All The Doctors Testified They Saw An Exit Wound On The President

That is because you could quote no specific law of physics supporting your claim.

Also the complete and irrefutably proven lack of an entrance wound on the front of JFK's head wrecks your argument

 

It's the exact same issue with the destruction of the WTC towers. One would be required to argue against the laws of physics to support the official "collapse" theory.

 

You will be called a "conspiracy theorist" for siding with physics. Watch out!

 

Yeah that terrifies me. I'll stick with facts and science and leave the hypocritical name calling to trolls.

 

That is false and like yourbestfriend you cannot quote such a law of physics or explain how either report defies it

 

You have yet to state any facts

 

Dr Nazi, your anatomy knowledge is impeccable. The cervical spine has no connection to the skull base.

 

I never mentioned any of that.

If you are implying the neck wound could have exited the head then you are way out of touch. The wound in his neck was an exit wound.

ALl the wounds to Kennedy and Connally entered from above and behind which is the point. That does not come from me but from experts

 

s neck wound can't exit the skull ? My oh my, you are one fine doctor.

 

Examples and citation required

Otherwise leave

 

Zone I and zone II penetrating neck injuries can easily breech the skull base.
You need to remediate your medical clerkships young doctor

 

There was no wound at the base of the skull even the conspiracy loons do not claim that there was one.

You have no clue what you are talking about

 

Oswald as the sole shooter and all the shots coming from behind JFK is consistent with the autopsy findings.

 

it would have to penetrate the skull base before it could exit the posterior skull. That's a given.
You sure don't know anatomy, but that doesn't stop you from yapping odes it ?

 

I know you are still clueless.

That would require a bullet to travel at an upward angle meaning fired from the floor of the limo

 

Bullets are known to exit at remote sites with widely variable trajectories. High pressures from a high caliber rifle can cause significant damage to near and adjacent structures including fragile basilar and posterior skull bone

 

And what if the autopsy findings were a con job, run by two incompetent military doctors (Hume and Boswell), who were Bethesda Hospital
pencil pushers and who'd never conducted a forensic autopsy before in their lives and knew about as much about gun shot wounds in autopsies as you know about the deal languages of Babylon, for the benefit of all the attendant high ranking officers watching the procedure like hawks (which they no doubt were).

As the thread has established, many doctors at Parkland General Hospital all attested to the massive exit wound to the back of Kennedy's skull. No amount of cover ups or fake evidence can change that.

 

Just to digress slightly, if Oswald didn't kill Kennedy, who did, and why?
If some shady big business corporations hired a hitman to do it, what had Kennedy done to upset them?
Did they want to see Vice-Pres Johnson replace him for some unknown reason?

 

The mob (and some pissed off Cuba CIA types) did it. Carlos Marcello confessed in a taped jailhouse confession to an FBI informant. Bobby Kennedy was going after the mob and particularly Marcello (who he had somewhat illegally deported) . The intent was to "cut off the head" of the dog.

 

The autopsy findings were run by experienced and expert doctors who had performed many such autopsies.

Your claims about those doctors are outright lies.

The doctors at parkland were not such experts they were emergency room doctors who's casual observations do not challenge the autopsy

 

Oswald acted alone. And no evidence supports any other stupid theory.

 

In this case however the bullet entered from above and behind which is proven beyond any doubt.

Such possibilities of bullets acting as you describe mean nothing

 

By the discredited Warren Commission?

Oh

 

It has never been discredited.

Nor did they perform the autopsy.

The autopsy was performed quite some time before the Warren Commission was established.

You certainly have never even challenged it much less discredited it

 

Both have been challenged and discredited