911 WTC nukes tests (Was thermate used to cover up nukes?)

I cant think of a way to put the moon in your pocket either, but then I am not the lyin assed gubafia either.

 

No,you're apparently your own lying a**

 

I cant think of a way to put the moon in your pocket either, but then I am not the lyin assed gubafia either.

the prosecution rests.

 

*ahem* the 'prosecution' still needs to present it's case,Perry Mason.

 

I haven't been on here in six months and I see koko has went from nano thermite to mini nukes...lol. That is funny stuff there.

 

I didn't ask you to think of a way to put the moon in my pocket. You said that you could think of a way to vaporize steel without a change in heat.

You lied.

It's that simple.

 

obviously you did not understand how I meant it even though I explained it ad nauseum but that is nothing noew out here. nothing to see here moving on

 

What I understood is that you have no idea what you are talking about.

I was correct in that assessment.

If I wasn't correct you would have proven me wrong by now.

You haven't.

You don't know what you're talking about and now you're floundering around trying to cover your lies.

 

well debunker understanding or in this case the lack thereof is what I have said is the problem all along and why I continue to request that debunkers go to school and take a nice physics course.

Most of this is high school level, nothing to complicated.

 

You wouldn't know.

I've already proven that.

You said you knew something about Newton's theory of gravity that even Newton himself didn't know. You lied.

You said you knew how to vaporize steel without a change in heat. You lied.

You said you knew about micro nukes that didn't explode, use fission or fusion, release EMP or radiation. You lied.

All these things you say you know about. They are lies. They are easily proven lies.

The biggest clue that they are lies? Not once have you backed up your claims once I called you on your BS. Not once. Instead it's this crap.

With that, I'm done. You're on ignore.

 

never proved a thing, never lied, only in your wildest imagination.

I love it when people cannot control themselves and put me on iggy! LMAO

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNQRfBAzSzo"]Queen - Another One Bites The Dust - YouTube[/ame]

 

Six months and you're still stuck on the "official" BS story? I guess the work is too hard.

 

No one suspects that about you though koko.

 

wel like all these other flunkies that is crap and creating strawmen. I never went from thermate to nukes.

typical misrepresentations of the flunkies since they have no port in this storm to turn to.

 

You gotta admit that the shills are well trained in disinformation tactics. The average stupid person doesn't stand a chance.

 

RWF if you bothered to read the title of the thread you'd figure out where the source of the disinformation was.

Koko went from thermate to nukes right there in his title. It didn't take a few months. It took a few minutes.

 

And you can't even clearly state WHY it's a 'BS story'..EVER

 

No they sure dont. Like I knew they would,the shills have invaded here in full force to try and derail 9/11 discussions.

 

I fail to see how asking you to back up your ludicrous claims is 'derailing the discussion',hell,I thought that WAS part of it.

 

Well, to be fair, the agenda DOES call for it..:/

 

explain for us how the 2 interact when used in combination.

 

because instead of stating the facts that it was a demolition they instead put up the charts and data that only physicists and demolition experts would know it was a demolition effectively lying by omission to the public at large.

Does not get any clearer than that.

 

Oh please....

 

LOL... So because they explained it in detailed, scientific terms, using specific data, instead of on the first-grade-level necessary for 9/11 deniers to understand it, that means they're lying?

That is really (*)(*)(*)(*)ing hysterical. I mean, come on dude... Have you no shame? Really. How can you not be embarrassed to say something so illogical and obviously silly?

Especially after you and the other Deniers here and elsewhere have consistently accused the government of hiding or covering up the real data. Now, when confronted with the fact that they haven't been doing so, you reverse course and say that, in fact, they have laid out the real data, but they are covering something up by not dumbing it down enough for you to wrap your head around it?

 

Well then I guess I should be happy to see you finally admit they were demolished.

rough day in court huh.