Again,Why we did,in fact land on the moon

This is a very good analysis.

 

Here's another anomaly that closes the whole case by itself.
http://www.aulis.com/stereoparallax.htm

 

More debunked spam?.....everyone knows the absense of atmoshere on the moon makes perspective hard to judge....plus the supposed 'stereo views' of pictures are laughable


Fail scott/cosmored/fatfreddy88/david c.

 

Nor has your "proof" much effect on people who have an IQ over 70.

Why do you think that this is anomolous?

Excuse me, but there is gravity on the moon.

Like I said, there is gravity on the moon, but not on the ISS. Further, you don't need to be as bright as me to see that the two garments are cut much differently, and worn on bodies of two totally different sizes. They will not fall or float into the same position. No way. Try again. You are not talking to children who have never studied fashion design or simple 5th grade physics.

 

Some stupid SOB failed film school. That twit forgot that you need TWO single-perspective images to create a valid stereoscopic image. Tell that moron to return his GED and go take another couple of art courses, maybe some basic biology and a mechanical drawing class. Dumb lug nut can't even figure out something as simple as a shadow.

 

Why is he being so polite when addressing the maunderings of these children? Haven't any of the hoax-peddlers ever heard of a "shadow" or "reflected light?"

The stupid just burns.