A fake plane was added for south tower explosion

Discussion in '9/11' started by 7forever, Sep 16, 2011.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    No one has to come forward or admit anything. It was caught in 4 live broadcasts.
     
  2. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I focused on the easiest aspect of 911 because of all the available news footage showing fake planes on different flight paths and an orb that really came from the northwest that was called a plane.

    I can't explain how the orb flew because it had no apparent characteristics of any known aircraft which leads to some exotic, very slowing moving drone. Notice the building circled below that is clearly north and west of the towers. The circled orb took a long 10-15 seconds before tower 2 exploded. It was moving slow and there was a witness who laughed at that very fact. The third pic is NY1. I circled the Newark side which the orb apparently flew over and many witnesses mentioned something coming in low from over west. One man said it may have come from Newark Airport.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  3. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why are you circling tops of buildings?...callng those 'orbs' as well?
     
  4. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    How far away from the Towers were those 4 live broadcasts filmed?
     
  5. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Knock yourself out. As reported by the female reporter in Chopper 4, they were around 5 miles north of the towers when the orb was captured coming from over west.
    http://www.911conspiracy.tv/2nd_hit.html

    WB11 (WPIX-TV) Metrocam YouTube 1, 2, & 3

    Shot from the Empire State Building, like NY1 above, but from a different camera. It could be guessed that WB11 (now "WPIX Home of the CW") cropped the NY1 wide shot to create a zoomed view with better aesthetic balance... but no. Recently (July 2009) YougeneDebs used trig to discover the WB11 view "seems to be on the western half of the ESB at about the 88th storey. Notice the Staten Island shore line and structures there behind One Liberty Plaza, the old U.S. Steel building, the black building just to the left of center-frame for an estimate of the height of the perspective." The NY1 camera location is described above.

    GM Building

    This is the 3rd angle WCBS used on 9/11 to show the plane... all in 3 minutes. Here the plane passes the distance between the Empire State Building and the WTC in two successive playbacks (9:04 and 9:05). The full approach of "Flight 175" is shown from this angle later at 9:17 (and 9:22, abbreviated). That is, the tape starts from pauseĀ— with the plane in a circle.

    The camera location: General Motors Building, aka FAO Schwartz, E 58th St at Madison Ave... 215 meters tall on ground elevated at 48 feet above sea level Lat 40.763595 Lon -73.972781 (Thanks, YougeneDebs)

    Every distance would have produced a ledgible image of a 767 for either tower but no image has ever surfaced. The north tower blob compared to a decent fake of UA 175 compared to a real boeing 767. Flight 11 and 175 were both supposed to be 767's.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  6. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    In other news....
     
  7. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Bart, that's why you don't cherry pick any vids because they prove no planes.
    The better fakes show a black image with no windows, not a 767.
    The ones I use show no plane, but an orb, or fake planes.

    Thank you for revealing how ridiculous and defeated government kooks always will be.

    Generally, you don't pick any evidence because it all points to fakery and no planes.
     
  8. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Moving right along....
     
  9. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Still can't get past the thousands,perhaps millions of eyewitnesses who saw real planes hit the towers,
    Nor can you explain away the engine wreckage that ended up in the Marriott pool,the debris on adjacent buildings around the towers as well as down on street level.

    In short,your 'fake CGI plane' nonsense, has been found lacking
     
  10. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    None of that what you mention is even on the table until real planes can be established and flight 175 has been destroyed.
     
  11. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It was destroyed when it was hijacked by five al-Qaeda terrorists and deliberately crashed into the South Tower of the World Trade Center in New York City, in front of millions of eyewitnesses.
     
  12. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    LOL. 5 miles away, you say? :mrgreen:

    No wonder the towers look like they have no windows and the plane looks like a blob. Er, excuse me, an orb. :)
     
  13. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    It was impacted by a small object which was later called a plane. Not a single eyewitness saw a real plane. They saw computer images on TV.
     
  14. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    The buildings were perfectly clear and no plane showed up in 4 live broadcasts. The chopper 4 lady and the people in the studio failed to see the orb, and when it was pointed out they called it a plane which of course it was not. Lucky for you, you'll never be tasked with proving a negative, that a twin engine jet could show up as a small circular object.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  15. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    The fact that media reptiles called an orb a 767 on 911 is beyond refute. They gave it credibility by acknowledging that it was responsible for T2's explosion. It needed to be ignored and written off as a chopper or artifact but wasn't, because humans are incapable of covering almost anything up.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  16. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I am hoping to get a job as "parts spreader" during the next attack.
     
  17. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sorry sport, but I doubt the people who watched the plane hit with their own eyes thought it was CGI
     
  18. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why do you respond to posters on different boards here?
     
  19. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,670
    Likes Received:
    3,709
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If he answers that one ask why doesn't he respond to the posters that post on this board?
     
  20. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
  21. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,670
    Likes Received:
    3,709
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Maybe he's responding to my posts somewhere else?
     
  22. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    For some reason ,he posts to ME......Arent I just the lucky one?
     
  23. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Because it illustrates how clearly facts cannot be challenged. Shoot the messenger and never delve into details, just accept the official lies.
     
  24. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    The burden of proof is on you, the accuser which is anyone saying that real planes flew into the towers. I posted 4 live broadcasts, (three of which were aired live in NY) that show an orb going behind the towers before T2 exploded. That orb was not seen by some, intitally and others said it could be a chopper. The orb was not a chopper or plane which thoroughly debunks the myth that UA 175 was involved in the second tower. You are defeated, so you ask me questions instead of challenging the numerous points of evidence that proves no plane impacted the south tower.
     
  25. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh, that surely isn't what it illustrates to ME...
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page