Discussion in '9/11' started by Perilica grad Ameriku, Dec 2, 2013.
and you can believe he never read it! LMAO
Probably did actually which is why he knows it is not fraudulent.
thats what your talking about!
this is one that he was talking about
here is a crystal clear one of the same corner knuckle
heres a better one.
Keep 'em comin'. Make the lazy blackguards earn their pay.
These are opinions not evidence
And what are YOUR opinions worth.
So far you've said essentially nothing except to let us know you are just another scoffing defender of the Kosher status quo.
Yet another puerile gif that is exactly short enough not to show the truth
Oh you want to see it sit there for the prior 6 months?
Im sure its quite painful when OSH'rs see their erroneous beliefs run right over like a freight train, but then I keep telling them to give up the dablunder sites and think for themselves.
I stated no opinion I asked for evidence.
No one offers any.
..something you wouldn't recognize if it bit you.
- - - Updated - - -
Are you blind or stupid or just another Hasbarat?
and the only thing that can break core columns are 2 engines, landing gear and nose gear.
doesnt take a whole lot to cipher that not much damage will be done.
However these dablunder sites have the OSHuggers all drama'a up as if it were game of bowling and every alleged plane impact yields a steeeeeeeeeeeerike!
10 seconds would be enough - But then what is the point, you have not even done enough research to know the communication tower was not connected to the core. But used a truss system anchored at the 107th floor to the top hat system
Its not intended to show the collapse, its intended to show the core went first, it does that very well. there are plenty of videos on bootube if you want to see the whole collapse.
It does not show the core at all.
So why did you cut it before the rotation appeared more obvious. How does it prove the core collapsed first if the communication tower was not attached to the core? You did know that didn't you. Just like you know where Ronald Reagan Airport was
nice noob post
Yes and 100% accurate
This coming from a person whose understanding of Newton's Laws would have you believe that the planes should have bounced off the buildings and fallen to the ground. Bravo genius.
you mean they shouldnt have?
got the sectional ciperin to make your case?
Why are you avoiding my question about the communication tower?
no, 100% noob. in other words laughable because you hung yourself with that post. sorry. you need to start from the beginning and do some basic research.
Yes why dont you - Have you found Ronald Reagan Airport yet or what the communication tower was attached too?
Separate names with a comma.