A fake plane was added for south tower explosion

If there really were videos of an airplane crash, then someone would claim the $100,000.

$100,000 9/11 Airplane Video Challenge.

 

Perhaps the "no planers" on this very board should follow the same critereon as the requirements to claim the hundred grand.

One way street much?

 

This is what I got for the main part of each hole. There were 5 broken beams for tower 2 and 15 for 1. The width of these holes would approximately be 17 and 52 feet. I counted 57 beams, not including the corners. I rounded it to 60 beams. 15/60=0.25x208=52 feet. The point is simple; Whatever hit T2 was smaller or maybe more probable, T1 was rigged with more sophisticated explosives.

 

What "beams" are you talking about?

 

If you're asking to me to explain most every thing about 911, no individual could take on that immense task. I focused on the easiest aspect of 911 because of all the available news footage showing fake planes on different flight paths and an orb that really came from the northwest that was called a plane.

I can't explain how the orb flew because it had no apparent characteristics of any known aircraft which leads to some exotic, very slowing moving drone. Notice the building circled below that is clearly north and west of the towers. The circled orb took a long 15 seconds before tower 2 exploded. It was moving slow and there was a witness who laughed at that very fact.

 

Once again,there was NO 'orb' and tower 2 collapsed,it din't 'explode'

 

That's a good question which people in aviation have tackled. Something about the impossibility of a plane going 500 mph a thousand feet above ground. The silly idea that dumb arabs did this, whose instructers said were basic dummies. It goes on and on but my work is simple just like I did with jfk. I focused on tower 2 because of so many cameras filming after T1.

Whether I've proven beyond all doubt that no aircraft impacted the south tower is in question, but I have raised a ton of reasonable doubt. I have thoroughly debunked the divebomb footage and the cgi from the west. That leaves one possibility of the low south to north path which was filmed from the east and west. The orb cannot be excluded because it appears in 4 live clips and was referred to as flight 175.

The government has only one possible flight path that was most likely not visible from the north view, which is good for denialists. But you still have the other flight paths which are very different with media reptiles giving credibility to the orb by calling it the plane. A very big mess (it would be) with the orb being involved, whether it was some guidance device or the sole object that impacted the south tower. The divebomber is 13 seconds before impact and is behind, south of the towers. The orb in the all-important cbs footage is 15 seconds before explosion and is northwest of the towers, flying southeast over the Hudson. The small buidling circled provides conclusive proof of the orb's diametric flight path to that of UA.

 

There is NOTHING impossible abot flying 500 mph at 1000 feet

Most of the hijackers were college educated and the pilots all had flight certificates and training on passenger jet simulators,and as for being called 'dummies', all of them had the skills to fly the planes once taken over in flightand crash them.


zThere WERE767's and they DID crash into the towers...there was NO 'orb'

 

I wonder if those "dumb Arabs" could spell 'instructor'.

But keep using the phrase, it really props up your credibility.

 

There is NOTHING possible about flying 500 mph at 1000 feet.

Most of the hijackers were idiots and 'dummies', none of them had the skills to fly a plane if they hijacked one.


and they DID not crash into the towers...there was NO 'Plane'.

 

You haven't an ounce of credibility with nothing to prove but posting in a thread that's made its point beyond refute.

 

The plane was not flown by poorly trained Arabs on a mission from Osama bin Laden because they “hate our freedoms”.

Quotes from Flight Instructors:

Mohammed Atta: “His attention span was zero.”
Khalid Al-Mihdhar: “We didn’t kick him out, but he didn’t live up to our standards.”
Marwan Al-Shehhi: “He was dropped because of his limited English and incompetence at the controls.”
Salem Al-Hazmi: “We advised him to quit after two lessons.”
Hani Hanjour: “His English was horrible, and his mechanical skills were even worse. It was like he had hardly even ever driven a car. I’m still to this day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon. He could not fly at all.”

9/11 Anomalies

 

You find it amazing that licensed pilots could crash a plane into a building?

 

Another orb identified flying straight east to west behind the towers at 9:10. It appears to be rising in altitude.LOL


[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dNLy_vJBlU&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=102&feature=plpp_video"]WCBS 9/11 9:10 - 9:20 - YouTube[/ame]

 

Helicopters...<eyeroll>

 

Psy-Opera seems quite thorough about no-planes, yet does not mention "orbs" or contradictions in flight path. Seems that contradictory flight paths would be a very amateurish mistake, no?

 

Another orb flying straight east to west behind the towers at 9:10. It appears to be rising in altitude.LOL It took about three seconds for it to move across tower 2. 208 feet/3=70x60seconds=4200feet per minute. 4200x60minutes=252000 feet per hour/5280=48mph. This orb was moving very similar to the orb that exploded the south tower. IT WAS MOVING VERY SLOW!



[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dNLy_vJBlU&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=102&feature=plpp_video"]WCBS 9/11 9:10 - 9:20 - YouTube[/ame]

 

you say the 'orb'(helicopter) is going behind the tower, then you say it's moving in front...


Make up your mind

 

I never said it was a helicopter but Wb11 said it might be a police chopper. The orb behind the towers is different from the orb seen right before tower 2 exploded.

 

Not really. It was/is simply impossible to cover up something of 911's magnitude.

 

Are you unable to answer any of these questions 7Forever?

 

UA 175 cannot be proven because it didn't show up in 4 live broadcasts. An orb came from the northwest moving very slowly over the Hudson River. Here is Chopper 4 NBC. This footage ran for over 2 minutes before the orb drops from right/northwest of the towers. This orb was eventually called the 'plane'. That proves all by itself that no plane impacted the south tower. Watch very close to above and right of T1 for the orb, which casts its own shadow behind the buildings before it impacts the southeast corner of T2.



[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_caQ9ZsGycY&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=95&feature=plpp_video"]9/11 footage Chopper 4 HQ - YouTube[/ame]

 

I've given you three chances to answer the questions I asked you. There's no longer any reason to think you missed them. The only thing I can do is assume you are not able to answer these questions.

Someone who purports to be able to detect CGI on live film should be able to answer these questions.

 

There are no 'orbs', all helicopters...

 

The orb/bomb was not triggered upon impact, it moved through the tower (on the east side) and showed its first fire between the south and northeast corners. The huge fireball appears on the (opposite side of impact) northeast corner. This is in direct contrast with Tower 1 that produced a huge explosion at the point of impact on its northeast corner.