All the vaccines contain the poison "Graphene"

I was thinking of Dr. Doug Rokke.

Talk - Dr. Doug Rokke - Depleted Uranium (DU)


In post #1 I compared the RAND study with what Dr. Doug Rokke said.
http://politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/are-conspiracy-theorists-ever-right.586948/

Of course Leuren Moret is no fool either.

 

Absurd spam. Even with the excessive use by US military in Iraq, the overwhelming issue is the lead content.

This crazy opinion based spam is used to generalize across the board corruption when it hasn't even been proven and has no generic relevance! Pathetic. He must have posted this crap a dozen times.

 

Pretty lame. I might as well ignore you and just post stuff I find for the viewers to check out and opine on.


This guy looks like he should be taken seriously.

Scientists Have Found Graphene, Metal, And Even A Colony Of Parasites In Vaccines
https://www.soulask.com/scientists-...l-and-even-a-colony-of-parasites-in-vaccines/

Scanning & Transmission Electron Microscopy Reveals Graphene Oxide in CoV-19 Vaccines
https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/...opy-reveals-graphene-oxide-in-cov-19-vaccines

 

pH Miracle' Author Robert O. Young Sentenced
As part of his previous guilty plea, Robert O. Young admitted in court he has no post high school degree from any accredited school

Young previously pleaded guilty to two charges of practicing medicine without a license.

He also stated he was none of the following: a microbiologist, a medical doctor, a hematologist, a naturopathic doctor or a trained scientist.

https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/ph-miracle-author-robert-o-young-sentenced/19346/

 

I just listened to this...

Dr. Robert O. Young ITNJ Testimony


...which I found here.
https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/...QXsyBl5XG0cokNJhFU4r_kSdionW8XaTck2Cc6g5VXG1o

I have to admit that some of the stuff he says sounds like a stretch. I have no medical background so I can't opine.

The people he is against have credentials but are a bunch of corrupt liars.
http://politicalforum.com/index.php...out-ivermectin.591850/page-12#post-1072976802

That has to be considered.


According to Wikipedia...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_O._Young

...he got his education here.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clayton_College_of_Natural_Health

The establishment wants to stamp out stuff that works if it's not profitable so I wouldn't be surprised if they were on to some groundbreaking stuff.
http://politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/cancer-the-forbidden-cures-full-documentary.592726/


I just started listening to this.

DR. JUDY MIKOVITS AND DR. ROBERT YOUNG: COVID, VACCINES AND VIRUSES
https://www.bitchute.com/video/28tP...SS34ZprNBYhVNQWmBNggNjNUoRbbu0wO4N_m_gJc5mqoE

 

Bolded bit is the only relevant statement. Italics is unproven paranoid batshit. Underlined is unproven bare-assertion batshit.

 

So why are you not listening to those of us who do?

 

The International Tribunal for Natural Justice is an organisation based in the United Kingdom that often shares conspiracy theories.

Robert David Steele, one of the members of this so-called "tribunal", claims that he is a former member of the CIA. In an interview from 2017, he claimed that American space agency NASA kidnapped his children and enslaved them on Mars.
Welcome to Bizarro world.

 

There's nothing bad about that.
http://politicalforum.com/index.php...-theorists-ever-right.586948/#post-1072565532

Could you link to that? If that's true, he sounds like one of those infiltrators such as a flat earther whose job is to discredit a movement. They join a movement and then take some kind of crazy stand to discredit the movement.


edit
--------------------------------------

This group seems to have done some research into this.

HOW TO REMOVE GRAPHENE OXIDE FROM THE BODY BY ORWELLITO, ORWELL CITY JULY 5, 2021
https://www.bitchute.com/video/O2Cx4cNW44CF/

 

Being in a gang of batshit believers is not bad at all. Just dumb.

The research skills of a 5 year old!

Batshit circular reasoning - he's just one of many you latch onto without having a clue. You never vet these people, because if it's batshit you believe it.

So what! And anyway, how would you know?

 

I have no medical background so I can't really opine too much when I find this stuff. I'm mainly posting it to get feedback.

Pandora's Box Opened: Graphene Oxide
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/pandora-039-s-box-opened-graphene-oxide_Xl7tiIoVHxJ7VDa.html


He makes sense to me but what do I know? Could someone who hasn't already destroyed his or her credibility* opine on this?


*
http://politicalforum.com/index.php...re-such-events.569790/page-12#post-1072977379

 

Took less than 2 minutes!

NASA: No, we don't have child slave colonies on Mars (sfgate.com)

 

See batshit post batshit.

No you aren't! You ignore feedback no matter what the source, even when it proves that your lying sources are deliberately deceptive. You still keep using them!

