911 WTC World Trade Towers, Did Thermate do This?

Just out of curiosity, is evidence presented by the United States required to have the same validation criteria for you?

 

Can you tell me where I claimed you did?

 

You would think that he would know what people in his own movement are saying.

 

Yeh its as hard to believe as the Japs bombing pearl harbor eh!

where do you guys dig that crazy crap up anyway?

 

official ganstas still trying to rewrite the rules of grammar too I see.

 

great fairy tale there,AGAIN you cant get around the facts they said lets PULL it when they brought down the buildings and nice doge calling the firemen IT.Give it up dude before you embarrass yourself any further.

 

dude you need to read debunking the 9/11 debunking,answer to popular mechanics and other defenders of the official conspiracy theory.nobody has ever been able to debunk that book and it has overwhelming evidence explosives brought the towers down,again if you were familiar with barrry jennings testimony you would know explosives were used.you wont read the book though,nobody on the net ever does,they only see what they want to see so I know i am wasting my time with you on this.

 

yep sure is.

 

its always fun watching you take the OCTA'S to school.

 

great rebuttal because yeah,its about as unbeliveable as the japs bombing pearl harbour as well.lol.

 

And you have no answer to the points I made, s you petulanly whine 'nuh-uh!' and then insult me

 

All we ever hear from ganstas is magic physics and now shell game grammar.

 

Im gonna help drive the point home...
Heres a GREAT Documentary that describes in detail with the best quality video that 2001 had to offer, Why the WTC 1, 2, 7 buildings came down like a Controlled Demo...

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyiwOJ2pnGg&feature=related"]LOOSE CHANGE[/ame]

You government believers / Paid lobbyists cannot keep playing the PSIOPS game...


You are losing the Information War...

 

From the creator of "Loose Change":

Even the creator/ director has backed off of this video.

 

like any investigation conclusions are drawn as information comes in.


nist backed off several conclusions so what?

You seem to think that the gubafia after keeping information from the people that the people should perform to higher standards than the gubafia who has all the information at their finger tips. after all they created it.

something very wrong with that pictuer

 

Saw a TV show recently that disproved the thermate theory to a large extent. It concentrated burning thermate of the same caliber as the stuff conceived by the truthers on a concrete or steel or whatever beam used to support the trade center. After it burned out, all it did was turn the column black.

The same show also discredited the theory that a missile hit the Pentagon (again to a large extent, nothing is ever for sure of course) by making a small scale plane that smashed through sheets of wood. It showed that even though the plane hit with the wings it still made a missile shaped impact on the boards, so it probably was not a missile.

And come on truthers, use some sense. A high speed missile? At the CENTRAL DEFENSE BUILDING by our OWN government? Please. People observed the plane before impact. And the twin towers? Why don't you focus on the war or something instead of the attacks. Even if Al Queda did not do it, they still claimed responsibility. Numerous interviews with ex-Al Queda members revealed the plot was planned for a long time. I remember watching one in which the terrorist admitted that Osama was "surprised" with the success they had. So even if they did not do it, they had every intention, so they are still God (*)(*)(*)(*) terrorists.

 

OMG totally unthinkable!

Just like operation northwoods aint that right.


[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQ-cMQha8wo"]CIA, Operation Northwoods, 9 11 - YouTube[/ame]

 

Random YouTube speculation is not evidence of controlled demolition via death beams from space.

 

thats the best you can come up with LMAO

 

It's a fact.

The video posted is unsubstantiated drivel.

 

Plus northwoods was only a proposal, that was rejected.

Shoot, the governments probably got wilder ones than that tucked away.

 

What is an "OCTA"?

Loose Change has more holes in it than a block of Swiss cheese.

Watch this video and tell me if you still think Avery has any clue as to what he is talking about.

[ame="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3214024953129565561&ei=zjNySe-6Bouk-wGi06TkCw&q=Screw+Loose+Change+Movie&hl=en"]Screw Loose Change - Not Freakin' Again edition[/ame]

 

You think explosives destroyed the WTC. Explosives which firefighters would have seen and come into contact with during their rescue attempts. Plus the aforementioned point about Silverstein, which was already brought to your attention.

 

well then you wont have ANY problems proving it will you LMAO

 

Wow thats pretty good!

Prove they would have "seen" them. Prove they did not see them. Prove they did not come into contact with them.