The extent to which the brainwashed will defend obvious news fakers like Beck, Rush and Alex Jones amazes me. Well, Rush Limbaugh is so old and passe, Glenn Beck discredited himself rather quickly. I guess its over for all the "Conservative" media icons, and good riddance to them. They were all so phony, probably were FBI informants like radio host, Hal Turner. You can always tell who the govmnt agents are because they scream their extreme racist stuff to attract the conspiracy types or the militia gun groups, the Klan, so then the govmnt agent radio host can begin to spy on or antagonize or agitate that group. I know this one host on the air likes to scream at Right Wingers all the time, calls them filthy, crazy, religious scum and so on, he fits the perfect profile of an FBI agitator, like Alex Jones does. WATCH THIS VIDEO [video]http://www.video.me/ViewVideo.aspx?vid=12334[/video]
Alex Jones makes his money off of conspiracy theorists so I am surprise you don't tune in. The rest of your rant shows you don't have any idea what the other shows are about but buy into the liberal talking points.
I wish I had time to watch more of him. Most of what I've seen looked pretty objective such as this. http://www.google.es/#hl=es&gs_nf=1...v=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=26b7c9576385d2e6 He pretty much showed he was under some kind of control when he interviewed Apollo astronaut Buzz Aldrin though. http://www.google.es/#hl=es&sclient...pw.r_qf.&fp=26b7c9576385d2e6&biw=1280&bih=856 He assumed the moon missions were real when they were obviously faked. http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4001964&postcount=1 He didn't ask about any of the crushing proof of fakery; maybe he was afraid to or maybe he works for the big bosses. He sure did lie though.
I will admit to frequenting InfoWars, but I haven't really gotten into Jones. I just follow the links they imbed in their stories to the source. I can't get past what Jones looks like though. Yeah, I'm shallow. He just don't look like a guy that I could follow behind. His info may be good, but I don't need to see rotund, do I? He could hire the sexiest chick he could find at a college near him and his video sales would triple. He has the Michael Moore effect. I mean, could you imagine Michael Moore in Brad Pitt's body? Or someone similar. Lol
I'm a fan of Michael Moore. His "body" has never gotten in the way of appreciation for his well sourced facts. Maybe this is a clue your subconscious is giving you that Alex Jones is pushing snake oil; if his facts were correct I doubt you'd be bothered by his appearance. Jones is actually in better shape than Moore. This is no way makes Jones' conspiracy bullsh it more appealing to me.
While not nearly as shrill as Jones, I find Moore highly disingenuous as well. He'll occasionally make a very salient point (made a couple on Bowling for Columbine), but he'll ruin it by letting his hyperbole get the best of him. I prefer my Documentaries to be factual, not shrill.
I was highly active on Moorewatch during the Bowling for Columbine and F-911 years. Highly disingenuous is putting it nicely. Bowling is almost entirely a work of fiction. If the points were salient, they should have been made using accurate data. Instead his points are only salient in the theoretical reality he fabricates with movie magic.
I won't attempt to defend Moore and the way he makes his films (which are very bothersome to me), but I, personally, thought there was a vein of truth in the xenophobia reference he made in Bowling for Columbine. That particular point struck a certain chord with me, but, unfortuantely, probably got lost amongst the rest of the fluff he surrounded it with.
Moore's approach doesn't work for everyone, but most of his facts check out. He intentionally uses of hyperbole for effect; that's only disingenuous if he was pretending not to be using it, which he isn't. imo.
My understanding was that Moore hired people to fact check for his films. In many cases a probable true fact was left out because there wasn't a clear source. Nonetheless, I found Columbine to be very informative and thought provoking; for instance I had no idea Canadians owned as many guns as they did. Each to their own, I guess.
Clearly we don't. We'd rather talk about Michael Moore. Love him or hate him, he's far more interesting than Alex Jones.
A lot of what Jones says does have his personal sensationalized view, but, things are happening in the world, which are imbedded in the stories. I mean, how do you view the world today? Our country? Regarding the body image, it's just I have more respect for people that take care of themselves.
He's well ahead of curve on many things. "Official" proponents have great difficulty dealing with that so they collectively hate him. Go figure.
go to prisonplanet.. all his scrolling articals are completely made up... from his bloody brits in england.. all articals are made up.. and the pictures are all photoshopped.. hes also a vatican assasin sent from Jerusalem to serve the reptoids under the earths surface.. waiting to invade and crush conspiracy theorists necks.
Why is Alex Jones so relevant to you? Sure, all he does is make stuff up, but I think it's funny that people as kooky as Alex Jones are still threatening to the left - it just shows how insecure the left is, when even someone as nutty and irrelevant as Alex Jones is still threatening to them merely because his free speech is allowed to exist. Liberals just feel threatened by opposing views - period - the opposing view could be as nutty and unbelievable as it gets, and the left would still feel a need to "silence" it merely because it exists.
Right, he's basically a fiction writer - what's sad is that a lot of his hardcore fans consider themselves "free thinkers" but they blindly believe everything he says is "fact" without even investigating it themselves. And if no evidence exists to back up his claims, that's just because the "NWO" is censoring the truth I guess. I'm still debating whether Jones really believes his own stuff, or whether he just considers himself an entertainer.
My vote is con man, just like David Icke. Neither one of them can seriously believe what the peddle, but you can't argue with the cash flow.