Absolutely nothing.

Just a little dumb for somebody like you, who has no relevant education, to be claiming some sort of ability to determine anyone's credibility!

This took 1 minute to find! You are the least scientific person I have ever come across - you are absolutely hopeless at research and never once attempt to verify your batshit before posting it!

There is no conclusive evidence that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine contains graphene oxide - Health Feedback
Unsupported: There is no evidence that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine contains graphene. The only sample used in the study is of unknown origin and traceability. Lists of the vaccine’s ingredients released by Pfizer-BioNTech do not include graphene oxide. The analysis, done using electron microscopy, is also inconclusive.
Misleading: These claims state that the analysis is an official study from the University of Almería. However, the university has “unequivocally” distanced itself from the analysis that claims to have found graphene oxide in a vial of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. The university also made it clear it doesn’t endorse the analysis.

 

There you go again naively posting mainstream info* as fact. I keep pointing out this bogus study by the RAND corporation done as a damage-control measure which totally discredits official sources.
http://politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/are-conspiracy-theorists-ever-right.586948/


*
http://politicalforum.com/index.php...at-the-lies-furiously.583345/#post-1072353798

 

Pathetic. There you go dismissing ANYTHING that contradicts your batshit. You are completely incapable of reasoned debate. The very people your idiotic lying video maker references, deny what he says. Then YOU have the insane audacity to dismiss them saying this?

PROVE THEIR CONCLUSIONS without putting up a stupid link or video! You cannot because you have no idea what you are doing!

Ludicrous spam - how the hell do moderators allow you to post this about 20 times?

http://politicalforum.com/index.php...-theorists-ever-right.586948/#post-1072568659

Whistleblowers, governments and lies. (debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com)

Tell the viewers why you, a public nuisance to the "elite", have not been "silenced" or "got at". You won't.

 

It totally debunks your argument when you post a government source as proof. You seem to be trying to bury it. The only way to counter that tactic is to post it every time you post an official source and consider it to be proof.

 

No it doesn't.

This is what you are doing.

1. You take a non-profit think tank report that assesses the dangers of using depleted uranium weapons.
2. You then fail to equate the use the report assesses and compare it to the excessive use in the gulf war.
3. You then determine an idiotic generalized conclusion through nothing more than your useless opinion and the opinion of a known conspiracy crank.
4. You fail miserably to understand that the vast bulk of collateral damage is caused by lead fragments!

What an idiotic comment.

You've already been found wanting in every single laborious, spammed subject you fumble at. So, no you go find it yourself - it was only done 3 months ago - does your spam confuse you THAT much?

We had this same "can't find it" bullshit with the bubble that you claimed I "blundered" on, when I answered it with the same info TEN YEARS AGO! We had the same issue on you claiming I didn't know how to speed videos up on youtube, when I showed you how to do it, that was only FOUR YEARS AGO! You are spamming this crap for about the fifth time on this forum and that is truly pathetic - now I suspect, rather than actually complete the ridiculously simple task of finding the thread I refer to, you will make some horseshit up about me evading your spam, or some idiotic "translation".

1. PoliticalForum.com - Forum for US and Intl Politics
2. Search - Depleted Uranium
3. Page 2 of 20 - my avatar.

Whistleblowers, governments and lies.


Actually what she says is that the scientists who worked at the company she worked at, sold out for money. To use somebody talking about corruption within the Nuclear power industry is completely irrelevant. This tarring of all scientists with the same brush is an act of subterfuge called poisoning the well. It ignores the fact that anybody who makes claims about a hoax is subject to these same parameters.

The startling fact about this "whistleblower", is that she makes a whole lot of money talking about this freely and openly, yet the evil powers haven't seen fit to silence her! Bunkum.



Again you cite an irrelevant case. The safety aspect of using depleted uranium is thought to be questionable. But long term studies suggest otherwise. Scaremongering is very much a popularity grabber these days!

The first case cited April 15, 1999, the second video in 2011. Do you have an updated release from the Rand corporation given the new studies available to them?

http://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P8066.html



Yes. Now all you have to do is to establish any single scientist tied to the space programs who has spoken out about this. There are thousands of retired ones, not needing research grants or money, yet nobody has voiced an alternate opinion to the correct official account. There are millions of physics students throughout the world who offer no objection to the calculus involved in Lunar gravity, space radiation or radio transmissions. There are large numbers of engineers in all countries who also do not dispute the efficacy of the Apollo hardware. Orbital mechanics which is a very complex subject supports all aspects of the Apollo program.

To suggest they are all keeping quiet implies that they are all aware of a hoax and simply doing so to maintain funding and to stay alive. Bunkum.



Meh.

