A Simple Question for Those Are Still Opposed to Same Sex Marriage

I, of course, was referring to what they "had" at the time of adoption, not at the time of their birth.

 

You support gay adoptions. So what moral restrictions would the gay people have to have to adopt?

Surely you would not forbid an transexaul or transbeastial person from adopting?

 

Questions don't become strawman arguments, just because you don't want to answer.

 

Some folks just have a pathological urge to control the lives of others, and nowhere has that been more evident than in the "land of the fwee".

 

I'll suport you no matter what he says, go ahead.

 

The same as straight people..You seem to be obsessed with sexual acts. Did your parents have sex in front of you? What parents do in private is none of your business or mine. How people make love is personal and has nothing to do with parenting. I would have no problem with a transsexual adopting

 

No, they become silly. ...and show bigotry

 

But you would like crazy people to adopt? At what age, pray tell, should a child be allowed to have gender reassignment surgery?

 

I would be opposed to any crazy people adopting. What does that have to do with gay parents? Most people who are crazy are nice heterosexuals like I assume you are
So far you have reduced gay people to sexual acts and mental illness. I wonder what your problem is

 

Transgenders are mentally ill. Most are depressed. Treating a depression with extreme surgery is a poor option.
https://www.cnsnews.com/news/articl...atrist-transgender-mental-disorder-sex-change

DNA determines one's sex. Nothing else.

 

DNA also has links to sexual preference and mental illness.

 

There is no "gay gene." It is more likely there are thousands of genes that influence personality, intelligence and behavior.

 

Unless their parents die they have parents.

 

Correct, just like there is no "straight gene". I wish more of the anti-gay people understood this.

 

Actually it does, although to what degree varies by state. For example, a step parent and step child, even as both being adults, would trigger incest laws in some states if they started a sexual relationship. Now I do agree that most if not all states would not override a bio parent's rights for that of a step parents, at least not without some other type of legal document.

 

So are you suggesting a minimum of 6 parents here?

Muslims and Fundamentalist Mormons are not the only ones with poly families.

 

I'm saying that the traditional nuclear family is going to be the very best environment for any child to grow up in.

Look at all the poly families in Syrian, Yemen and Iraq---what a mess.

 

What do the new ‘gay genes’ tell us about sexual orientation?

 

I give up. What do "the new gay genes" tell us about sexual orientation? Are they related to the straight genes?

 

It's in the article

 

Please cite the specific paragraph in which you are addressing. All I read was that there were genes which give clues to sexual preference.

 

Yes...that's all I'm saying.

 

Closest they can come is some hormonal imbalance in the womb, which isn't genetic nor can it overwhelm environmental influence. The fact is homosexual fetishism in a mental illness, that's all, and only idiots, and of course all the other mentally ill fetishists, want to normalize mental illnesses and encourage their proliferation instead of preventing them.

 

Right,
You are confused with Manga and
Furry folks that have fantasies over dolls and art and blur the distinction between fantasy and reality, the true authorities are not the purveyors of abstract progressive pop psychology, but actual information from reliable sources, the D.S.M. and mental health textbooks.
The Inquireor is not a reliable source of information and neither is most quoted articles or blogs.

 

lol sorry but your claims that the DSM and 'mental health textbooks' are 'reliable sources' are laughable nonsense. Both are subjected to blatant PC pressure and openly biased. And then we have the openly homosexual researchers who almost always cite each other most of the time, and of course last but not last the extremely amateurish and outright lame methodologies used in most of their 'studies'. They are nothing but hacks for political agendas, not scientists, and openly so.

The 'pop psychology' is entirely on the part of you assorted neurotic deviants.