This is great! What more do these people need? So much for crush down propaganda and hooray for truthers youve done it again! [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yb-1O2sMWok"]BIG BADDADDAAADDDDA BOOOOMA[/ame] [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsePUn5-88c"]BAZANT CRUSH DOWN DEMONSTRATION!!![/ame] Wow all that weight and plonk! collapse fail! How about that huh? [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CARLAvm9T0"]BAZANT IS AN IDIOT[/ame]
Yeah. Those buildings are so comparable. A 110 story building with almost an acre of floorspace per floor fully loaded vs. a stripped out structure. Nice one Koko. Think it will actually convince anyone of anything?
well they will get smart and use planes next time! with lots of people in them! with raith suicide bombers!
Please forgive me, I must have missed it. Just what does your post show that the truthers did again that you are cheering about? Were the truthers in charge of setting up those buildings for controlled demolition? Or were those comical collapses your analogy of the various truther theories and the comical way they have collapsed as well?
Well, I suppose it would be if it actually did. But all it really does is make truthers look even crazier -- as if that's possible. Honestly koko, where do you come up with this stuff?
you need to watch these videos man This is great! What more do these people need? So much for crush down propaganda and hooray for truthers youve done it again! [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yb-1O2sMWok"]BIG BADDADDAAADDDDA BOOOOMA[/ame] [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsePUn5-88c"]BAZANT CRUSH DOWN DEMONSTRATION!!![/ame] Wow all that weight and plonk! collapse fail! How about that huh?[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CARLAvm9T0"]BAZANT IS AN IDIOT[/ame]
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yb-1O2sMWok"]BIG STEEL BUILDING BOUNCES LIKE BALL!!![/ame] This is sooooo funny! Watch this steel building bounce after demolition takes out 4 bottom floors! It defies physics too and freakin tips over. no fun at all! but what IS fun is the date! Jun 2001
I did watch them koko. As amusing as they are, they aren't relevant at all to 9/11. But if you think they are, why don't you forward them to the proper authorities so that the "real" perpetrators of the WTC collapse can be brought to justice? Isn't that the ultimate goal? To make sure the guilty parties are brought to justice? I mean it's been 10 years. The proper authorities must have not seen these incriminating YouTube videos so you should help them out by dropping this bombshell in their laps. It would be quite a feather in your cap to single-handedly prove what no one else has been able to prove for 10 years now, don't you think?
so your suggestion is that we submit a request for what amounts to Al Capone to somehow fix or remedy their own corruption? There are lots of things that the authorities do not see by design. Of course they may have coincidentally had their back turned toward it when it accidentally slid in the garbage can. anyone in particular you would recommend?
I still want to know how a self proclaimed expert in physics like Koko can possibly believe that all buildings should react exactly the same regardless of construction, materials, size, circumstances, etc. Doesn't it strike anyone as odd that a self professed mental giant can make such an obvious and childish mistake? Even on Sesame Street you can learn that differences in objects and circumstances can lead to different results.
Julian Assange? Political enemies of the perps maybe? This close to an election year I'm sure someone would want to make political hay by unmasking the "real" perps behind 9/11? Of course you would need some actual credible evidence. Not just speculation and silly animations.
It was proven a long time ago. You people just won't recognize it. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ"]9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out, Full-length, Pre-Release-v1.3; Low-Res. - YouTube[/ame] This is the tactic you seem to be using. http://tvnewslies.org/tvnl/index.ph...e-the-q911-conspiracy-theory-de-bunkersq.html (excerpt) ----------------------------------- What the 9/11 truth community wants is direct answers to their questions. Myth huggers are not qualified to answer these questions but they are more than qualified to confuse people into thinking that the questions have been answered. They have not. ----------------------------------- Here's another good one in case anyone hasn't seen it. http://tvnewslies.org/tvnl/index.ph...se-you-dont-know-the-official-911-story-.html More here... http://able2know.org/topic/177268-1#post-4782975
and the official version is what? Mucho speculation and no evidence. In fact completely ill-interpreted evidence and force fit models. LOL
Wow! Look at koko stepping all over himself! First he says no evidence. Then, IN THE VERY NEXT SENTENCE he says the evidence was "ill-interpreted". I love it when truthers can't even get out of their own way and end up exposing their own lies in the same post. Thanks for the laughs, Koko!
In the case of your post, it's the point where you apparently change your mind and contradict yourself. (You seem to have "difficultties" with your spelling, also.)
A period is also what you should have used after the word period. Instead you chose to use a comma without a conjunction in an attempt to join two independent clauses. I know what that's called. Do you know what that's called?