An example where half assed research is presented as fact with no proper peer review. It is difficult to change anything when it is steeped in thousands of such peer-reviewed documents. Let alone by somebody who offers no counter to any of these documents, yet offers "Anti-Darwinian" theories based on suspect research and conclusions.



No, it means that if somebody presents crap unsubstantiated research to people who have previously performed superb research, it will be met with scorn.

Attributing this to finite science like geology has so many logical fallacies I don't know how to label it. How about just plain stupid. I did a full debunk on rock analysis by numerous institutions. The conclusions are nothing to do with keeping a hoax going, and it unintentionally adds a vast number of people to those who are "keeping the secret"! Geologists have no affinity to government or for that matter NASA. As stated previously, there are numerous now retired people who have examined the rocks.

No deathbed confessions, lawyer letters, whistleblowing tapes or leaked documents. Bunkum.



Watergate and Monicagate to name just two. The modern press is littered with conspiracy stories, often with total scorn, but not always. The idea that somebody coming forward to blow the whistle on Apollo would be ignored is a ludicrous statement. It would make a story that would go viral in seconds.



Link 1:-
Somebody does a cartoon about news restriction. Amazing proof.

Link 2:-
More Noam Chomsky and his freely expressed opinions. Still very much alive!

Link 3:-
More people alive and well, freely talking about restrictions in reporting on intelligence services and the CIA level of control. You'd think the evil people they were exposing would have bumped them off wouldn't you?!

Link 4:-
General search on one of the people in link 3 - William Schaap. He is still freely talking, giving his opinion and not being bumped off.

Link 5:-
More Chomsky. Zzzzzz. Same thing, freely expressing his opinion, and still alive. I'm seeing a pattern here.

Link 6:-
Chomsky, yada yada yada.

Link 7/8/9:-
More "media is controlled by the evil powers", and a headline quote from 1880.

Link 10:-
Laura Knight-Jadczyk article. I shall simply state that this lady also postulates that Comet Elenin is the harbinger of doom.

Link 11:-
This is my favorite! The evil Fox news network exposed. This being the same evil Fox news network that ran a documentary of profound stupidity about a supposed Apollo Moon hoax!!

You just cannot make up this level of contradictory stupidity.

Link 12:-
Same as links 7/8/9. Media whistleblowers, loads of articles from people telling their story, who fascinatingly are all still alive.

Astonishingly moronic and spam. Using a legitimate news source is "a tactic" because your idiotic preformed conclusion using debunked batshit says so!

 

You can pretend all you want but you looked silly when you tried to obfuscate the Apollo hoax proof*. You got totally owned in these two threads.
http://politicalforum.com/index.php...es-apollo-moon-landings-ever-happened.512081/
http://politicalforum.com/index.php...-apollo-15-flag.438617/page-4#post-1065732533

You seem to be trying to waste as much of my time as possible to keep me from doing research on covid.


*
http://politicalforum.com/index.php...ers-are-corrupt.441261/page-2#post-1072215068

 

The sheer irony in that statement. Over and over you are getting your backside kicked and each time you either ignore the evidence, claim it is debunker food or grudgingly admit it with your spammed by numbers cut and paste reply.

I just made a large post detailing why your idiotic claims are nonsense and you chose to divert into more spam about something completely unrelated. Pathetic. You completely avoided every single salient point in that post. That sums you up completely.

It isn't covid, it is covid-19 and you have not the slightest clue as to how to conduct any research. I have never come across anybody so wilfully ignorant of even basic research skills. You exhibit no logic, no reasoning skills and dismiss every single argument made by either ignoring it, labelling it mainstream (debunked above whether you are honest enough to admit it or not!) or handwave it away.

You are once again deliberately avoiding evidence that contradicts your batshit video "because it's mainstream" and because of your stupid spammed to death links.

FALSE: University of Almeria’s study shows that vaccines contain graphene oxide. – Poynter

Links to >>>>> There is no conclusive evidence that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine contains graphene oxide - Health Feedback
"English Translation:
You have asked us through our WhatsApp verification service (+34 627 28 08 15) if it is true that the University of Almería [a public university in Almería, Spain] has published a study that shows the presence of graphene in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. This is false.

Although a document concerning vaccines and graphene oxide on which the university’s seal appears has gone viral, this document isn’t endorsed by the University of Almería. In fact, the academic institution has “unequivocally” distanced itself from this alleged study and its conclusions.

The viral document is neither a scientifically supported study nor does it provide conclusive evidence that the authorized COVID-19 vaccines contain either graphene or graphene oxide, as claimed in different viral messages that have been disseminated with a link to the document.

The author of the report compared images obtained via electron microscopy. One of them is from a sample of graphene oxide, and the other of a liquid that, according to the document, could be the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, although the product’s “origin and traceability is unknown”.

