Chester, one thing I've learned about posting in these forums, is that nothing posted is worth getting upset over since I alone cannot change people's minds or actions. What I have learned is that you'll get all sorts of viewpoints that you may or may not agree with and you just have to live with them like it or not.
That makes no sense at all. It is a woman's position that counts within the law. You cannot (and will not) change that at all.
This thread isn't about your love affair with gamewell and how he feels..... Having trouble with the topic ????? (ridiculous as it is)
Then there are , according to you, millions and millions of women who are self-involved and degenerate.....which is a silly thing to claim since they aren't. "Simply" carry the fetus to term? "Simply" give up 9 months of one's life, suffer the pain of pregnancy and childbirth, suffer the physical damage, permanent and temporary, caused by pregnancy. "Simply" suffer financial/educational/career setbacks, suffer possible job loss, time off work...."simply" to throw a kid into the system where they may stay until they age out? Or to give someone else a kid... How "simple" life is for YOU.
. Women don't "give life". And, no, it isn't too late to have an abortion....a legal medical procedure that women have done for hundreds, if not thousands, of years. How quaint and ignorant to call pregnancy and what it entails as "rowing a boat".. Why? Women have no obligation to give other people babies. AGAIN (for the thousandths time) women do NOT need an excuse to have an abortion. . Gee, what an attitude: "to hell with any baby that isn't white and healthy" PROVE that statement (unlike all your other statements professing to KNOW what all women think) Your low opinion of women has always shown through.......must be lack of experience.
Well they have the option of snapping their legs shut if they don't want the inconvenience of 9 months of behaving decently. Yes, millions of women have convenience abortions. I'm speaking of them. How much of your attitude is not wanting to be a parent on your own or getting stuck with child support? You can wrap it in feminism if you want...
The old trite ignorant sexist crap about how women should just keep their legs together to please you .... Sad for you but they don't have to! They can have all the fun sex you're so jealous of and just have an abortion if they have an unwanted pregnancy BTW, the only reason FOR abortion is convenience....and so far no one has shown that convenience is against the law. If you want to do everything in your life as INconveniently as possible to make yourself feel good go ahead but most people are smarter than that.
I see her mostly as someone who seeks the benefit of a medical procedure from a government licensed provider of that service.
Somehow crying 'sexist' - to a woman - is a rebuttal? What your'e doing here is admitting that consequence-free sex is your motivation, which is what I just said. Because you don't care about the morality of the issue regarding callously killing an unborn child so you can have your next fling without waiting 9 months. No, the one driven by desire to feel good is you. I'm speaking of a basic level of moral decency. As I said, it's not "sexist" to point out that men back abortions because they don't want to get stuck with a kid and bitch they don't love, and they don't have to pay out child support.
I disagree. That may describe a nose job, but one's nose shape does not have nearly the same impact on everyone's life that a pregnancy does. Women are not basically stupid simplistic creatures, and they do not become them because they are pregnant. I suspect that most women put a lot of thought into what to do about that pregnancy. Its a pretty complicated matter with a lot of variables at work.
Or they can have the option of terminating the pregnancy if they so choose; isn't choice such a wonderful thing to enjoy? Just think of all those wonderful beautiful millions of children that get stuck in the custody of the state who'll need supervision, clothing, food, medical and other necessary means to survive.....all at taxpayer expense. Remember the key word here is "Millions". not as in money, but in children. When it comes to money think of "Billions". You still don't get it do you?? If people wanted to be parents, then they'd have the baby; I cannot make it any plainer to you then that. Stop trying to save the world and concentrate on your own life instead.
Giftedone is talking nonsense. The guy is responsible as is a woman for a pregnancy, accidental or not.
I don't see how any pregnancy can be described as accidental. It's not like there's ever been a case where two people, who just happened to be naked at the time, tripped and fell and landed in the awkward position of the man having his hotdog lodged inside the woman. At the most it's like that man who was holding up an encyclopedia, gave his girlfriend his gun and told her to shoot him because he believed the encyclopedia would stop the bullet.
Uh, it's not a hot dog, grownups say "penis"...... ...and yes, accidents do happen, all forms of birth control and contraceptive have failures.....
You are willing to adopt a handful of these unwanted children, yes? Dumping them into a home for unwanted children is not the answer. So you and others should Step up to the plate and “rescue” these unwanted children, rather than producing your own, because there is a plethora of them.
“What if” is one of the most commonly used phrases in the English language. “What if” the queen had testicles? What if. “What if” is a cop-out, and you can not go through life leaning on “What if”, because It a hypothetical, especially human life is in the balance.