For the most part. There were a handful of racists who attached themselves to libertarianism for a while (mostly under the Ron Paul banner) because they were only focused on those rights that would allow them to discriminate. But libertarianism as a whole seems more in line with classical liberalism than either of the more prominent sides of American politics are. Whether that is a good thing or a bad thing is up for debate, but there isn't really much debate that it is, indeed, a thing.
Hey Art - I'm still waiting for your "poof" - oops, I mean "proof" that I called all white people 'evil'.
Hey Art - I'm still waiting for your "poof" - oops, I mean "proof" that I called all white people 'evil'.
Hey Art - still waiting for your "proof" that I said all whites are evil. How much longer are you going to keep me waiting for your great proof???
Hey Artie - still waiting for "proof" of your claim that I said all whites were evil. Come, come now - the world awaits ....
There really about 4 groups in the USA: 1.Conservative Liberals 2,Progressive Liberals 3.Centrist Liberals 4 Communist Anarchists The 1st 3 groups, generally fall in line with John Locke Liberalism, generally agree that the form of government is somewhere between pure Democracy and pure Republic. and agree with most of the principles in the US Constitution. They have disagreements about some social issues and disagreement on economic structure of the country, but do not really wish fundamental transformation of the USA into some other form of government or lack thereof. The 4th group wants to totally and fundamentally change the form of government of the USA into a collective totalitarian government, preferably a Communist party dominated government. The 4th group trys to get the other 3 groups of Liberal Americans engaged in argument with each other, and attempts to recruit from these 3 groups any element that feels "aggrieved", or "oppressed" and promises them a better way, if only they join the "revolution".
give examples of each - also provide links from these organizations whose constitutions or "who we are" statements conform to your view also, please demonstrate how an anarchists who oppose government can possibly be communists who favor bigger government
thats funny. the militia/patriot movement is mainly made up of folks who are trying to continue on in the footsteps of JFKs Civil Defense initiative, insecure in the governments ability to take care of us in a disaster. And they're led by honorably discharged service members, usually career vets. They're not a danger to anyone who isnt a threat to the country. You've been watching too much TV.
With the abuses of power, lies, private email servers, false dossier justificaitons for warrants, classified documents blowing in the wind, and mutliple laws broken by Hillary, Obama, Lynch, Holder, Brennan, Comey.... Don't we Americans have a few more important things to worry, right here at home, about than Catalan Secession? -
Mores like the Term { invention of Liberals and Hillary } Alt-Right has been exposed and put to rest for what it was. Another invention of Liberals and Leftistrs alike to knock out of the park the reality of true Americanism or Conservatism. Donald Trump proved what the American Populace and Electorate were pleading for.That being to Make America Great Again. The overflow crowds Trump generates wherever he goes is proof that his former chief adviser Steven Bannon was and is Now, more than ever ... spot-on. Calling it some name like Alt-right does little if anything to extinguish it's legitimacy or place in American political history.
the anti war movements such as Vietnam and Iraq were the ones led by vets like that but they were called unpatriotic by delusional far right critics in the media
By 'far right' I presume you mean 'establishment.' Warmongering and Imperialism are not sentiments common in the modern militia movement. More common are the desires to 'bring our troops home' and spend less money on foreign wars so we can lower taxes. And, of course, End the Fed (and by extension, the power of the MIC, a term not unknown by the Nam and Iraq protester types, Im sure you would agree ) Again, you seem to be basing your opinion of the militia movement on TV instead of reality.
Contrary to your mythical beliefs, I know the militia movement quite well, have challenged them many times on their inconsistent views of government, and even dared them to voice their objections to government intrusiveness when police harass minorities. In fact, I have done that to radicals of the far right on this forum. Recall the incident in Ferguson where cops killed an innocent black youth. As shown on various videos, cops employed agent provocateurs to create violence. This made up violence is used to "justify" more police crimes upon innocents. I challenged Oath Keepers to disarm the cops, to arrest them, and to put them on citizens tribunals. Instead of doing so, the hypocritical OK's defended the cops and actually stood side by side with them. This after having previously pledged to defend the people's rights. This hypocrisy proves they are nothing but a bunch of full of sh‖t phonies. Completely full of sh‖t.
How is Alt Right dead? It's a term invented by the liberal media and their antifa/anarchists/Soros followers etc. friend. It's totally ridiculuous. The Alt Right as such has never existed. A term liberal media coined and overused to scare off their supporters.
Richard Spencer brought it into popular use, Brietbart called itself the home of the alt right. Both supported by Soros, no doubt.
You challenged the Oathkeepers to an insurrection against the local government of Ferguson, and they're 'full of **** phonies' for not doing so... k