Based on the scientific evidence available, experts who spoke to Newtral.es refuted that the authorized COVID-19 vaccines are made with graphene, an ingredient that doesn’t appear on the vaccine’s package inserts, which are rigorously reviewed by health authorities.

The origin of the analyzed sample of the presumed vaccine: unknown
The document you have asked us about, titled “Detection of graphene oxide in aqueous suspensions (Cominarty)” was published 28 June 2021 and shared on various anti-vaccine websites.

Comirnaty is the commercial name of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, but as we have already shown, there is no evidence that the liquid analyzed in the document is from this vaccine.

The document’s author acknowledges that a vial arrived by “courier” service, but that he doesn’t know its traceability. In addition, he also clarifies that the person who sent him this supposed vial is Ricardo Delgado Martín, who has disseminated anti-vaccine content.

The document doesn’t show that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine contains graphene
The document we are analyzing isn’t published in a prestigious scientific journal in its field, which provides a “quality seal” to scientific work. There is also no evidence that the text has been validated by the scientific community through the process known as peer review, in which the methodology, interpretation, results, and conclusions are checked.

As is made clear in the document, it’s an “interim report” whose objective is the “microscopic identification of graphene derivatives” in an alleged sample of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. To do this, images of the sample, obtained through electron microscopy, are compared with images of “reduced graphene oxide” taken from the scientific literature.

As stated in the publication, the images present “a high similarity” to each other, therefore, from this comparison, it is concluded that “the microscopic study of the sample provides evidence of the probable presence of graphene derivatives.”

However, the author proceeds to acknowledge that “microcopy doesn’t provide conclusive evidence” and that the “analyses in this report are from a single, limited sample.”

“It is therefore necessary to carry out a significant sampling of similar vials to draw conclusions that can be generalized to comparable samples, recording origin, traceability and quality control during conservation and transport prior to analysis,” the document highlights.

Ultimately, the publication doesn’t provide conclusive evidence that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine contains graphene oxide. Nor that it contains graphene, as claimed in anti-vaccine messages. Here you can access the package insert for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, which lists the components of this vaccine (on page 11 ) [Health Feedback: The full list of ingredients can be seen on page 29].

Newtral.es has already explained that there is no evidence that the other authorized COVID-19 vaccines contain graphene, as the president of the Spanish Vaccination Association, Amós García, explained to us.

The University of Almería has distanced itself from the alleged analysis
The individual who signs the report that we are verifying is Pablo Campra, a researcher and professor at the University of Almería.

Campra himself highlights in the document that the results “do not imply any position of the University of Almería” and that neither he nor the university “assume any responsibility for the content and opinion of third parties.”

However, because the university’s logo appears on the document, COVID-19 denialist groups are sharing the alleged analysis of the vaccine as an official study from an academic institution.

The University of Almería has already “unequivocally” distanced itself from the researcher’s conclusions in the document and, in fact, clarifies that it is not a scientific study endorsed by the university, while reminding that the substance being analyzed is of “unknown” origin. "

YOU SPEAK SPANISH! Read it from the source, track it down like an honest researcher instead of:

See batshit, post batshit!

 

There's some strange new stuff here. Dr. Carrie Madej has credibility so I wouldn't just rule this out.

Dr. Carrie Madej Reveals Tentacled Self-Aware Organism (Also Self-Assembling Nanobots & Nanolipids) in Moderna, Johnson & Johnson Vaccine Vials, Possibly Connected to Hydra Vulgaris “Model Organism” and Human Genome Project
https://everydayconcerned.net/2021/...compound microscope (posted below) illustrate.

Toxins Found in COVID Vaccines, Masks, Swabs
https://everydayconcerned.net/toxins-in-covid-vaccines-masks-swabs/

 

I thought id stick my head in just for fun

(The last post)

 

You almost have to admire the 'throw every batshit idea under creation up against the wall and then demand people take you seriously' approach. People who have spent decades & decades studying & fighting diseases are dismissed with a wave of the hand, but any random person can literally claim anything bizarre and we are supposed to treat it as credible.

What ever happened to '5G causes COVID'? I miss that.

 

She is a crazy antivax lunatic - an osteopath - a "child of god". Explain exactly why she has credibility - ya know, using the scientific method! Then explain how she has used it - merely quoting her is not sufficient - show how she has proven any single aspect of this completely fabricated batshit!

 

Thank you immensely for these links....
I will have to get into these as soon as I have some free time.

 

Thank you for the piece from Dr. Rokke. I was objecting to the use of DU when it was happening. As Dr. Rokke points out, we poisoned our own troops. It was criminal behavior.