the government has no hard evidence, thanks for clearing that up!

 

To repeat:

context is important

 

repeat:

your dodging as usual is precisely why people no longer pay attention to you and your ilk and why truthers are flushing the official fantasy right down the crapper where it belongs.

​

 

Non of our claims have ever been discredited in court, and nobody, so far, has taken any of your side's to court and not gotten laughed out of the room.

 

huh?

what claims?

case numbers please?

 

The only person who has taken any 9/11 twoof to court was whacky old Judy and she got a bill for the court expenses and a warning not to bother the grownups any more.

 

case number?

 

You would have to ask whacky old Judy.

 

http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html

From her own web site.