A brief analysis of WTC 1 : Initial catastrophic failure.

Discussion in '9/11' started by Perilica grad Ameriku, Dec 2, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,834
    Likes Received:
    369
    Trophy Points:
    83

    you better make sure you arent drinking anything when you read their interpretation of what a "break away base" is LOL

    Long story short these experts out here dont know the difference between a breakaway base and breakaway pole. LOL

    - - - Updated - - -

    just in case the planes want to take a nice sunday drive down the street
     
  2. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,834
    Likes Received:
    369
    Trophy Points:
    83
    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]

    Yeh but OSHuggers blindly regurgitate all this crap from dablunder sites and simply DONT GET IT! LMAO
     
  3. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :roflol:
     
  4. Wizard From Oz

    Wizard From Oz Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
    Messages:
    9,682
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Because you are not capable of understanding a concept - Does not make the concept invalid, it just highlights your ignorance

    - - - Updated - - -

    So you didn't even bother to open the second link huh? I suppose I just expect too much from truthers sometimes
     
  5. Wizard From Oz

    Wizard From Oz Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
    Messages:
    9,682
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So Wikipedia is now a dablunder site huh? You should seek some serious help
     
  6. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,834
    Likes Received:
    369
    Trophy Points:
    83
    so you think the pentagon is an airport???????? really?
     
  7. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wikipedia is not a research tool. If you have proof, absolute proof, of your claim I want to read it. Post it when you get it.
     
  8. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,834
    Likes Received:
    369
    Trophy Points:
    83
    yeh I have CORRECTED many mistakes they made.

    - - - Updated - - -

    someone said they are starting to accpet that crap for research in some of the lower end schools, the world is really going to hell in a hand basket.
     
  9. Wizard From Oz

    Wizard From Oz Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
    Messages:
    9,682
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So you dont know the Pentagon is right next door to Ronald Reagan airport? How much research on the subject have you actually done?

    - - - Updated - - -

    Yet a crappy gif is?
     
  10. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There are spaces in the link that break it. Try again.
     
  11. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    cjnews went to that college. :lol:

    That is what he said. I couldn't believe any respectable college would accept wikipedia articles for research. Now I know why the truth debunkers don't understand Newton's laws of motion. :lol:
     
  12. holston

    holston Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,591
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
    They HAVE done a lot of research, as you well know!
    The media suppress it as much as the Hasbara attempt to ridicule and suppress it.

    As I said, even absolute proof will not suffice to get a murderer to confess to murder.

    Their persistent denials are intended to create the least doubt in the minds of the gullible in the hopes that they will let the matter slide.

    More importantly, a true investigation requires subpoena power, something else which I am sure you are aware of.
    You are also dishonest for not admitting it.


    What you are asking for of the corrupt ZOGist judicial system is like asking Kim Jong Un to resign or requesting that the Green River killer, or the Hillside Strangler to turn themselves in.
     
  13. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Actually what they are asking for is evidence which the twoofers never provide.
     
  14. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    NIST committed fraud in the WTC report. That is solid evidence.
     
  15. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You have consistently failed to provide any evidence that they commited fraud.

    So it is only your empty claim which is not solid evidence
     
  16. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, they didn't. Just another lie from the 'truther' handbook.
     
  17. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You have failed to read the official documents. Fraud is documented in the official NIST report.
     
  18. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No I have not.

    The official documents prove no such fraud you are lying.

    You can provide no such evidence of such a fraud.
     
  19. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Just so you know... Shyam Sunder might want to buy land in Uruguay. It is my understanding that George Bush has already done so. Uruguay does not have an extradition agreement with the U.S.

    - - - Updated - - -

    The NIST report is documentation of fraud.
     
  20. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Empty threats. You're pathetic.
     
  21. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You are lying.

    The NIST report does not document any fraud or you would have provided the evidence when asked long ago.

    You fail to do so because it does not exist
     
  22. holston

    holston Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,591
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
    [video=youtube;sFLC96wHx8k]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFLC96wHx8k[/video]
     
  23. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The NIST report is a lie. Do you have access to Google? The NIST report is readily available for anyone and it is a fraudulent report.
     
  24. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Just because you assert it does not make it so.

    You have been repeatedly asked to provide evidence and you cannot because you are lying.
     
  25. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No,it's NOT.....
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page