Discussion in 'Political Science' started by Ming the Merciless, Nov 1, 2018.
Seriously, are you more then twelve ?
Yes, that's why I ask adult questions and don't have to resort to 12 year old level insults.
Go ahead and try again.
And you didn’t notice the question mark ? Do you need vocabulary lesson ?
Oh look. Can't actually discuss the topic and trying insults.
Not looking real good for you being right about anything today.
Why do you keep claiming that you know whether or not every dead body you find IS a murdered by your suspect ? You have some kind of magic power.
Or does due process only apply to conservatives and not Hillary ?
No. I'll explain for you.
You see, when a body is found, they determine if it was natural causes, an accident, a suicide, or a homicide.
They're pretty smart that way.
That means someone committed a crime if it's a homicide that wasn't justifiable.
Just like when you find classified material on a non-classified network.
You might not know who put it there, but a crime has been committed regardless.
Any other simple concepts I can help you with?
Who are they ?
oh, a crime has been committed ? No, charges of a crime have been filed. You're delusional. And, you’re changing your story. It’s no longer murder according to you. You must have had someone read it to you. . It’s homicide.
MURDER IS NEVER DETERMINED BEFORE DUE PROCESS.
CHARGES OF MURDER, ( murder is a conviction) is brought out by the DA. It’s due process that determines the actual charges.
Homicide is either murder, manslaughter or justifiable homicide.
None of these is determined until after due process.
Claiming that murder is determined before due process was, is and will be every time you make the claim, wrong.
No one is guilty of a crime until due process , if no one is guilty, THERE IS NO CRIME. THERE IS A COMPLAINT and charges of a crime which are filed before litigation.
You need to do more reading.
Sure, the classified info jumped onto the server. Maybe it was seeking asylum.
Please, post more. I'm certainly enjoying watching the attempt to present a cogent argument.
They're the ones that committed a crime.
So “they” are the ones who committed the crime ?
I mean you wouldn't suggest that if someone was murdered a crime wasn't committed until someone was convicted.
That would just be too hilarious for me to take.
"We think the bank was robbed, but we won't know for sure until we convict someone".
Tell me more.
We’ve established you don’t know what homicide entails and that murder doesn’t even appear as a choice on the police and autopsy report. No one is mudered until the charge has been filed by the DA for murder and a suspect has been found guilty of the crime of murder.. You’re watching too many Clint Eastwood movies. You’re dillusional saying that a murder has been committed. If the accused was innocent by self defense during trial, is he still guilty of murder or any crime ? Of course not. The charges are dropped. You’re absolutly rediculous. You’re just grabbing straws. Time to move on.
LoL says the guy who tells me a crime hasn't been committed until "due process".
"We suspect the bank has been robbed, but since no one has been convicted yet, we can't be sure."
Nope, we’ll just let your juvenile, uninformed predudicial posts speak for themselves.
Are you sure that happened? I didn't get convicted yet.
It’s a crime just writing your illiterate posts.
Tell me more.
Separate names with a comma.